<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>ACD Archives - Coin Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/acd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/acd/</link>
	<description>Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2024 15:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Ethereum Developers Consider Splitting the Pectra Upgrade into Two Phases</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/ethereum-developers-consider-splitting-the-pectra-upgrade-into-two-phases/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/ethereum-developers-consider-splitting-the-pectra-upgrade-into-two-phases/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2024 15:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethereum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prague]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=29293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ethereum developers are contemplating dividing the upcoming Pectra upgrade into two distinct phases, aiming to enhance the network&#8217;s efficiency and scalability. The first phase is tentatively scheduled for early 2025. Developers Eyeing an Accelerated Rollout During a meeting on September 12 regarding Ethereum&#8217;s execution layer, a developer mentioned that if the upgrade is split, the</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/ethereum-developers-consider-splitting-the-pectra-upgrade-into-two-phases/">Ethereum Developers Consider Splitting the Pectra Upgrade into Two Phases</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethereum developers are contemplating dividing the upcoming Pectra upgrade into two distinct phases, aiming to enhance the network&#8217;s efficiency and scalability. The first phase is tentatively scheduled for early 2025.</p>
<p><strong>Developers Eyeing an Accelerated Rollout</strong></p>
<p>During a meeting on September 12 regarding Ethereum&#8217;s execution layer, a developer mentioned that if the upgrade is split, the goal would be to release the first part as soon as possible, ideally at the beginning of the next year.</p>
<p>“If we do decide to split, our aim is to roll out the first phase of Pectra as swiftly as possible, ideally by early next year,” stated an <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/crypto-market-sees-surge-in-whale-activity-led-by-toncoin-ethereum-and-fet/">Ethereum</a> developer.</p>
<p>Another developer suggested that a February release might be realistic for the split version.</p>
<p>Developer Danno Ferrin added, “It makes sense to consider splitting the fork only if the delivery is planned for the first quarter.”</p>
<p><strong>Splitting the Upgrade May Reduce Risks</strong></p>
<p>It has been proposed that dividing the upgrade could be a safer approach since smaller forks generally carry less risk.</p>
<p>The Pectra upgrade combines two separate improvements: Prague and Electra. The Prague upgrade focuses on changes to the network’s execution layer, while Electra affects the consensus layer.</p>
<p>Christine Kim, a crypto researcher at Galaxy, believes that “Given the complexity of the current Pectra fork and the desire to add more to the upgrade, the likelihood of splitting is high.”</p>
<p>“If developers opt to divide the upgrade into two hard forks, the scope of the Pectra upgrade could change dramatically,” Kim added.</p>
<p><strong>Optimistic Industry Outlook on Pectra</strong></p>
<p>A final decision on this matter is expected during the next Ethereum All Core Developers (ACD) call on September 19.</p>
<p>Kim had previously noted on June 7 that the Pectra upgrade was shaping up to be the largest in Ethereum&#8217;s history.</p>
<p>Ethereum educator Sassal echoed a similar sentiment, stating to his 254,500 followers, “Pectra is set to be Ethereum’s next major network upgrade, potentially the largest in Ethereum’s history.”</p>
<p>In April 2024, Cointelegraph reported that Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 3074 was approved for inclusion in the next update. This proposal enables regular crypto wallets to function like smart contracts.</p>
<p>One of the functionalities of EIP-3074 is to provide smart contract capabilities to standard external accounts (EOAs) — ordinary wallets like MetaMask. This facilitates features such as transaction batching, which requires only a single signature, and sponsored transactions where one wallet can allocate funds to be used by another.</p>
<p>The potential splitting of the Pectra upgrade presents both opportunities and challenges for the Ethereum community. While a faster and less risky update could advance the network in the short term, the expansion of scope and increased complexity might impact long-term goals. The decisions made by developers will be crucial in determining Ethereum&#8217;s future scalability and functionality.</p>
<p><em>Also, in the comment section, you can freely share your comments and opinions about the topic. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on <a href="https://t.me/coinengineernews" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow"><strong>Telegram</strong></a>, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow"><strong>YouTube</strong></a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>Twitter</strong></a> for the latest <a title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7">news</a> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/ethereum-developers-consider-splitting-the-pectra-upgrade-into-two-phases/">Ethereum Developers Consider Splitting the Pectra Upgrade into Two Phases</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/ethereum-developers-consider-splitting-the-pectra-upgrade-into-two-phases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ethereum.webp' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ethereum.webp' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
