<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>camol Archives - Coin Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/camol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/camol/</link>
	<description>Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:03:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Claims That Pump.fun’s $500M Funds Are Locked Proven False</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/claims-that-pump-funs-500m-funds-are-locked-proven-false/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/claims-that-pump-funs-500m-funds-are-locked-proven-false/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emre Yumlu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 16:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[locked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pump token]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pump.fun]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=46187</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Recent rumors circulating across social media have claimed that the $500 million raised in Pump.fun’s presale is permanently locked due to a missing withdrawal function. However, technical analysis has since debunked these claims. Where Did the Pump.fun Rumor Come From? Over the weekend, a user on platform X, going by the handle “camol,” alleged that</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/claims-that-pump-funs-500m-funds-are-locked-proven-false/">Claims That Pump.fun’s $500M Funds Are Locked Proven False</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-start="218" data-end="460">Recent rumors circulating across social media have claimed that the <strong data-start="286" data-end="302">$500 million</strong> raised in <strong data-start="313" data-end="327"><a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/pumpfun-pump-token-presale-sold-out-within-minutes/">Pump</a>.fun’s</strong> presale is permanently locked due to a missing withdrawal function. However, technical analysis has since <strong data-start="434" data-end="446">debunked</strong> these claims.</p>
<h3 data-start="462" data-end="496">Where Did the Pump.fun Rumor Come From?</h3>
<p data-start="498" data-end="771">Over the weekend, a user on platform X, going by the handle “camol,” alleged that the <strong data-start="584" data-end="599">$PUMP token</strong> smart contract lacks a withdrawal function. According to the post, this supposedly meant that the raised funds were inaccessible forever because the contract is immutable.</p>
<p data-start="773" data-end="1030">“This effectively means the $500 million is locked forever,” the user stated, drawing over 780,000 views. In follow-up posts, they insisted on the claim, citing obscure technical jargon like “JSON SQL SUGARTOWN ORA CORES SECURITY” to support their argument.</p>
<h3 data-start="1032" data-end="1077">Hacken Responds: The Funds Are Not Locked</h3>
<p data-start="1079" data-end="1421">Crypto security firm <strong data-start="1100" data-end="1110">Hacken</strong> provided a detailed technical response to clarify the situation. According to their analysis, there are actually two separate <strong data-start="1237" data-end="1245">Pump.fun</strong> token <strong>PUMP</strong> deployed on the <strong data-start="1269" data-end="1290">Solana blockchain</strong>—one of which is a test or fake token with negligible activity, and another which is the official token linked to the real presale.</p>
<p data-start="1423" data-end="1826">Hacken confirmed that the <strong data-start="1449" data-end="1467">official token</strong> has over 10,000 holders and matches the public tokenomics disclosed by Pump.fun. While it’s true that the smart contract does <strong data-start="1594" data-end="1601">not</strong> include a “withdraw” function, this is <strong data-start="1641" data-end="1662">completely normal</strong> for both <strong data-start="1672" data-end="1686">Solana SPL</strong> and <strong data-start="1691" data-end="1710">Ethereum ERC-20</strong> token standards. These contracts are not built to hold funds like vaults—they simply manage balances and transfers.</p>
<p data-start="1828" data-end="2210">“Since there was no DEX listing at launch, the lack of a ‘withdraw’ function is irrelevant,” Hacken stated, dismissing the fears as technically inaccurate. They further verified that the on-chain token distribution aligns with public data—15% of tokens sold during the ICO, and the remaining 85% held in developer-linked wallets, reflecting a transparent allocation process.</p>
<h3 data-start="2212" data-end="2251">The ICO Sold Out in Just 12 Minutes</h3>
<p data-start="2253" data-end="2416">Pump.fun’s initial coin offering (ICO), held last Saturday, was an overwhelming success—selling out in just <strong data-start="2361" data-end="2375">12 minutes</strong> and raising a total of <strong data-start="2399" data-end="2415">$500 million</strong>.</p>
<p data-start="2418" data-end="2455">According to the official tokenomics:</p>
<ul data-start="2457" data-end="2627">
<li data-start="2457" data-end="2514">
<p data-start="2459" data-end="2514">33% of the total supply was allocated for the ICO</p>
</li>
<li data-start="2515" data-end="2579">
<p data-start="2517" data-end="2579">24% is reserved for the ecosystem and future development</p>
</li>
<li data-start="2580" data-end="2627">
<p data-start="2582" data-end="2627">13% was allocated to existing investors</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p data-start="2629" data-end="2739">Of the ICO allocation, 18% was sold to institutional investors, while 15% went to retail participants.</p>
<hr />
<p data-start="2629" data-end="2739"><em>You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <a href="https://t.me/coinengineernews" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>Telegram, </strong></a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>YouTube</strong></a>, and <a href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers"><strong>Twitter</strong></a> channels for the latest news and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/claims-that-pump-funs-500m-funds-are-locked-proven-false/">Claims That Pump.fun’s $500M Funds Are Locked Proven False</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/claims-that-pump-funs-500m-funds-are-locked-proven-false/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/pump.fun_.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/pump.fun_.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
