Democratic Senator Angela Alsobrooks, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, recently indicated that progress on the legislation may require concessions from both the cryptocurrency industry and the traditional banking sector. According to the senator, meaningful regulation will likely involve balancing the interests of two powerful financial groups with different priorities.

Speaking at an event hosted by the American Bankers Association, Alsobrooks revealed that she is working alongside Republican Senator Thom Tillis to develop a compromise proposal aimed at advancing the legislation. However, she acknowledged that the final outcome may not fully satisfy either side.

Compromise May Be Necessary

Alsobrooks emphasized that legislative progress often requires abandoning the pursuit of a “perfect solution.” In her view, both the crypto sector and banking institutions may need to accept certain trade-offs in order to create a workable regulatory framework.

The senator also warned against leaving the digital asset market without proper oversight. A completely unregulated system, she argued, could introduce significant risks to financial stability. One particular concern involves the possibility that funds could rapidly move from traditional bank deposits into crypto products if adequate safeguards are not in place.

Stablecoin Yields at the Center of Debate

One of the most contentious topics slowing progress on the bill is the issue of stablecoin yield programs. Some crypto platforms offer interest-like returns on stablecoin holdings as a way to attract and retain users.

Banking groups, however, argue that such programs could incentivize customers to move funds away from traditional bank accounts and into crypto platforms. In their view, this dynamic could pose a risk to the broader banking system if it leads to significant deposit outflows.

As a result, several banking organizations have urged lawmakers to include a provision in the Senate’s crypto market structure legislation that would prohibit third-party yield payments tied to stablecoins.

Concerns About Regulatory Gaps

The debate partly stems from perceived gaps in earlier legislative efforts. While the GENIUS Act restricts stablecoin issuers from offering yield directly on their tokens, critics argue that the rule may leave room for external platforms to provide similar returns through alternative mechanisms.

Banking industry representatives believe a broader ban on stablecoin yields would eliminate this potential loophole and prevent the emergence of quasi-banking products operating outside traditional regulatory protections.

The cryptocurrency industry, on the other hand, has pushed back against such restrictions. Many crypto firms argue that yield programs are a key component of their services and play an important role in maintaining competitiveness and user engagement.

This disagreement has become one of the main obstacles delaying the advancement of the broader crypto market structure legislation.

Bank-Like Products Should Meet Bank-Level Standards

Alsobrooks also stressed that digital financial products resembling traditional banking services should be subject to comparable regulatory safeguards. According to her perspective, consumer protection must remain a priority when financial products function similarly to savings accounts or other bank-related offerings.

In essence, the senator argues that if a financial service behaves like a banking product, it should adhere to similar oversight and risk management standards.

Public Opinion Adds Pressure

A recent survey conducted by Morning Consult, involving 4,456 adults across the United States, suggests that public opinion may support tighter oversight in certain circumstances.

The survey found that:

• 42% of respondents support banning stablecoin yields if they pose a risk to bank deposit levels.

• 84% believe companies offering bank-like financial services should follow the same consumer protection standards as traditional banks.

These findings indicate that the debate surrounding stablecoin yields and crypto regulation is not limited to policymakers and industry groups, but is also gaining attention among the broader public.

A Critical Phase for U.S. Crypto Regulation

The United States is still in the process of defining a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets. As discussions continue, lawmakers face the challenge of balancing innovation within the crypto industry while maintaining the stability of the traditional financial system.

The ongoing negotiations between banking representatives, crypto companies, and policymakers will likely play a decisive role in shaping the final version of the legislation. Whether a compromise can be reached — and when the bill might ultimately be approved — remains one of the most closely watched developments in the future of crypto regulation in the U.S. financial landscape.

Also, in the comment section, you can freely share your comments and opinions about the topic. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on Telegram, YouTube and Twitter for the latest news and updates.

The post Senator Talked Crypto Market Structure Bill: When Approval Come? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

What Is the CLARITY Act Designed to Do?

Commonly referred to as the CLARITY Act, the proposed bill seeks to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets in the United States. The legislation has already advanced in the House of Representatives, while discussions and negotiations continue in the Senate.

Two primary sticking points remain unresolved. The first concerns whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer yield or rewards to holders. Crypto-native firms argue that yield-bearing stablecoins are essential for competitiveness and innovation. Traditional banks, however, contend that allowing interest-like returns on stablecoin balances could draw deposits away from the banking system and introduce financial stability risks.

The second area of contention involves conflict-of-interest provisions. Some lawmakers are pushing for restrictions that would limit the ability of senior government officials — including the President — and their families to participate in certain crypto-related financial activities. Reports suggest that discussions between industry representatives, banking groups, and policymakers are ongoing, with the possibility of compromise still on the table.

Eight Potential Tailwinds if Passed

JPMorgan analysts outline eight potential benefits should the bill become law.

First, it would clearly distinguish between “digital commodities” regulated by the CFTC and “digital securities” overseen by the SEC, reducing compliance uncertainty. A grandfather provision could allow certain ETF-linked assets such as XRP, Solana, Litecoin, Hedera, Dogecoin, and Chainlink to fall under the more flexible CFTC framework.

Second, early-stage projects would be granted a transition period allowing up to $75 million in annual fundraising without full SEC registration while progressing toward decentralization. Third, tokens initially sold as securities could later transition to commodity status once sufficiently decentralized.

Fourth and fifth, clearer rules for intermediaries and custody could enable institutions like BNY Mellon and State Street to directly safeguard digital assets, while also supporting tokenization of traditional securities. Sixth, miners, validators, and software developers would receive exemptions from broker-style reporting during development under certain conditions.

Seventh, small crypto payments could qualify for tax exemptions, and staking taxation would gain clarity. Eighth, by defining stablecoins more as digital cash than investment products, the bill could shift institutional interest toward tokenized deposits.

If enacted by mid-year as anticipated, the CLARITY Act could significantly reshape the regulatory landscape and improve market structure clarity heading into the second half of the year.

Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, please follow us on our Telegram, YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post When Will the Clarity Act Be Approved? JPMorgan Gives a Date! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty, who attended the session, emphasized that bipartisan backing for sensible crypto market structure legislation remains intact. However, the debate over whether stablecoin holders should be allowed to earn yield has emerged as the central sticking point in negotiations.

Stablecoin Yield at the Center of Disagreement

The House of Representatives previously approved a similar market structure proposal, the CLARITY Act, in July. Yet the legislative process stalled in the Senate Banking Committee due to insufficient bipartisan support. Momentum weakened further after Coinbase withdrew its backing for the bill, citing provisions that would prohibit yield payments tied to stablecoins.

Banking groups argue that allowing stablecoin holders to receive yield—especially through third-party platforms such as crypto exchanges—could draw funds away from traditional bank deposits. In their view, such mechanisms may erode deposit bases and pose risks to financial system stability. Reports indicate that documents circulated by banking representatives during the meeting outlined principles supporting a broad prohibition on stablecoin interest or yield structures.

Discussions Ongoing, No Final Deal

The latest White House session was reportedly more focused and technical compared to the earlier meeting held in recent weeks. Participants from the crypto sector described the exchange as serious and solution-oriented, though fundamental differences remain unresolved.

Major banking organizations—including the American Bankers Association, the Bank Policy Institute, and the Independent Community Bankers of America—issued a joint statement stressing that continued dialogue is necessary to move the legislation forward. They highlighted the importance of fostering financial innovation without compromising the safety and soundness of the banking system or jeopardizing deposits that support local lending and economic activity.

Meanwhile, some crypto industry voices argue that reopening debates over stablecoin yield—already addressed in the GENIUS Act, which bars issuers from directly paying interest—risks delaying broader market structure reforms. According to this view, the overarching regulatory framework should advance independently of the yield dispute.

For now, negotiations remain active but inconclusive, with the fate of the proposed legislation hinging on whether common ground can be found in the coming weeks.

In the comment section, you can freely share your comments about the topic. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter for the latest news and updates.

The post Key Crypto Bill Talks Conclude in Washington: What Happened? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Lummis is one of Congress’s most prominent advocates for Bitcoin and blockchain technology. Her long-standing push for clear, functional legal frameworks has made her a trusted voice within the crypto ecosystem. As a result, her remarks have drawn considerable attention from market participants and policymakers alike.

What Does the CLARITY Act Aim to Do?

The CLARITY Act is designed to establish a coherent regulatory structure for digital assets in the United States. At its core, the bill seeks to eliminate jurisdictional overlap and clearly define which regulators oversee different categories of crypto assets.

Under the proposed framework:

• The SEC would supervise digital assets classified as securities

• The CFTC would oversee commodities-based crypto assets such as Bitcoin

By clarifying these roles, the legislation aims to provide companies with predictable compliance standards while offering investors greater legal certainty. The bill passed the House of Representatives in July 2025 with a 294–134 vote, reflecting notable bipartisan support.

Why Regulatory Clarity Matters Now

Uncertainty has proven costly for the U.S. crypto sector. In recent years, unclear rules and enforcement-driven regulation have pushed startups, capital, and talent offshore. While Europe advanced with MiCA and parts of Asia became innovation hubs, many U.S.-based firms faced lawsuits rather than guidance.

The CLARITY Act is intended to reverse this trend. With clearer rules in place:

• Crypto startups can operate with greater confidence

• Institutional investors can deploy capital more decisively

• Legal and compliance risks are significantly reduced

In short, clarity creates conditions for sustainable growth rather than defensive positioning.

Presidential Backing Changes the Equation

Executive support is often the missing piece in major regulatory reforms. A president willing to sign the CLARITY Act sends a strong signal to both regulators and markets that digital assets are no longer viewed solely as a risk, but as a legitimate part of the financial system.

For Bitcoin, clearer CFTC oversight could accelerate institutional adoption across ETFs, custody services, and payment infrastructure. For Ethereum and other networks, a framework based on decentralization metrics could replace ad-hoc interpretations with consistent standards.

A Turning Point for U.S. Crypto Markets?

Senator Lummis’s call for swift Senate action underscores the urgency of the moment. With political momentum building and public sentiment shifting toward innovation and competitiveness, the CLARITY Act appears closer to becoming law than ever before.

If enacted, the legislation could mark the beginning of a new chapter—one in which the United States reclaims a leadership role in the global crypto economy through transparency, certainty, and regulatory balance.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post President Delivers Critical Message on Clarity Act! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Democrats Push to Reopen Talks for Crypto

According to individuals familiar with the discussions, a group of Senate Democrats remains committed to advancing crypto legislation through the Agriculture Committee. These lawmakers are reportedly willing to reengage with the team of Committee Chair Senator John Boozman, a Republican, in an effort to craft a version of the bill that could attract support from both parties.

Rather than allowing the proposal to stall indefinitely, Democrats are signaling openness to compromise—provided the final text reflects balance, transparency, and shared authorship. As Thursday’s vote approaches, behind-the-scenes outreach is expected to continue.

Regulatory Authority at the Center of the Dispute

The bill aims to define a federal regulatory structure for digital assets, but disagreements have intensified over the past month. A key sticking point is the division of oversight between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), along with new disclosure and transparency requirements for market participants.

For the legislation to advance to the full Senate, both the Agriculture Committee and the Senate Banking Committee must approve their respective versions. That dual-track requirement has complicated progress.

Banking Committee Stalls the Process for Crypto

Both committees had originally planned to vote on January 15, but neither did so. While the Agriculture Committee delayed its session, the Banking Committee effectively paused its work after withdrawing support amid concerns linked to Coinbase’s activities, including tokenized equities and stablecoin-related incentives. No new voting date has been announced by the Banking Committee.

November Consensus Falls Apart

Committee spokesperson Sara Lasure has stated that the version set for a vote reflects months of bipartisan collaboration. Democrats, however, argue that a draft jointly developed in November was later altered without their input in early January. That move, they say, undermined trust and derailed cooperative momentum.

A draft released last week by the Republican-led committee failed to gain Democratic backing. Although some adjustments were discussed—partly aimed at addressing concerns related to former President Trump and his family’s crypto holdings—key Democratic negotiators declined to submit amendments.

White House Urges Swift Action

TD Cowen analyst Jaret Seiberg notes that Democratic support currently appears unlikely, though negotiations could still unfold during the voting process itself. The White House continues to advocate for rapid passage, emphasizing the importance of market structure clarity. Patrick Witt, Director of the President’s Digital Assets Advisory Council, has reiterated that passage is a matter of timing, not possibility.

Benchmark analyst Mark Palmer adds that while failure to pass the bill would not permanently damage the sector, it would limit the growth potential of the U.S. crypto market.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post A Pivotal Week for U.S. Crypto Bill appeared first on Coin Engineer.

The Senate Banking Committee plans a hearing for mid-December, but timing issues remain. Experts emphasize the importance of clear crypto regulations to protect investors and maintain market stability.

Senator Moreno Warns: “A Bad Bill Is Worse”

At the Blockchain Association Policy Summit, Moreno addressed ongoing debates on the bill’s content. He stated, “I don’t want to push through a bad bill just to say we passed something. There is no better deal than a bad deal.”

Moreno also announced plans to meet with Democrats to understand their perspectives. However, he complained that recent weeks’ discussions have been “quite frustrating.” Reports indicate that the House and Senate have developed different versions of a crypto market structure bill, which now need to be reconciled.

The House approved the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, known as Clarity, in July. The legislation focuses on regulating the crypto ecosystem. Passing bills in the Senate remains more challenging than in the House.

Collaboration Between Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees

The Senate Banking Committee is preparing its own version of the crypto market structure bill. Under Republican leadership, the draft aims to define jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC. It also introduces a new term to categorize ancillary assets, clarifying which cryptocurrencies are not considered securities.

For the bill to move forward, collaboration with the Senate Agriculture Committee is needed. Last month, the Agriculture Committee shared a draft that would grant new powers to the CFTC. Both drafts must undergo critical processes before being presented for voting.

Uncertainty Surrounds Upcoming Committee Markup Hearing

Reliable sources revealed that Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott said a practical way exists to hold the markup hearing on December 17 or 18. However, Democratic Senator Mark Warner emphasized it may be difficult to finalize the hearing before the holidays.

Warner noted that the committee is awaiting guidance from the White House regarding quorum and ethics issues. Senate Banking Committee members continue to wait for this guidance to confirm the markup session timing.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post US Senate Crypto Bill Faces Roadblocks appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Downing said in a statement, “Alternative investments can strengthen the financial security of millions of Americans saving for retirement. I commend President Trump’s leadership in democratizing finance and am proud to lead this effort in Congress.”

Background: Trump’s Order and Policy Shift

On August 7, 2025, Trump signed an order directing the Department of Labor (DOL), SEC, and Treasury to explore ways to expand access to alternative assets in 401(k) plans. The move reversed the Biden administration’s 2022 guidance, which warned against crypto exposure due to high volatility and investor risk.

Under Trump’s leadership, the restrictions were lifted in May 2025.The administration supported more access to digital assets and private equity for long-term portfolios. The new bill aims to lock in that change and prevent future policy swings.

Support, Concerns, and What’s Next

The proposal has four Republican co-sponsors: Byron Donalds, Buddy Carter, Warren Davidson, and Barry Moore. Sources say there is no Senate version of the bill yet.

Supporters argue that the plan will diversify portfolios and improve long-term returns. Critics warn about market risks, high fees, and unsuitable products for average investors. The DOL’s final rule must balance freedom and protection for plan participants.

Experts estimate that America’s $12 trillion retirement fund market could bring huge capital into crypto if the bill passes. As Politico and Reuters reported, the effort aims to give Trump’s “financial democratization” policy lasting legal force.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Republicans Push Bill to Legalize Trump 401(k) Crypto Order appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Crypto Week Ends in Victory: Three Bills Approved at Once

On July 18, 2025, a crucial vote in the U.S. House marked a new chapter in crypto history. All eyes were on three landmark proposals. All three bills passed, representing a major step forward for the sector:

• Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act: Passed with a 294-134 vote. This bill clarifies which regulatory body has jurisdiction over digital assets, aiming to resolve the ongoing SEC-CFTC conflict.

• GENIUS Act: Approved by a 308-122 vote. It lays out the first federal regulatory framework for the stablecoin sector.

• Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act: Passed with a narrower margin of 219-210. This bill prohibits the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC).

Trump Speaks: “American Genius!”

President Trump, who previously voiced his support for the GENIUS Act, made a statement ahead of today’s signing ceremony:

“We will hold an important signing ceremony at the White House today. This will be one of the greatest examples of American Genius. Through Digital Assets, we will show the world how to win!”

This evening’s event not only marks a legislative breakthrough but also sets the stage for the next era in the global blockchain economy.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Historic Moment: Crypto Bill to Be Signed Tonight! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

What the Bill Includes

• A reserve fund made of seized digital assets from criminal proceedings.
• The state treasurer can invest up to 10% of the fund in digital assets per fiscal year.
• Loans can be made from the fund to boost returns, as long as risk remains controlled.

You Might Be Interested In: Elon Musk Talks About the Name of a New Memecoin!

However, Governor Hobbs has recently vetoed 15 bills in one week and pledged to block all legislation until a disability funding bill is passed.

US States in the Bitcoin Reserve Race

Arizona is also advancing SB 1025, a separate bill focused solely on Bitcoin (BTC), allowing public retirement systems and the treasury to allocate up to 10% in BTC.

Other states like Texas, Utah, and New Hampshire have proposed similar legislation. But according to Bitcoin Laws founder Julian Fahrer, Texas may be the first to succeed due to fewer political hurdles.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Arizona Crypto Reserve Bill One Step from Becoming Law! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Under SB1797, any digital asset business serving Illinois residents must register with the state’s financial regulator. It also mandates clear and advance disclosure of all user fees.

You Might Be Interested In: Elon Musk Talks About the Name of a New Memecoin!

“A person shall not engage in digital asset business activity […] unless registered in this State by the Department,” the bill reads.

Memecoin Scams Spark Regulatory Crackdown!

The bill follows a string of memecoin scams, including the infamous Libra token, where insiders allegedly pulled over $107 million in liquidity. The token price crashed 94%, erasing nearly $4 billion in market value.

Anastasija Plotnikova, CEO of Fideum, commented: “These activities are not only unethical but also clearly illegal, with case law to support enforcement.”

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Illinois Senate Approves Crypto Bill to Combat Fraud and Rug Pulls appeared first on Coin Engineer.