For investors, the key question is whether this coordination marks a structural shift or remains a symbolic gesture.

A Push for Regulatory Alignment

The decision by the SEC and CFTC to meet reflects growing pressure to clarify long-standing jurisdictional overlaps. Under President Trump’s digital asset agenda, crypto policy is no longer framed solely as a compliance issue but as a strategic positioning tool. SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins openly acknowledged that legacy regulatory boundaries no longer match how modern crypto markets operate.

From the CFTC’s perspective, alignment is also tied to competitiveness. Officials have emphasized that regulatory uncertainty risks pushing innovation offshore. Still, markets remain cautious. Coordination between agencies does not automatically translate into legislative progress, and that gap continues to weigh on sentiment.

CLARITY Act Delays Add Pressure

At the center of the debate sits the CLARITY Act, which has struggled to advance in the Senate. A draft released by the Banking Committee earlier this year triggered strong backlash from parts of the crypto industry, leading to postponed markups. Meanwhile, the Senate Agriculture Committee introduced a separate, more partisan draft.

Notably, its planned markup date coincides with the SEC–CFTC meeting, intensifying the sense of a compressed and fragile timeline. With the Banking Committee shifting attention to other priorities, expectations that the bill could move forward quickly have faded. Some lawmakers now point to March, though confidence remains thin.

Market Confidence Continues to Erode

Prediction market data from Polymarket highlights the growing skepticism. Odds that the CLARITY Act will be signed into law in 2026 have dropped sharply from recent highs, reflecting doubts about political alignment and industry consensus.

Internal divisions have become more visible. Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson recently criticized Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse’s support for the bill, rejecting the argument that a flawed framework is better than regulatory limbo. These disagreements reinforce the perception that U.S. crypto regulation remains unsettled at its core.

White House Optimism Meets Market Caution

The White House has maintained that crypto legislation will eventually pass, urging industry leaders and policymakers to find common ground. Yet markets have not priced in that optimism. As delays persist, uncertainty premiums remain elevated, challenging the narrative of the U.S. as a future global crypto hub.

The outcome of the SEC–CFTC talks may influence short-term expectations. However, without a clear legislative roadmap, coordination alone may struggle to restore confidence.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post U.S. Crypto Regulation Faces a Critical Day: SEC–CFTC appeared first on Coin Engineer.

According to Bloomberg-sourced reporting, the Senate Banking Committee’s decision to shift its focus toward Trump’s housing affordability initiative has likely pushed consideration of the crypto market structure bill into late February or March.

Trump’s Davos Crypto Message: Urgency from the White House

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, President Trump expressed optimism that crypto market structure legislation could be signed into law “very soon.” He emphasized that Congress is actively working on the issue and briefly departed from his prepared remarks to underscore his point, adding, “Bitcoin — all of them.”

The timing of the statement was notable. It came only days after the Senate Banking Committee abruptly canceled a scheduled markup session for the bill. Viewed in context, Trump’s remarks appeared to be a direct attempt to apply public pressure on lawmakers to accelerate the process.

A Split Legislative Path for Crypto: Two Committees, One Framework

The proposed crypto market structure framework is advancing through two separate Senate committees, each responsible for different regulatory domains:

• The Senate Banking Committee, which oversees securities regulation and broader financial policy

• The Senate Agriculture Committee, which handles commodity markets and CFTC jurisdiction

For the legislation to reach the Senate floor, both committees must pass their respective bills and reconcile them into a single, unified framework.

Progress, however, has been uneven. The Banking Committee postponed its planned markup after Coinbase withdrew its support for the bill. In the following week, the committee redirected its attention toward housing policy, delaying crypto-related discussions further. As a result, the earliest realistic window for revisiting the bill now appears to be late February or March.

In contrast, the Agriculture Committee has continued moving forward. Chairman John Boozman released the text of the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act and confirmed that a markup session is scheduled for January 27. Still, Boozman acknowledged that bipartisan negotiations with Senator Cory Booker failed to produce an agreement.

The Central Dispute: Stablecoin Yield

At the heart of the legislative impasse lies a dispute over stablecoin yield.

Under the GENIUS Act, signed by President Trump last year, stablecoin holders are permitted to earn rewards or yield — effectively interest-like returns. In some cases, these yields can surpass those offered by traditional bank deposits.

This has triggered strong opposition from banking industry lobbyists, who are pushing lawmakers to restrict or eliminate stablecoin yield provisions in the new market structure bill.

Coinbase has drawn a firm line on this issue. CEO Brian Armstrong announced that the company withdrew its support for the legislation precisely because of these proposed restrictions, stating that “no bill is better than a bad bill.”

In comments delivered during the Davos forum, Armstrong accused banking associations of attempting to suppress competition, arguing that such efforts run counter to fundamental American principles.

White House Pushback Against Industry Resistance

Coinbase’s stance prompted a sharp response from the Trump administration. Patrick Witt, executive director of the president’s digital assets council, publicly criticized Armstrong’s position.

Witt emphasized that the current pro-crypto regulatory environment exists largely because of Trump’s electoral victory and policy direction. He warned that resistance from within the crypto industry itself could undermine a rare opportunity to establish a favorable regulatory framework, potentially resulting in serious long-term consequences.

Lawmakers Warn of a Narrow Window

Frustration is growing among legislators as the bill stalls. Senator Cynthia Lummis, a long-time crypto advocate who is set to retire next year, openly expressed disappointment with the pace of progress and noted that time is running out to finalize meaningful legislation.

Industry leaders share similar concerns. Blockchain Association CEO Peter Smith cautioned that failure to pass the bill now could push the issue beyond the upcoming midterm elections, effectively delaying comprehensive regulation by at least two more years.

Representative William Timmons highlighted the economic stakes, arguing that a clear and competitive regulatory framework could bring tens of billions of dollars back into the U.S. crypto sector. Without it, he warned, crypto innovation and capital may continue migrating overseas.

Markets Move Faster Than Lawmakers

While Congress debates, financial markets are already adapting. The New York Stock Exchange recently announced plans to launch a blockchain-based platform for tokenized securities, offering instant settlement and around-the-clock trading.

Senator Thom Tillis pointed to developments like these as evidence that crypto is no longer a peripheral issue. In his view, maintaining the United States’ leadership in global finance now requires getting crypto regulation right, as digital assets are becoming an integral component of modern banking systems.

What Happens Next?

The current landscape reveals clearly defined positions:

• The Trump administration is pushing for rapid passage

• Coinbase considers restrictions on stablecoin yield a non-negotiable red line

• Banking lobbyists remain committed to keeping those restrictions in place

Although the Agriculture Committee appears set to advance its bill, a complete market structure framework cannot materialize without action from the Banking Committee. Ultimately, the unresolved conflict over stablecoin yield will determine whether the legislation moves forward — or stalls indefinitely.

What is increasingly clear is that time is becoming a critical factor. Each delay raises the risk that the United States could lose its competitive edge in shaping the future of global crypto markets.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Why Is Crypto Legislation Stuck in U.S. Congress? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Midterm Warning: “They’ll Impeach Me”

Trump addressed Republican Congress members and stressed the critical importance of the midterms. He claimed that if Democrats control the House, they will find a reason to remove him from office:

“You must win the midterms. Because if we don’t, they’ll find a way to impeach me. I will be impeached.”

Polls and Betting Markets

Trump’s warning follows declining approval ratings. Rising living costs and his handling of the Epstein files have divided the Republican base, pushing his approval down to 42%.

Polymarket bettors assign an 80% chance that Democrats will take the House. Republicans still hold a 67% chance of keeping control of the Senate.

Crypto Policy at Risk

The midterms could affect more than just political control—they may shape the administration’s economic agenda. Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott plans to bring the crypto market structure bill to a vote next Thursday. A Democratic House could stall this legislation.

Democrats like Sean Casten and Jon Ossoff already criticize Trump’s crypto dealings, including a private dinner with top memecoin holders, as unethical.

GOP CBDC Rift

Trump’s crypto plans also face resistance within his party. Last year, a conservative faction blocked crypto legislation until the Republicans added a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) ban. Party leaders initially promised to include it in a must-pass defense bill but later passed the bill without the ban, angering some GOP members. The future of bills like the GENIUS Act remains uncertain.

Could Trump Be Removed?

A third impeachment would mark a historic first in US history. Trump faced two impeachments during his first term—once in 2019 over Ukraine interference in the 2020 election, and again in January 2021 after the January 6 Capitol attack. The Senate acquitted him both times.

Experts warn that a Democratic-controlled House could block key legislation and complicate Trump’s final two years in office.

Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, please follow us on our Telegram, YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Trump: “They’ll Remove Me If We Lose the Election!” appeared first on Coin Engineer.

The signal is not subtle. Draft agendas have been shared with lobbyists this week, and the same date has surfaced in senior staff briefings. This is no longer background noise. It is an institutional step that indicates real procedural momentum.

Markets Are Positioning Before the Text Is Final

Price action began before any vote. Ethereum rose roughly 0.3% intraday, extending its monthly gain to nearly 5% as it traded around $2,965. Solana advanced about 1.4% on the day, with modest monthly gains, holding near $124.

These moves could be read as technical. Still, the underlying driver appears more political than chart-based. Markets are beginning to price the direction of regulatory pressure, even without clarity on the final language. Even before the final text is released, the crypto market is beginning to price in a potential shift in regulatory pressure.

What the CLARITY Act Is Trying to Do

Under the current draft, the bill draws a clear regulatory line. Fungible tokens that are sufficiently decentralized and not classified as securities would fall primarily under the CFTC’s authority. Tokens tied to ongoing governance efforts, or offering yield or revenue-sharing features, would sit firmly within the SEC’s regime.

This distinction is not new. It largely mirrors how recent SEC enforcement actions have treated digital assets. The difference now is structural. What was previously enforced through interpretation is being written directly into statute, narrowing gray areas while creating new points of tension.

A Narrow Safe Zone for DeFi

Lobbyists who reviewed the December draft say the bill takes a targeted approach to DeFi. Front-end operators, order-routing interfaces, and fee-collecting DAOs would be treated as registrable entities. Immutable, non-upgradable, and non-fee-generating smart contracts would be left a limited safe harbor.

The result is not a free pass for DeFi. Instead, the framework targets control points—interfaces and economic leverage—rather than protocol code itself. That design choice explains why uncertainty remains around how flexible the regime would be in practice.

Political Momentum, Still Fragile

Prediction markets suggest rising confidence that lawmakers could break the deadlock this cycle. On Kalshi, contracts tied to the adoption of a comprehensive federal digital asset framework by mid-2026 are trading at meaningfully higher probabilities than earlier in the year.

Still, these markets have been wrong before. Between 2023 and 2025, House-led crypto initiatives repeatedly stalled after reaching the Senate, leaving unfinished legislation in their wake.

The 60-Vote Reality

Even if the CLARITY Act clears the Banking Committee, the hardest hurdle remains. Sixty votes on the Senate floor are required. Without bipartisan support, that threshold is difficult to reach.

Committee members have privately signaled they want to avoid repeating prior cycles, where House-approved digital asset packages quietly died in the Senate. Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott summarized the stated goal in a July 2025 discussion draft: protecting investors, supporting innovation, and keeping the future of digital finance anchored in the US. Few dispute the objective. The disagreement lies in the details.

What Institutional Flows Are Signaling

Capital has not waited for legal certainty. Data from late December shows Ethereum attracting more than $1.3 billion in new institutional staking inflows. Solana, after a sharp recovery from its 2022 lows, continues to draw capital seeking higher beta exposure.

These flows suggest markets are not ruling out a shift away from enforcement-driven oversight toward a more functional regulatory regime. Still, expectation is not assurance.

Why It Matters

A CLARITY Act that clears committee could establish a clear CFTC path for sufficiently decentralized Layer 1 networks. It could also define a workable registration framework for DeFi front ends and place explicit limits on reward-like stablecoin yields. Together, those changes would reduce headline risk for Ethereum-based yield strategies and Solana liquidity, while making it easier for large US platforms to list and collateralize a broader range of tokens.

January 15 is not just another committee date; for the crypto market, it represents a directional test with consequences that may extend well beyond this cycle.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post A Critical Process Begins for the Crypto Market in the US appeared first on Coin Engineer.

The decision reinforces regulatory uncertainty across crypto markets. Ongoing disputes over DeFi oversight and market supervision continue to block consensus. Investors are actively pricing in U.S.-driven regulatory risk as clarity slips further away.

Why it matters?
The CLARITY Act aims to define how crypto assets are regulated and which agencies hold authority. Delays keep institutional caution elevated and sustain uncertainty premiums across digital asset markets.

Why the CLARITY Act Will Not Pass in 2025

Senator John Kennedy, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, said the bill is not ready for a final vote. He noted progress in negotiations but emphasized that key disagreements remain unresolved. As a result, the Senate lacks the support needed to advance the legislation.

Lawmakers originally targeted a vote later this year. However, committee markups were postponed again. The earliest realistic window for action now points to January 2026, extending the regulatory timeline by at least another year.

Tim Scott Confirms the Revised Timeline

Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott confirmed that work on the CLARITY Act will restart in early 2026. He said the Senate and House versions carry different names but function as a single crypto market structure framework.

Scott accused Democrats of deliberately slowing the process. He argued that political resistance has effectively frozen progress. Despite this, he maintained optimism that the Senate could consider a vote early next year.

DeFi Disputes and Political Tensions Intensify

While bipartisan support exists for clearer crypto rules, DeFi regulation remains deeply divisive. In October, Senate Democrats introduced proposals requiring identity verification and strict anti-money-laundering compliance for DeFi platforms. The industry strongly opposed the move.

Republican lawmakers warned that such requirements could cripple DeFi activity in the United States. At the same time, some Democrats argue that advancing crypto legislation would legitimize business ventures linked to President Donald Trump.

These include a Trump-branded meme coin, the World Liberty Financial DeFi project, and American Bitcoin, a mining firm co-founded by Eric and Donald Trump Jr. Representative Maxine Waters previously said passing these bills would make Congress complicit in what she described as presidential crypto corruption.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post CLARITY Act Delayed in Senate, U.S. Crypto Law Pushed to 2026 appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Due to the shutdown, Congress has missed several critical deadlines. The most notable was the price increase hearing scheduled for October 20 related to the market structure bill. These delays have pushed crypto legislation further down the priority list.

Legislative Time and Competing Priorities

Ron Hammond, Head of Policy and Advocacy at Wintermute, notes that Congress will face conflicting priorities toward the end of the year. Mandatory military spending, such as the National Defense Authorization Act, will take precedence. Other bills may fall behind due to limited time and the ongoing shutdown.

There is still hope for crypto legislation. The Senate Agriculture Committee’s draft market structure bill remains a key development to follow. The draft could provide an indication of the overall legislative package’s progress and may move to a review session around Thanksgiving for a possible vote.

Political Developments and Crypto Implications

During the shutdown, Democrats may drop demands to lower health insurance premiums. This change is linked to the Trump administration resuming the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Two federal judges recently ordered that SNAP benefits continue, which could shift the political balance.

Meanwhile, legal cases such as Sam Bankman-Fried’s appeal hearing and the Samourai Wallet developers’ charges directly affect the cryptocurrency regulatory framework. Because of these cases and the ongoing shutdown, Congress is delayed in addressing crypto bills.

• The U.S. government shutdown began on October 1, 2025.

• Currently, it is the second-longest shutdown; a 35-day record may be reached.

• Congress has missed critical crypto legislation deadlines.

• The Senate Agriculture Committee draft could progress around Thanksgiving.

• Democrats may compromise on SNAP benefits and health insurance premiums.

Each day of the shutdown reduces the time Congress has to address legislation. Crypto bills must compete with other priorities for limited session time. Developments in Washington suggest that the likelihood of completing crypto regulations this year has decreased.

Also, in the comment section, you can freely share your comments and opinions about the topic. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on Telegram, YouTube and Twitter for the latest news and updates.

The post Government Shutdown Hits Crypto Legislation in the U.S.! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Crypto Leaders Discuss Regulation Reform with the Senate

The U.S. crypto industry is set for one of its most crucial meetings this year. Leaders such as Brian Armstrong (Coinbase CEO), Stuart Alderoty (Ripple CLO), and Hayden Adams (Uniswap CEO) will join Senate Democrats to debate the future of digital asset regulation.

Topics include the separation of custody and brokerage in spot and derivatives trading, exchange licensing frameworks, and KYC/AML compliance. These discussions could reshape how DeFi and centralized platforms operate across the U.S. market.

Meanwhile, investors are watching closely, as regulatory uncertainty has historically triggered volatility in Bitcoin and Ethereum prices.

DeFi Draft Sparks Tension Across the Crypto Industry

A leaked DeFi regulatory draft attributed to Senate Democrats has caused shockwaves across the crypto community. Critics argue the draft could stifle innovation and contradict the core principles of decentralization.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong condemned the proposal, calling it “a bad idea that would undermine innovation.”

“This would set the U.S. back and prevent it from becoming the global crypto capital. But lawmaking is a process — and we’ll keep fighting for your economic freedom.” — Brian Armstrong, Coinbase

At the same time, Miles Jennings, General Counsel at a16z crypto, emphasized the urgent need for a “clear and consistent regulatory framework” to foster innovation while ensuring investor protection.

Who’s at the Table: Key Participants in Washington

The meeting gathers the most influential figures in the trillion-dollar crypto market:

• Brian Armstrong – CEO, Coinbase

• Sergey Nazarov – CEO, Chainlink

• Mike Novogratz – CEO, Galaxy Digital

• David Ripley – CEO, Kraken

• Hayden Adams – CEO, Uniswap

• Kathleen Smith – Head, Solana Policy Institute

• Dante Disparte – CSO, Circle

• Stuart Alderoty – CLO, Ripple

• Rebecca Rettig – CLO, Jito

• Miles Jennings – General Counsel, a16z crypto

The agenda includes stablecoin regulation, DeFi supervision architecture, and exchange licensing schemes. The outcomes could set the tone for future policymaking in the United States.

Potential Impact on Crypto Markets

Analysts believe that the results of this meeting could reshape the U.S. crypto competitiveness on a global scale. Prolonged uncertainty has already led to capital flight and developer migration from the U.S.

A balanced framework could attract institutional investors and strengthen user confidence. However, overly restrictive measures may slow down innovation and cause short-term market turbulence.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Crypto Leaders Discuss Regulation Reform with the Senate appeared first on Coin Engineer.

The GENIUS Act provides a national innovation framework for stablecoins. The CLARITY Act establishes legal infrastructure for the digital asset market. The Anti-CBDC bill aims to restrict the Federal Reserve’s development of a digital currency. 

Trump-Supported GENIUS Act Had Already Passed the Senate 

Former President Donald Trump had previously announced plans to rapidly advance his crypto agenda. As part of this, Republican lawmakers prepared a “crypto week” for this week and urged all party members to support the bills. 

The GENIUS Act had been approved by the Senate in June. Trump is expected to sign the bill on Friday, provided there are no further changes. Some Democrats criticized the process, citing conflicts of interest and corruption suspicions. 

Meanwhile, before the vote, some Republicans who demanded special regulations banning CBDCs temporarily blocked the process for several hours. However, the bills were ultimately approved with support from Republicans and more Democrats than expected. Approximately 80 Democrats voted “yes” for the CLARITY Act, and over 100 supported the GENIUS Act. 

CBDC Debates Intensify, FED in the Spotlight 

The Federal Reserve’s digital currency development has faced longstanding criticism from conservatives. The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act argues that this development could be a “secret surveillance tool” and calls for its ban. Republican lawmakers support the bill on grounds of protecting individual privacy. 

However, many experts believe this bill risks blocking not only the FED but all digital currency initiatives. Meanwhile, actors in the tech and finance sectors believe these regulations could eliminate uncertainties for the digital asset ecosystem. 

Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, please follow us on our Telegram, YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post US Approves Crypto: Three Key Bills Passed by Congress!  appeared first on Coin Engineer.

The US House of Representatives conducted a crucial vote on July 15, 2025, regarding three major cryptocurrency bills. The bills included stablecoin regulation, general crypto market oversight, and a ban on central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). However, the bills failed to pass due to strong opposition from the Republican Party’s right wing. The vote resulted in 196 in favor and 223 against, leading to the bills’ rejection. This outcome represents a significant obstacle for crypto regulations in the United States. 

Republican Party Divisions Block Regulations 

Among the bills, the most debated was the GENIUS Act, aimed at increasing transparency for stablecoins. The other two bills were the CLARITY Act and the Anti-CBDC Act. However, some Republican representatives demanded the bills be presented as a unified package rather than separately. This stance caused the vote to fail. President Donald Trump’s declared “Crypto Week” faced setbacks due to internal party disputes. 

This development heightened uncertainty in crypto markets. Shares of major crypto firms like Circle and Coinbase declined following the bills’ rejection. Bitcoin also fell by approximately 3%. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Majority Leader Steve Scalise announced plans to reintroduce the bills. However, internal Republican divisions may continue to hinder regulatory progress. 

Details of Important Crypto Bills 

The GENIUS Act sought to regulate stablecoins and enhance market security. The CLARITY Act proposed broader crypto market regulations. The Anti-CBDC Act aimed to ban central bank digital currencies. These bills sparked considerable attention within the crypto ecosystem but failed to advance due to political conflicts. 

This process holds critical importance for the future of crypto regulations in the US. Investors and market participants await clearer legislation, while ongoing obstacles increase uncertainty. Meanwhile, House leadership signaled that similar bills may return for consideration soon. 

In summary, the rejection of three key crypto bills by the US House caused market turbulence. Divisions within the Republican Party remain a serious barrier to regulation. This event marks a critical development for crypto investors to monitor closely. 

You can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates

The post Crypto Bill Rejections Shock US House in Critical Vote! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

CLARITY and GENIUS Votes 

Among the key regulations during Crypto Week, the 2025 Digital Asset Market Structure Clarity Act (CLARITY) stands out. This bill seeks to end the regulatory turf war between the SEC and CFTC. It also aims to bring clarity to asset classifications and prevent legal ambiguities like the Ripple vs. SEC case. This has implications for both individual and institutional investors. 

Meanwhile, the Guiding National Innovation and Ensuring Uniformity in Stablecoins Act (GENIUS) introduces strict safety requirements for stablecoin issuance. Passed in the Senate in June, it mandates 1:1 cash reserves, formal registration, and compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) laws. It’s also designed to prevent collapses like Terra (UST). Some officials propose combining both bills into a single comprehensive package. 

CBDC Ban and Political Tensions 

Another major proposal during Crypto Week is the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which seeks to block the Federal Reserve from issuing a digital dollar. Supporters argue that a CBDC could undermine financial privacy and enable centralized surveillance. 

However, Democrats have launched a counter-campaign named “Anti-Crypto Corruption Week”, accusing the CLARITY and GENIUS bills of serving Donald Trump’s interests. 

Additionally, on Tuesday, July 15 at 3:00 PM, the Senate Agriculture Committee will hold a session on market structure legislation. On Wednesday, July 16 9:00 am ET, the House Ways and Means Committee will discuss crypto taxation. 

You can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates

The post Crypto Week: U.S. to Vote on Major Crypto Laws appeared first on Coin Engineer.