What stands out is not just the scale of these failures, but how unevenly they are distributed over time. Project closures did not accumulate gradually. Instead, they clustered sharply into a single period. 2025 emerged as a clear breaking point for the crypto market.

Before that shift, annual failure numbers remained relatively contained. Prior to 2024, yearly crypto project shutdowns stayed in the low six figures. In fact, all failures recorded between 2021 and 2023 accounted for just 3.4% of total closures since 2021.

The dynamic changed as token creation tools gained momentum. Platforms such as Solana-based meme coin launchpad Pump.fun significantly lowered the cost and friction of issuing new tokens. As production accelerated, the market absorbed a growing number of short-lived projects. When pressure increased, closures no longer spread across years — they concentrated.

2025 Data Breaks Away From the Trend

In 2025 alone, 11.6 million tokens failed. That figure represents 86.3% of all crypto project shutdowns recorded between 2021 and 2025.

Earlier years look modest by comparison. In 2021, only 2,584 projects closed. The number rose to 213,075 in 2022 and 245,049 in 2023. By 2024, closures accelerated to roughly 1.38 million.

Then came 2025 — and the curve detached entirely.

More Projects, Less Structural Resilience

Over the same period, the total number of listed crypto projects expanded rapidly. CoinGecko data shows listings increased from 428,383 projects in 2021 to roughly 20.2 million by 2025. The ease of launching tokens played a decisive role in this expansion, opening the door to large volumes of low-effort and speculative projects.

A substantial portion of that growth came from the meme coin segment. Attention and liquidity, however, did not scale at the same speed. As a result, structurally weaker tokens were far more exposed when market conditions tightened.

Fourth Quarter Pressure Intensified the Washout

The final quarter of 2025 marked the most concentrated phase of the collapse. Approximately 7.7 million tokens stopped trading within just three months, accounting for 34.9% of all recorded crypto project failures to date.

This period coincided with heightened market stress and large-scale liquidations. A wave of leveraged position unwinding in October amplified pressure on already fragile projects, accelerating exits for tokens that were struggling to sustain activity.

Taken together, the data highlights a simple reality: growth in numbers does not automatically translate into market strength. As the crypto ecosystem expanded, selectivity increased alongside it. Projects built on short-term interest proved far more vulnerable once conditions shifted.

Whether the bulk of this cleansing process is complete remains unclear. What is evident, however, is that 2025 reshaped the failure curve — not gradually, but decisively.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post 11 Million Crypto Tokens Collapsed in 2025 appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Why Competition Between Bitcoin and the Dollar Matters

Brian Armstrong said in a post on X that Bitcoin creates a form of competition that ultimately benefits the US dollar. Rather than replacing it, Bitcoin introduces an external reference point that pressures policymakers during periods of rising deficits and expanding public debt. In this context, Bitcoin functions as a financial constraint rather than a rival currency.

At the same time, Armstrong emphasized that Bitcoin is not designed to displace the dollar directly. Instead, he believes its existence encourages more responsible fiscal decision-making by adding transparency and long-term accountability to the system.

Meanwhile, the US public debt has surpassed $38 trillion. With the debt-to-GDP ratio now above 120%, the discussion has moved beyond theory. As a result, Bitcoin is increasingly framed within broader macroeconomic fragilities rather than speculative narratives.

Still, Armstrong underlined that a strong US economy remains essential for global stability. He stressed that Bitcoin’s role is complementary, not adversarial, and that healthy competition can reinforce confidence in the dollar over time.

“I love Bitcoin, but a strong America is also critically important for the world,” Armstrong said.

A Structural Shift in the Crypto Market

At the same time, Coinbase Institutional research points to a major transformation in crypto market dynamics. Analysts observe that retail-driven speculation and meme-coin activity are fading. In their place, institutional capital and professional trading infrastructure are taking the lead.

One of the most significant changes is the dominance of perpetual futures on major exchanges. Unlike earlier market cycles, price movements are now shaped less by simple buying and selling and more by leverage, funding rates, and liquidity conditions.

Previously, spot market demand largely dictated price direction. Today, derivatives markets increasingly influence short-term volatility and trend formation. As a result, the crypto market is becoming more sophisticated but also more complex.

Key behavioral shifts include:

• Retail investor influence continues to decline

• Institutional risk management is gaining importance

• Derivatives markets increasingly guide spot prices

Taken together, these trends suggest that the so-called “Wild West” phase of crypto markets is drawing to a close.

GENIUS Act Debate and the Stablecoin Tension

Another major issue raised by Armstrong is the debate surrounding the GENIUS Act. He strongly criticized efforts to reopen the legislation, arguing that traditional banks are lobbying to curb competition from stablecoins and fintech platforms. In his view, such moves would slow innovation rather than improve consumer protection.

Stablecoin yields, in particular, challenge the traditional banking model. While banks earn roughly 4% on reserves held at the Federal Reserve, everyday consumers receive little to no return on standard savings accounts. Armstrong and other industry voices argue that stablecoin rewards help rebalance this disparity in favor of users.

They also note that available research does not indicate widespread deposit flight from smaller banks. Despite safety concerns raised by incumbents, stablecoins have not triggered systemic stress in the banking sector so far.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Bitcoin, Not a Threat to the Dollar, Says Coinbase CEO appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Institutional Players Tighten Control Over Bitcoin Supply

Bitcoin ownership has become increasingly concentrated among institutions, custodians, and large holders in 2025. According to Glassnode, major entities now control approximately 5.94 million BTC. This figure represents close to 30 percent of the circulating Bitcoin supply. As a result, the influence of retail investors over available supply continues to decline.

Moreover, this concentration reflects Bitcoin’s transition into a maturing institutional asset. Large holders tend to accumulate with long-term strategies, which reduces liquid supply in the market. Consequently, price movements are increasingly shaped by institutional portfolio decisions rather than short-term retail flows. This shift also changes volatility dynamics across market cycles.

Why does it matter?

As Bitcoin supply concentrates in institutional hands, price discovery becomes more sensitive to corporate and fund-level decisions. This alters risk behavior and strengthens Bitcoin’s connection to traditional financial structures.

ETFs, Corporations, and Governments Accumulate BTC

Publicly listed companies currently hold around 1.07 million BTC. Strategy remains the dominant corporate holder with 660,624 BTC, far ahead of its peers. MARA Holdings follows with 53,250 BTC, while Twenty One Capital holds 43,514 BTC. Japan-based Metaplanet controls 30,823 BTC, closely followed by Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company and Bullish.

At the same time, US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs collectively manage approximately 1.31 million BTC. Government wallets also play a notable role, holding an estimated 620,000 BTC. However, cryptocurrency exchanges remain the single largest category. Glassnode data shows exchanges holding roughly 2.94 million BTC, underscoring their central role in market liquidity.

Major Bitcoin holder categories

• Public companies with Bitcoin treasuries

• US spot Bitcoin ETFs

• Government-controlled wallets

• Centralized cryptocurrency exchanges

Price Pressure Persists Despite Institutional Confidence

Despite growing institutional accumulation, Bitcoin’s price action still reflects broader macro conditions. This week, BTC briefly dipped below the 90,000 dollar level amid weakness in the technology sector and ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty. This movement highlights Bitcoin’s continued correlation with risk assets.

Nevertheless, institutional conviction remains intact. Ark Invest, led by Cathie Wood, purchased 13,700 shares of its own Bitcoin ETF, ARKB, during the pullback. The acquisition, valued at roughly 417,000 dollars, signals sustained confidence. Meanwhile, Strategy has maintained its position in the Nasdaq 100 index for a full year, even as debate continues around the long-term sustainability of crypto treasury models.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Bitcoin Supply Shifts to Institutions: Glassnode Data appeared first on Coin Engineer.

The bill outlines the jurisdiction of the country’s two main financial regulators. Committee Chair Republican John Boozman emphasized that the CFTC is the right body to oversee digital commodity trading, highlighting the importance of investor protection and market clarity. Democratic Senator Cory Booker noted that the draft gives the CFTC new powers over digital commodity spot markets and ensures that retail investors benefit from enhanced protections.

Key Goals: Clear Regulatory Boundaries

The draft bill also addresses common crypto terms such as “blockchain,” “decentralized finance,” and “DAOs,” clarifying how they fall under the Commodity Exchange Act. However, several sections remain in brackets, signaling that they are still open to change. This reflects ongoing negotiations, particularly regarding regulatory responsibilities shared with the Senate Banking Committee.

Minority members of the committee argue that the Agriculture Committee lacks jurisdiction over certain technical areas. They propose working with the Banking Committee on issues related to blockchain developers and service providers. The Banking Committee oversees the SEC, managing the securities-related sections of the bill.

Notably, the draft aligns with the CLARITY Act, passed by the House in July. CLARITY establishes the CFTC as the central authority in digital asset regulation, ensuring a unified market framework.

Crypto Industry Groups Support the Draft

Crypto advocacy group Crypto Innovation Council CEO Ji Hun Kim called the release of the draft a “meaningful step toward a comprehensive and purpose-driven market structure for digital assets in the US.” Coinbase’s lobbying arm, Stand with Crypto, described the bill as a key step toward the “common-sense regulatory framework” the industry has long requested.

Community Director Mason Lynaugh stressed that the Senate should act quickly and deliberately. He added that investor confidence and market stability depend on clear rules, positioning the US as a global standard-setter in crypto regulation.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Senate Committee Unveils Crypto Market Structure Bill appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Historic Increase in Bitcoin Long-Term Holder Supply  

On-chain analytics platform CryptoQuant reported that long-term Bitcoin holders (LTH) have increased their supply by 800,000 BTC over the last 30 days. This marks the largest recorded increase in Bitcoin history. LTH refers to investors who hold their BTC for at least six months. This surge indicates high confidence in the market.  

According to CryptoQuant data, a 750,000 BTC increase has only happened six times. The most recent two occurrences were in July 2021 and September 2024—both just before significant price surges.  

Analyst Darkfost stated that this is a signal that should not be ignored. Most coins were purchased in the $95,000–$107,000 range, which creates a strong support level for the price.  

“This is definitely a strong signal that should be included in any strategy.”  

Critical Support for Bitcoin: $93,000 Level  

Short-term holders (STH), who typically hold BTC for less than six months, have a cost basis just below $100,000. Glassnode emphasized that the $93,000–$98,000 range is a critical support zone. According to analysts, if BTC remains within this range, the bullish market structure will be maintained. However, if this level is broken, selling pressure could increase. Following the recent pullback, the price dropped to as low as $98,000. Despite this, the strong position of long-term holders shows the market remains resilient.  

Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, please follow us on our Telegram, YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Rare Bitcoin Move: Only Happened 6 Times!  appeared first on Coin Engineer.

On Sunday, Bitcoin briefly fell below $100,000. However, it quickly rebounded following US President Donald Trump’s announcement of a ceasefire. At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at $107,970. 

Macroeconomist Lyn Alden noted on Wednesday, “The dollar index is currently hovering at new cyclical lows.” Alden added, “There has been almost no safe haven bid in the past few weeks.” These comments have increased speculation that the dollar’s weakness might be structural rather than temporary. 

According to TradingView data, the dollar’s decline has driven investors toward riskier assets. Bitcoin (BTC), after brief dips, was trading at $107,930. During the same period, partial recovery in markets was observed following Trump’s fragile ceasefire announcement. 

Jamie Coutts: Cryptocurrencies are the New Emerging Markets 

Real Vision crypto analyst Jamie Coutts compared the current macro environment to the 2002-2008 period. Coutts said, “That period saw a major dollar devaluation, igniting a fire under emerging market equities and commodities.” He added, “EMs outperformed developed markets by 3x due to capital flows toward high-growth, youthful economies.” According to Coutts, a similar trend is now occurring in the crypto markets. 

“Crypto is today’s EM. Capital moves where the energy is,” Coutts summarized, highlighting capital flow toward Bitcoin and altcoins. With the dollar weakening, Bitcoin gaining strength positions crypto as the next-generation safe haven. 

Analysts suggest the weakening DXY presents a positive macro signal for crypto assets. While this hints at a possible altcoin season, it is clear that Bitcoin is currently the biggest winner. 

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post The US Dollar Index (DXY) Is Falling! How Will It Affect Crypto? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

You Might Be Interested In: Elon Musk Talks About the Name of a New Memecoin!

In response, Republican lawmakers rebranded the hearing as a “roundtable” to bypass procedural rules and continued discussions.

Crypto Regulation Becomes a Political Battlefield

Despite the political tension, HFSC Chair French Hill pushed forward with calls to build a lasting crypto regulatory framework. Democrats, however, raised concerns about Trump’s memecoin, his family’s ties to crypto firms, and a $2 billion investment involving USD1 stablecoin and Binance.

In protest, Democrats released draft legislation to ban the President, Vice President, members of Congress, and their families from owning or profiting from crypto. The bill also restricts them from holding leadership positions at digital asset companies.

As crypto legislation collides with politics, progress on the market structure bill may face serious delays. The battle over Trump’s crypto connections signals deeper divisions over the future of digital assets in the U.S.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Trump’s Crypto Ties Spark Chaos in U.S. Congress appeared first on Coin Engineer.