Momentum picked up after the Cabinet approved plans to align Thailand’s derivatives framework with international standards. Was it overdue? Possibly. But judging by statements from the SEC Secretary-General, the goal isn’t simply to follow trends. The intention is to build a more inclusive market. Instead of telling investors to just “buy and hold,” regulators want to offer modern tools that allow real risk management. This is where platforms like the Thailand Futures Exchange (TFEX) come into play, opening the door to crypto futures and options.

Digital Assets and Carbon Credits in the Same Basket

The SEC’s latest revisions expand the list of assets permitted in derivatives trading. It’s no longer limited to traditional commodities or financial indicators. Digital assets and carbon credits are now part of the framework. The aim is clear: broaden Thailand’s derivatives market while bringing it closer to global standards.

Technical details haven’t been finalized yet. Still, sources close to the process say contract structures for digital-asset-linked derivatives are expected to be released publicly in the coming days, with Bitcoin-focused instruments receiving priority.

At the same time, regulators stress balance. The Cabinet-approved package seeks deeper liquidity and market participation while maintaining oversight, risk controls, and investor protection. That emphasis matters — crypto remains politically sensitive.

A Framework for Bitcoin and Similar Assets

Under the revised rules, cryptocurrencies and other digital assets are officially recognized as legitimate investment classes for regulated derivatives. It may sound technical, but the implications are significant. In practice, this could allow Bitcoin-linked futures, options, and similar contracts to trade on platforms such as TFEX.

Not everything will happen overnight. But the direction is clear.

SEC Secretary-General Pornanong Budsaratragoon summarized the objective: expanding the range of permitted goods and variables under the Derivatives Act to support new product types. The language is familiar — broader market growth, more diversification, better risk management — except this time, crypto isn’t excluded.

Licensing Comes Next, Then the Mechanics

The SEC’s next steps are more technical, yet crucial. Operating licenses for derivatives providers will be amended to allow contracts referencing digital assets. Licensing and supervision frameworks for exchanges and clearing houses are also under review.

The regulator says it will work closely with TFEX to finalize contract specifications for digital-asset products. The focus is practical: risk management and real-world usability. Not just products that can exist — products that can actually trade.

A Regional Hub Strategy

Integrating digital assets into the derivatives market is part of Thailand’s broader ambition to position itself as a regional digital-economy hub. Earlier this year, the SEC also revealed plans for a comprehensive regulatory package covering crypto-related products and activities, including ETFs.

Timing, however, raises eyebrows. Some market participants view these reforms as delayed, primarily aimed at bringing digital asset activity under clearer legal structures. Regulators counter that disclosure requirements and capital standards will remain firmly in place.

“They Already Behave Like Financial Instruments”

Policy strategist and Gather Beyond founder Pichapen Prateepavanich sees it plainly: digital assets already function like financial instruments in practice. Regulation’s role isn’t to deny that reality — it’s to frame it.

That may be exactly what Thailand is doing. Crypto isn’t being glorified, and it isn’t being banned. It’s being invited to the same table as traditional finance. There are rules. There are risks. But ignoring it is no longer an option.

Bitcoin’s price remains relatively calm for now. Still, during Asian trading hours, attention has shifted elsewhere — derivatives volume. Will it pick up? Hard to say yet. Market chatter suggests TFEX-driven developments could quietly nudge regional liquidity in the short term.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Why Is Thailand Bringing Crypto Into Its Derivatives Market? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

For investors, the key question is whether this coordination marks a structural shift or remains a symbolic gesture.

A Push for Regulatory Alignment

The decision by the SEC and CFTC to meet reflects growing pressure to clarify long-standing jurisdictional overlaps. Under President Trump’s digital asset agenda, crypto policy is no longer framed solely as a compliance issue but as a strategic positioning tool. SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins openly acknowledged that legacy regulatory boundaries no longer match how modern crypto markets operate.

From the CFTC’s perspective, alignment is also tied to competitiveness. Officials have emphasized that regulatory uncertainty risks pushing innovation offshore. Still, markets remain cautious. Coordination between agencies does not automatically translate into legislative progress, and that gap continues to weigh on sentiment.

CLARITY Act Delays Add Pressure

At the center of the debate sits the CLARITY Act, which has struggled to advance in the Senate. A draft released by the Banking Committee earlier this year triggered strong backlash from parts of the crypto industry, leading to postponed markups. Meanwhile, the Senate Agriculture Committee introduced a separate, more partisan draft.

Notably, its planned markup date coincides with the SEC–CFTC meeting, intensifying the sense of a compressed and fragile timeline. With the Banking Committee shifting attention to other priorities, expectations that the bill could move forward quickly have faded. Some lawmakers now point to March, though confidence remains thin.

Market Confidence Continues to Erode

Prediction market data from Polymarket highlights the growing skepticism. Odds that the CLARITY Act will be signed into law in 2026 have dropped sharply from recent highs, reflecting doubts about political alignment and industry consensus.

Internal divisions have become more visible. Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson recently criticized Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse’s support for the bill, rejecting the argument that a flawed framework is better than regulatory limbo. These disagreements reinforce the perception that U.S. crypto regulation remains unsettled at its core.

White House Optimism Meets Market Caution

The White House has maintained that crypto legislation will eventually pass, urging industry leaders and policymakers to find common ground. Yet markets have not priced in that optimism. As delays persist, uncertainty premiums remain elevated, challenging the narrative of the U.S. as a future global crypto hub.

The outcome of the SEC–CFTC talks may influence short-term expectations. However, without a clear legislative roadmap, coordination alone may struggle to restore confidence.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post U.S. Crypto Regulation Faces a Critical Day: SEC–CFTC appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Bitcoin holding above $95,000, Ethereum maintaining the $3,300 range, and XRP staying above $2.05 indicate that investor sentiment is still bullish. Importantly, these levels are supported not only by technical momentum but also by increasing institutional positioning.

Clarity Act Delay and the Coinbase Factor

The Clarity Act, originally set for a mid-January vote in the U.S. Senate, has been indefinitely postponed, initially triggering negative sentiment. The process became even more complex when Coinbase withdrew its support for the bill. Official statements rejected political pressure as a factor, but behind the scenes, traditional financial players are reportedly influencing legislators.

Nevertheless, market consensus suggests the delay does not equate to cancellation. On the contrary, as the bill’s content becomes clearer and consensus widens, any eventual approval could have a stronger impact—explaining why investors haven’t fled risk aggressively.

Bitcoin Holds Above $95,000 Amid Institutional Inflows

Bitcoin has been trading in a narrow band around $95,000 in recent days. This consolidation is not a weakness; rather, it shows that institutional purchases are being absorbed over time. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $1.42 billion in net inflows over just a few days, helping prices remain above $95,000.

A technically strong close above $95,850 could signal that institutional demand is increasingly reflected in price. Conversely, weakness below $94,500 may indicate short-term profit-taking, potentially pushing BTC toward the $92,800 demand zone, a key area for market direction confirmation.

Ethereum Shows Temporary Weakness

Ethereum appears more fragile compared to Bitcoin. Resistance tests in the ETH/BTC pair have contributed to a temporary slowdown, with ETH potentially retracing toward $3,180.

Despite this, on-chain data and institutional inflows suggest the medium-term outlook remains positive. Recent single purchases of 20,000 ETH and ETF inflows in the hundreds of millions indicate that these retracements are more about repositioning than selling. As long as ETH stays above $3,060, the market tolerates these adjustments.

XRP Reacts to Regulatory Expectations

XRP continues to be among the few assets directly influenced by Clarity Act discussions. The potential for regulatory clarity to resolve XRP’s long-standing legal uncertainties quickly explains this sensitivity.

Holding above $2.05 shows that regulatory considerations remain in play. A potential approval could trigger both technical and perceptual price movements. Compared to Bitcoin and Ethereum, XRP faces a more delicate timing risk.

Are New Highs Possible Without Regulatory Clarity?

The market currently signals that fresh highs are possible even before the Clarity Act passes, but their sustainability is uncertain. The real turning point depends on whether institutional sentiment shifts after any approval.

For now, prices continue to price in expectations, and upward attempts may persist. However, as the process drags on, investor patience will likely be tested.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Clarity Act Delayed: Coinbase Surprise appeared first on Coin Engineer.

“A First in History: A President Overseeing His Own Company”

In a letter addressed to Comptroller Jonathan Gould, Warren summarized her concerns bluntly:

“We have never seen financial conflicts or corruption of this magnitude,” she said, making waves in Washington circles.

Warren pointed to past instances where Gould reportedly dodged questions about Trump’s influence: “I have no confidence you will fairly evaluate this application according to legal standards.”

Her core objection is the risk that Trump could advantage his own company through appointees he controls. Warren insists the review should be paused until Trump divests all ties to World Liberty. How the OCC responds, while operating under a president with discretionary authority, remains to be seen.

WLTC Holdings and the USD1 Stablecoin Plan

World Liberty’s subsidiary, WLTC Holdings, filed a critical application with the OCC earlier this month. The submission seeks a “national trust bank” charter, authorizing the issuance, custody, and conversion of its own stablecoin, USD1.

According to SEC filings and other publicly available information, the platform represents billions of dollars of paper wealth for the Trump family. Warren emphasized her distrust of Gould:

“You will oversee functions that impact the profitability of the president’s company. In fact, for the first time in U.S. history, a president will supervise his own financial enterprise.”

Legislative Battles: GENIUS Act in Play

The legal backdrop stems from Trump’s GENIUS Act, enacted last year to regulate stablecoins. The legislation designates the OCC as the primary regulator for stablecoin issuers. Warren argues the law fails to prevent these types of conflicts, urging the Senate to close gaps in upcoming crypto market legislation.

Meanwhile, the Senate Banking Committee is set to review a new crypto bill Thursday. Drafts leaked Monday revealed Democratic ethics provisions were omitted, suggesting tougher negotiations ahead.

Industry Reactions and Political Risks

Concerns extend beyond politics. Crypto leaders like Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson have voiced distrust of the current political direction. Markets are interpreting Trump’s pro-crypto stance as overshadowed by personal enrichment.

Warren noted that prior warnings were dismissed as speculative during the summer. Now, the feared scenario has materialized: the president simultaneously setting rules and being subject to them, posing a serious threat to the integrity of federal banking oversight.

Going forward, attention is on the Senate Banking Committee’s upcoming session and the OCC’s response under this political pressure.

The post Warren Demands Halt on Trump’s World Liberty Bank Bid appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Turkmenistan, Central Asia’s largest natural gas supplier, has relied on energy revenues for decades. The new law hints at a quiet but meaningful transition in the country’s economic approach.

Government-Controlled Crypto Era Begins

Signed by President Serdar Berdimuhamedov in November 2025, the legislation introduces a licensing framework covering exchanges, custodians, and mining operations. Only state-authorized entities can issue, handle, or trade digital assets. Oversight is directly assigned to the Cabinet of Ministers and the Ministry of Finance and Economy.

This framework emphasizes controlled growth over full market freedom. Licenses can be suspended or revoked if compliance rules are not met, aiming to curb illegal activity while securing the sector.

Step Away From Isolation

Turkmenistan has been one of the world’s most closed countries, controlling media, internet access, and foreign investment. Legalizing crypto marks the first time digital assets are formally recognized in the economy.

However, cryptocurrencies are not allowed as a payment method, and internet restrictions remain, creating uncertainty for large-scale mining and trading operations.

Energy Advantage and Investment Potential

With vast natural gas reserves, Turkmenistan could theoretically offer low-cost energy for crypto mining. Yet, strict government oversight may limit private-sector appeal. Government statements suggest the law aims to attract investment and advance digitalization, though details on initial licensing remain key for market direction.

Quiet Opening, Controlled Uncertainty

Alongside last year’s e-visa system for foreigners, the crypto law signals a gradual and selective opening from isolation. While mining and trading are legal, tight regulation, internet controls, and payment restrictions leave the sector’s full potential uncertain.

In the comment section, you can freely share your comments and  opinions about the topic. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter for the latest news and updates.

The post Crypto Mining Now Legal in This Country appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Why it matters?

This bill could mark the first serious attempt to treat stablecoins as payment tools rather than speculative assets. If adopted, it may accelerate real-world crypto usage while reshaping investor behavior across staking and DeFi lending markets.

Stablecoin Payments Get A $200 De Minimis Exemption

The draft proposes a $200 tax exemption for regulated stablecoin payments used to purchase goods and services. The exemption does not apply to investment gains and is framed strictly as an administrative simplification. Lawmakers are still evaluating whether an annual aggregate cap should apply to prevent repeated use from eroding tax collection.

The Treasury Department would receive authority to introduce anti-abuse rules. These may target coordinated transactions, related-party arrangements, and recordkeeping requirements. Additional guidance could also clarify cost basis allocation and gain characterization when the exemption does not apply.

Clear Tax Treatment For Digital Asset Lending

Another key section addresses digital asset lending. The bill extends nonrecognition treatment only to true lending of liquid and fungible digital assets. Lenders must retain the right to receive identical property back, ensuring the transaction does not function as a sale or disposal.

The framework explicitly excludes NFTs, illiquid tokens, thinly traded assets, tokenized securities, and synthetic or derivative-based instruments. Treasury guidance would aim to prevent disguised sales, basis shifting, and other tax avoidance structures within DeFi lending models.

Staking And Mining Rewards May Qualify For Tax Deferral

The proposal defines staking and mining as transaction validation activities on a cryptographically secured shared ledger. Taxpayers could elect to defer income recognition on rewards until the end of the fifth taxable year following receipt.

This approach reduces immediate tax pressure on long-term network participants. It also differentiates infrastructure contributors from short-term speculative actors, potentially influencing on-chain participation trends.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post US Crypto Tax Bill Unveiled: Stablecoins And Staking In Focus appeared first on Coin Engineer.

The decision reinforces regulatory uncertainty across crypto markets. Ongoing disputes over DeFi oversight and market supervision continue to block consensus. Investors are actively pricing in U.S.-driven regulatory risk as clarity slips further away.

Why it matters?
The CLARITY Act aims to define how crypto assets are regulated and which agencies hold authority. Delays keep institutional caution elevated and sustain uncertainty premiums across digital asset markets.

Why the CLARITY Act Will Not Pass in 2025

Senator John Kennedy, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, said the bill is not ready for a final vote. He noted progress in negotiations but emphasized that key disagreements remain unresolved. As a result, the Senate lacks the support needed to advance the legislation.

Lawmakers originally targeted a vote later this year. However, committee markups were postponed again. The earliest realistic window for action now points to January 2026, extending the regulatory timeline by at least another year.

Tim Scott Confirms the Revised Timeline

Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott confirmed that work on the CLARITY Act will restart in early 2026. He said the Senate and House versions carry different names but function as a single crypto market structure framework.

Scott accused Democrats of deliberately slowing the process. He argued that political resistance has effectively frozen progress. Despite this, he maintained optimism that the Senate could consider a vote early next year.

DeFi Disputes and Political Tensions Intensify

While bipartisan support exists for clearer crypto rules, DeFi regulation remains deeply divisive. In October, Senate Democrats introduced proposals requiring identity verification and strict anti-money-laundering compliance for DeFi platforms. The industry strongly opposed the move.

Republican lawmakers warned that such requirements could cripple DeFi activity in the United States. At the same time, some Democrats argue that advancing crypto legislation would legitimize business ventures linked to President Donald Trump.

These include a Trump-branded meme coin, the World Liberty Financial DeFi project, and American Bitcoin, a mining firm co-founded by Eric and Donald Trump Jr. Representative Maxine Waters previously said passing these bills would make Congress complicit in what she described as presidential crypto corruption.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post CLARITY Act Delayed in Senate, U.S. Crypto Law Pushed to 2026 appeared first on Coin Engineer.

The sell-off, led by BTC, confirmed expectations that the week would be highly volatile. Bitcoin fell to $85,150, marking its lowest level since the major leverage flush on December 2. Market stress indicators climbed to their highest levels since the 2022 bear market, revealing that pressure had been building beneath the surface for weeks.

At this point, the question dominating investor sentiment is clear: why did Bitcoin fall, and how deep did liquidations go? In this report, we examine the data and market forces that triggered the latest breakdown.

What Analysts Are Saying

Analysts point to different catalysts behind the sell-off, but there is broad agreement that the market remains fragile.

Analyst NoLimit attributed the decline to China, claiming that authorities tightened restrictions on domestic Bitcoin mining once again. According to NoLimit, the move forced local miners offline and added pressure to the network. The analyst also suggested that the Bank of Japan could add further downside pressure to Bitcoin this week.

Another analyst, Sykodelic, argued that derivatives markets were the real source of stress. He highlighted elevated open interest levels, noting that bearish positioning has become widely accepted. As traders increasingly chase downside moves with short positions, short-side liquidity continues to rebuild, reinforcing persistent selling pressure.

Deribit data supports this view. Roughly $2 billion in open interest is concentrated around the $85,000 strike price. As Bitcoin approaches this level, short sellers often hedge by selling spot or futures, amplifying downside momentum.

Glassnode analyst James Check emphasized that stress signals are flashing across the market. “Bitcoin market stress is now the highest we’ve seen since the 2022 bear market,” he noted.

On-Chain Data Signals Rising Stress

Market indicators further highlight the depth of the sell-off. According to James Check’s analysis:

• Unrealized losses have reached nearly $100 billion
• Hash rate has started to trend lower
• Around 60% of spot Bitcoin ETF inflows are now underwater
• Bitcoin-related treasury stocks are trading below their net asset values

Data shows that during the bitcoin drop, a large portion of spot ETF inflows slipped into loss territory, increasing pressure on institutional sentiment.

US Crypto Legislation Delay Proves Decisive

The most critical trigger behind the sell-off appears to be regulatory developments in the United States. A spokesperson for the US Senate Banking Committee confirmed that a crypto market structure bill will not advance this year.

“The Committee continues to negotiate and looks forward to a markup in early 2026,” the spokesperson said. The announcement effectively removed expectations for near-term regulatory clarity.

The proposed legislation would have granted the CFTC authority over spot crypto markets. The industry had widely expected progress before year-end, but pushing the timeline into 2026 has introduced fresh uncertainty, particularly for institutional investors.

Liquidation Data Reveals the Scale of the Move

Bitcoin’s drop to $85,150 triggered widespread liquidations. Over the past 24 hours, approximately $654.9 million in positions were wiped out.

• Long positions: $576.68 million
• Short positions: $78.22 million

The dominance of long liquidations shows that bullish traders absorbed most of the damage. The market went through a sharp deleveraging phase, clearing excessive leverage built up during previous rallies.

Taken together, regulatory uncertainty, extreme derivatives positioning, and rising on-chain stress converged at once. This combination erased $140 billion from the crypto market within hours. Current conditions suggest that bitcoin drop risks have not fully dissipated in the short term, leaving markets highly sensitive to upcoming macro and regulatory signals.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Bitcoin Drop: $140B Crypto Market Wiped Out as BTC Hits $85,150 appeared first on Coin Engineer.

The case emerges as crypto scams accelerate globally in 2025. Moreover, rising hack incidents and advanced social engineering tactics continue to pressure investor confidence across digital asset markets.

Why it matters?
This case highlights how unregulated crypto platforms can scale rapidly and cause systemic investor harm. It also signals tighter enforcement and rising compliance pressure across the global crypto market.

Enforcement Directorate Expands Crypto Fraud Investigation

India’s Enforcement Directorate initiated coordinated search operations on December 13 under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Authorities carried out raids at eight locations across Himachal Pradesh and Punjab. The probe focuses on what officials describe as a fake crypto-based Ponzi and multi-level marketing structure.

According to investigators, total investor losses reached nearly Rs. 2,300 crore. That amount equals approximately $254 million at current exchange rates. Officials identified Subhash Sharma as the primary architect of the scheme. Sharma reportedly left India in 2023, complicating recovery efforts.

Fake Crypto Platforms and Token Price Manipulation

The Enforcement Directorate stated that the fraud operated through multiple self-created platforms. These included Korvio, Voscrow, DGT, Hypenext, and A-Global. Each platform allegedly functioned without regulatory oversight and followed a classic Ponzi structure.

Organizers promised unusually high and consistent returns to attract investors. However, token prices were artificially manipulated rather than driven by market demand. Platforms were periodically shut down, rebranded, and relaunched to evade detection and prolong the scheme.

Key characteristics of the alleged crypto Ponzi network included:

• Guaranteed high-yield investment claims

• Artificial token pricing mechanisms

• Repeated platform shutdowns and rebranding

• Commission-based recruitment incentives

Money Laundering Channels and Legal Violations

Investigators revealed that proceeds from the scheme were laundered through cash collections, shell entities, and personal bank accounts. In addition, several individuals acted as commission agents, earning substantial payouts for onboarding new participants. Promotional events and foreign travel rewards further accelerated expansion.

Authorities froze bank balances, lockers, and fixed deposits totaling around Rs. 1.2 crore, or roughly $132,000. However, officials also uncovered serious legal violations. Despite prior freezing orders, 15 land plots in Zirakpur, Punjab were sold unlawfully. The transaction allegedly involved Vijay Juneja, who was later arrested.

Global Crypto Markets Face Rising Scam Pressure

This enforcement action underscores a broader trend affecting the global crypto market. Crypto scams are becoming more organized, multi-platform, and psychologically targeted. As a result, regulators worldwide are increasing scrutiny and tightening compliance standards.

Market analysts suggest that cases like this may shift investor behavior toward lower risk exposure. At the same time, regulatory clarity could accelerate as authorities attempt to restore trust in digital asset ecosystems.

Son Dakika kripto para haberleri için hemen tıkla.

The post $254M Crypto Ponzi Uncovered in India, Assets Frozen appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Kwon pleaded guilty to charges of fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Engelmayer noted that when UST lost its peg in May 2021, Kwon falsely claimed that an algorithm had restored its value, while secretly arranging for a trading firm to purchase millions of dollars in UST to artificially inflate its price. The judge also criticized Kwon’s mocking behavior on social media, citing a Twitter post where he belittled investors.

Court Proceedings and Kwon’s Flight Attempts

During the trial, Engelmayer reviewed Kwon’s attempts to evade the law. Kwon traveled on false passports to Serbia and Montenegro before being caught en route to Dubai. The court described this as “despicable,” especially since he publicly encouraged retail investors to hold UST while he and close associates exited their positions.

Following the sentencing, Jay Clayton, head of the Southern District of New York for the U.S. Department of Justice, stated: “Do Kwon devised complex schemes to mislead investors and inflate the value of Terraform’s cryptocurrencies for his own benefit. Once exposed, he conducted a deceptive PR campaign, laundered proceeds from illegal schemes, and attempted to seek political protection abroad. Fraud is fraud, and our office will relentlessly pursue justice for investors, regardless of where perpetrators flee.”

In August, Kwon admitted to conspiring to commit commodities fraud, securities fraud, and wire fraud connected to Terraform Labs’ operations. In court, he acknowledged that he knowingly participated in a plan to defraud UST buyers. Kwon also expressed remorse: “I want everyone to know I have spent all my time thinking about what I could have done differently and what I can do now. It has been four years since the incident, and I haven’t seen my family in three. I want to serve my restitution in my own country.”

Investors and Legal Implications

Judge Engelmayer deemed the defense’s requested five-year sentence “utterly unreasonable.” He said even the government’s suggested 12-year term would not sufficiently deter Kwon or future fraudsters.

Factors considered in the court’s decision included:

• Total funds lost and number of victims

• Kwon’s attempts to evade the law

• Misleading and mocking conduct on social media

• Deceiving investors while protecting personal positions

The Terraform collapse is now recorded as one of the largest scandals in crypto history, and Kwon’s sentence sets a significant precedent for the digital asset industry.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Do Kwon Sentenced to 15 Years for $40B Crypto Scandal appeared first on Coin Engineer.