On a daily basis, spot gold declined by 0.14%, while spot silver posted a 1.01% gain. Despite silver’s positive close, intraday price action across both metals suggests that markets are entering a consolidation phase following a strong rally in recent weeks.

Trade Policies and Global Tensions Drove the Recent Rally

The sharp rise in gold and silver prices over the past period was largely fueled by uncertainty surrounding global trade policies and escalating geopolitical tensions. In particular, expectations that the United States would implement new tariffs boosted demand for safe-haven assets, pushing precious metals toward all-time highs.

As these risks intensified, investors increasingly sought protection in gold and silver. However, the subsequent easing of those concerns has begun to reverse that trend.

Gold outlook:

Silver outlook:

Trump’s Tariff Decision Shifts Market Expectations

Market sentiment changed notably after U.S. President Donald Trump signaled that the planned tariffs would not be implemented. Following a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump stated that the framework for a potential agreement involving Greenland had become clearer.

As part of this development, tariffs scheduled to take effect on February 1 were suspended in connection with the Greenland negotiations. The removal of this immediate trade risk reduced short-term demand for safe-haven assets, putting downward pressure on precious metal prices.

Greenland Talks Gain Momentum at the Highest Level

According to Trump’s remarks, negotiations related to Greenland will be led by senior U.S. officials. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are expected to take charge of the talks.

The involvement of top-level policymakers underscores that the issue extends beyond trade, carrying broader strategic and geopolitical implications.

U.S. Eyes Role in Greenland’s Mineral Resources

Trump also indicated that the United States could play a role in Greenland’s mineral rights under a potential agreement. This statement points to a longer-term strategic interest in the region’s natural resource potential.

Estimates suggest that Greenland’s natural resource reserves may be worth approximately $5 trillion, highlighting why the territory has become increasingly significant in global energy and raw materials discussions.

Precious Metals Enter a Short-Term Consolidation Phase

With tariff-related risks diminishing and geopolitical tensions temporarily easing, the upward momentum in gold and silver has weakened. Still, analysts caution that global economic and political uncertainties have not disappeared entirely.

As a result, while precious metals may experience volatility and consolidation in the near term, it may be premature to conclude that safe-haven demand has fully faded. Markets will continue to monitor geopolitical developments and global trade signals closely, as any renewed uncertainty could quickly restore interest in gold and silver.

Please don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram  ,YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news.

The post Gold and Silver Pull Back as Geopolitical Tensions Ease appeared first on Coin Engineer.

According to Bloomberg-sourced reporting, the Senate Banking Committee’s decision to shift its focus toward Trump’s housing affordability initiative has likely pushed consideration of the crypto market structure bill into late February or March.

Trump’s Davos Crypto Message: Urgency from the White House

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, President Trump expressed optimism that crypto market structure legislation could be signed into law “very soon.” He emphasized that Congress is actively working on the issue and briefly departed from his prepared remarks to underscore his point, adding, “Bitcoin — all of them.”

The timing of the statement was notable. It came only days after the Senate Banking Committee abruptly canceled a scheduled markup session for the bill. Viewed in context, Trump’s remarks appeared to be a direct attempt to apply public pressure on lawmakers to accelerate the process.

A Split Legislative Path for Crypto: Two Committees, One Framework

The proposed crypto market structure framework is advancing through two separate Senate committees, each responsible for different regulatory domains:

• The Senate Banking Committee, which oversees securities regulation and broader financial policy

• The Senate Agriculture Committee, which handles commodity markets and CFTC jurisdiction

For the legislation to reach the Senate floor, both committees must pass their respective bills and reconcile them into a single, unified framework.

Progress, however, has been uneven. The Banking Committee postponed its planned markup after Coinbase withdrew its support for the bill. In the following week, the committee redirected its attention toward housing policy, delaying crypto-related discussions further. As a result, the earliest realistic window for revisiting the bill now appears to be late February or March.

In contrast, the Agriculture Committee has continued moving forward. Chairman John Boozman released the text of the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act and confirmed that a markup session is scheduled for January 27. Still, Boozman acknowledged that bipartisan negotiations with Senator Cory Booker failed to produce an agreement.

The Central Dispute: Stablecoin Yield

At the heart of the legislative impasse lies a dispute over stablecoin yield.

Under the GENIUS Act, signed by President Trump last year, stablecoin holders are permitted to earn rewards or yield — effectively interest-like returns. In some cases, these yields can surpass those offered by traditional bank deposits.

This has triggered strong opposition from banking industry lobbyists, who are pushing lawmakers to restrict or eliminate stablecoin yield provisions in the new market structure bill.

Coinbase has drawn a firm line on this issue. CEO Brian Armstrong announced that the company withdrew its support for the legislation precisely because of these proposed restrictions, stating that “no bill is better than a bad bill.”

In comments delivered during the Davos forum, Armstrong accused banking associations of attempting to suppress competition, arguing that such efforts run counter to fundamental American principles.

White House Pushback Against Industry Resistance

Coinbase’s stance prompted a sharp response from the Trump administration. Patrick Witt, executive director of the president’s digital assets council, publicly criticized Armstrong’s position.

Witt emphasized that the current pro-crypto regulatory environment exists largely because of Trump’s electoral victory and policy direction. He warned that resistance from within the crypto industry itself could undermine a rare opportunity to establish a favorable regulatory framework, potentially resulting in serious long-term consequences.

Lawmakers Warn of a Narrow Window

Frustration is growing among legislators as the bill stalls. Senator Cynthia Lummis, a long-time crypto advocate who is set to retire next year, openly expressed disappointment with the pace of progress and noted that time is running out to finalize meaningful legislation.

Industry leaders share similar concerns. Blockchain Association CEO Peter Smith cautioned that failure to pass the bill now could push the issue beyond the upcoming midterm elections, effectively delaying comprehensive regulation by at least two more years.

Representative William Timmons highlighted the economic stakes, arguing that a clear and competitive regulatory framework could bring tens of billions of dollars back into the U.S. crypto sector. Without it, he warned, crypto innovation and capital may continue migrating overseas.

Markets Move Faster Than Lawmakers

While Congress debates, financial markets are already adapting. The New York Stock Exchange recently announced plans to launch a blockchain-based platform for tokenized securities, offering instant settlement and around-the-clock trading.

Senator Thom Tillis pointed to developments like these as evidence that crypto is no longer a peripheral issue. In his view, maintaining the United States’ leadership in global finance now requires getting crypto regulation right, as digital assets are becoming an integral component of modern banking systems.

What Happens Next?

The current landscape reveals clearly defined positions:

• The Trump administration is pushing for rapid passage

• Coinbase considers restrictions on stablecoin yield a non-negotiable red line

• Banking lobbyists remain committed to keeping those restrictions in place

Although the Agriculture Committee appears set to advance its bill, a complete market structure framework cannot materialize without action from the Banking Committee. Ultimately, the unresolved conflict over stablecoin yield will determine whether the legislation moves forward — or stalls indefinitely.

What is increasingly clear is that time is becoming a critical factor. Each delay raises the risk that the United States could lose its competitive edge in shaping the future of global crypto markets.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Why Is Crypto Legislation Stuck in U.S. Congress? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Crypto Regulation Enters the Global Arena

With U.S. President Donald Trump and several European leaders attending the forum, Davos provides a high-profile platform to discuss the future of global finance. Among the topics expected to draw attention is the proposed U.S. crypto market structure legislation, a bill that has sparked intense debate within both the crypto industry and traditional financial circles. Rather than remaining a domestic issue, the legislation is now being examined through a broader international lens.

Armstrong’s Focus: Bridging Crypto and Banking

Brian Armstrong’s presence in Davos comes with a clear objective. After Coinbase recently withdrew its support for the proposed crypto law, Armstrong is now working to address the core disagreements behind that decision. His plan includes meetings with senior banking executives to explore whether the legislation can be reshaped into a framework that benefits both crypto-native firms and established financial institutions.

One of the most contentious issues remains stablecoins. Armstrong has repeatedly argued that stablecoins should not be viewed as a threat to banks, but rather as tools that could unlock new efficiencies and revenue opportunities within the traditional financial system. At the same time, uncertainty around whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer yield, along with potential restrictions on decentralized finance, continues to fuel friction between regulators and the industry.

Engaging Policymakers Beyond Davos

Beyond private meetings, Armstrong has indicated that feedback from Davos will be shared directly with U.S. lawmakers. The goal is to ensure that any final version of the legislation reflects practical realities rather than imposing rigid constraints that could stifle innovation. In addition, Armstrong is expected to hold discussions with government leaders about the broader role of crypto assets in the global economy.

Why Coinbase Pulled Its Support

Coinbase’s decision to step back from the bill followed delays in Senate committee votes, driven by disagreements between the Banking and Agriculture committees. The exchange cited concerns over limitations on stablecoin interest and constraints placed on DeFi as reasons for withdrawing its backing. Armstrong summed up the stance by suggesting that passing a flawed law would be worse than passing none at all.

As conversations unfold in Davos, the outcome of these high-level engagements may prove decisive in shaping the future direction of U.S. crypto regulation.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Coinbase CEO Takes Action for Crypto Act! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Amid the memecoin frenzy surrounding the Official Trump (TRUMP) token, industry leaders presented an optimistic outlook for the establishment of a Bitcoin strategic reserve during the forum’s sole cryptocurrency-themed session.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong reaffirmed that the idea of creating a Bitcoin reserve remains alive and well, adding:

“Senator Cynthia Lummis is actively pushing for this. The US government holds reserves in assets like gold and oil. However, Bitcoin should now be seen as the new gold standard.”

Central Banks Criticize Bitcoin as a Reserve Asset

The session included one non-crypto panelist, South African Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago, who dismissed the idea of holding Bitcoin as a reserve. Kganyago emphasized South Africa’s focus on CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies) and blockchain utility over Bitcoin’s value.

He stated:

“Why Bitcoin? If we consider it as a reserve, why not platinum, coal, or even strategic reserves of beef or apples?”

You Might Be Interested In: Elon Musk Shared, That Memecoin Flew: Up 500%!

In response, Armstrong highlighted Bitcoin’s superiority over gold:

“Bitcoin is provably scarce like gold but far more portable and divisible. It was the best-performing asset of the past decade. Central banks could start by holding 1% of their reserves in Bitcoin, but over time, this could surpass gold reserves.”

The Trump Effect and New Optimism for US Crypto

SkyBridge Capital founder Anthony Scaramucci noted that Trump’s presidency brought renewed optimism to the crypto industry. Reflecting on Trump’s speech at a Bitcoin conference, Scaramucci stated:

“It was clear that if Trump won, the crypto industry would see significant changes. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party failed to adopt a clear position, which contributed to their losses in the presidency, the House, and the Senate.”

Stellar Foundation director Denelle Dixon acknowledged the challenges posed by US regulations, which have driven the crypto industry to look abroad:

“Despite the regulatory environment, the demand for the US dollar made it impossible to ignore the American market.”

Armstrong concluded by emphasizing the impact of Trump’s presidency:

“The ‘Trump effect’ cannot be denied. His administration has brought fresh optimism and opportunities for the crypto industry to thrive in the United States.”

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post US Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Divides Opinions! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

On January 22, Wednesday, two major token unlocks are scheduled. SPACE ID (ID) will unlock 18.49 million tokens, equating to 0.92% of the total supply and valued at around $7 million. Similarly, Enalith (ENA) will unlock 12.86 million tokens, equivalent to 0.08% of the total supply, worth approximately $11 million.

You Might Be Interested In: Elon Musk Shared, That Memecoin Flew: Up 500%!

On January 23, Thursday, the Central Bank of Turkey will announce its interest rate decision at 4:30 PM. The expected rate is 45%, down from the previous 47.5%. Additionally, it is the final decision day for the Grayscale SOL ETF application. At the same time, U.S. Jobless Claims data will be released, with an expected figure of 220K, compared to the previous 217K.

Finally, on January 24, Friday, the Arbitrum (ARB) BOLD voting will conclude. The same day marks the final decision deadline for the Solana ETF applications by VanEck, 21Shares, Canary, and Bitwise.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Important Crypto and Economic Events This Week! appeared first on Coin Engineer.