Over shorter horizons, Bitcoin has also beaten Tesla’s returns. Just a year ago, the value of Bitcoin grew to 139%, while the value of Tesla stocks decreased by more than 11%. On the other hand, since the beginning of the year, Tesla’s share price has been down by 42%, while Bitcoin is up by 49%.

Thanks to its phenomenal success, Bitcoin market capitalization has reached $1.3 trillion, becoming the 9th largest asset in the world. In contrast, Tesla is the world’s 21st-largest asset by market value, with a value of $455 billion.

Tesla buying more than $1.5 billion worth of BTC in February 2021, Tesla joined the ranks of the first publicly traded companies that had done so. However, the company did sell some 10% of its Bitcoin holdings in March 2021 and some 75% in the second quarter of 2022.

By not selling its bitcoin, Tesla would have ended up with more than $1.27 billion, a return of over 84% over its original investment. Tesla now has 11,509 BTC, worth more than $766 million with Coinbase Prime Custody.

Bitcoin ETFs

One of the major drivers of the 60% Bitcoin rally this year has been 10 US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) being available for trading.

Comprising an aggregate value of almost $55.1 billion, these Bitcoin ETFs, which have reposed on-chain holdings of over 835,000 BTC.

The post What Were the Implications of Tesla’s Decision to Invest in Bitcoin? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

According to Coutts, the use of renewable energy sources in Bitcoin mining has exceeded 50% for the first time, thanks to miners shifting to regions with less intensive fossil fuel usage and adopting more sustainable solutions such as off-grid power and gas flaring. This positive trend has led to a reduction in carbon emissions associated with Bitcoin mining, despite the increasing hash rate that measures miners’ computational power.

Coutts substantiates these claims by referencing data from Cambridge University, Coin Metrics, and climate technology expert Daniel Batten. He points out that following a more accurate assessment of ASIC machines used in the mining process, Cambridge University recently revised its estimate of Bitcoin’s 2022 electricity consumption from 105.3 terawatt-hours (TWh) to 95.5 TWh.

You might also like: Coin Engineer – Ledgity AMA Summary

Furthermore, Batten highlights shortcomings in the Cambridge model, which excluded new sustainable energy sources and significant geographical shifts over the past three years. The analyst predicts a 37.5% reduction in emissions from Bitcoin mining since the temporary drop in hash rate caused by China’s mining ban in mid-2021, even as the hash rate has rebounded and increased fourfold.

Coutts argues that the declining emissions and rising hash rate demonstrate a growing reliance on renewable energy sources within Bitcoin mining. He also suggests that Bitcoin mining could further support the transition away from coal for wind and solar energy, reducing associated costs: “What becomes even more apparent is that the transition away from coal for wind and solar often requires incentives and early suboptimal returns in the lifecycle of energy plants. Bitcoin mining, as a source of income from excess energy, can facilitate this transition.”

Elon Musk previously stated that Tesla would consider accepting BTC payments again 50% of the energy used in BTC mining comes from renewable sources. Musk’s statement was made in July 2021, when he mentioned:

“It looks like Bitcoin is shifting more towards renewable energy, especially with the closure of many heavy coal plants in China. I want to do a little more diligence to confirm that the percentage of renewable energy usage is most likely at or above 50% and that there is a trend towards increasing that number. If so, Tesla will most likely resume accepting Bitcoin.”

The post What Will Elon Musk Do About Bitcoin? appeared first on Coin Engineer.