<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Fat Finger Error Archives - Coin Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/fat-finger-error/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/fat-finger-error/</link>
	<description>Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 06:52:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Accidental $90K Gas Fee Sparks Speculation</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/accidental-90k-gas-fee-sparks-speculation/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/accidental-90k-gas-fee-sparks-speculation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanju Akbıyık]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethereum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fat Finger Error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Fee]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=26449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>An unnamed cryptocurrency user made headlines after inadvertently spending $90,000 in gas expenses for a simple Ethereum transfer—a transaction that should have only cost about $5. Etherscan records the user paid simply 0.87 ETH, valued at $2,262, 34.26 Ether—worth $89,200 at current rates. Pseudo user DeFiac on X pointed up the outrageous transaction overspending. Ethereum</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/accidental-90k-gas-fee-sparks-speculation/">Accidental $90K Gas Fee Sparks Speculation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An unnamed cryptocurrency user made headlines after inadvertently spending <strong>$90,000</strong> in gas expenses for a simple <strong>Ethereum</strong> transfer—a transaction that should have only cost about $5. Etherscan records the user paid simply 0.87 ETH, valued at $2,262, 34.26 Ether—worth $89,200 at current rates.</p>
<p>Pseudo user DeFiac on X pointed up the outrageous transaction overspending. Ethereum network gas costs run two to four gwei, hence the user overpaid by more than 1,783,900%. These &#8220;<em>fat finger&#8221;</em> errors, in which users unintentionally input incorrect transaction data, are not infrequent in the cryptocurrency sphere.</p>
<h3>Possible Money Laundering or Simple Mistake?</h3>
<p>While many believe the payout was a mistake, others speculate it may have been a methodical attempt at money laundering. Such a mechanism cannot operate without the awareness of which <strong>Ethereum</strong> validator would handle the transaction and assure it was included in the appropriate block. Close cooperation between the user and the validator will help to ensure the money was not being squandered.</p>
<p>An October 2023 study by crypto staking business <strong>Northstake</strong> revealed illicit and high-risk behavior on Ethereum staking systems and the mainnet ranged between 0.46% and 1.56%. Although these figures are somewhat low, they raise issues for regulated businesses looking at Ethereum-based distributed banking and staking strategies.</p>
<p>Whether the transaction is planned or not, the story reminds us of the complexities and risks existing in the crypto market, where a little mistake may lead to significant financial loss.</p>
<p><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our </span></i><a href="https://t.me/coinengineernews"><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Telegram, </span></i></a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer"><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">YouTube</span></i></a><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">, and </span></i><a href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers"><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Twitter</span></i></a><i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> channels for the latest </span></i><a href="https://coinengineer.io/news/"><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">news</span></i></a><i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> and updates.</span></i></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/accidental-90k-gas-fee-sparks-speculation/">Accidental $90K Gas Fee Sparks Speculation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/accidental-90k-gas-fee-sparks-speculation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ethereum-gas-fee.webp' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ethereum-gas-fee.webp' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
