<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>financial policy Archives - Coin Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/financial-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/financial-policy/</link>
	<description>Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 08:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>EU Watchdog Proposes 100% Capital Requirement for Crypto Holdings</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/eu-watchdog-proposes-100-capital-requirement-for-crypto-holdings/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/eu-watchdog-proposes-100-capital-requirement-for-crypto-holdings/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yigit Taha OZTURK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 09:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitcoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[btc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethereum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volatility]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=39226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The European Union’s insurance authority has introduced a proposal requiring insurance firms to hold capital equal to the value of their crypto holdings. This move aims to mitigate risks associated with high volatility in the digital asset market. The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) presented the proposal in a Technical Advice report to</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/eu-watchdog-proposes-100-capital-requirement-for-crypto-holdings/">EU Watchdog Proposes 100% Capital Requirement for Crypto Holdings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-pm-slice="1 1 []">The European Union’s insurance authority has introduced a proposal requiring insurance firms to hold capital equal to the value of their <strong>crypto</strong> holdings. This move aims to mitigate risks associated with high volatility in the digital asset market.</p>
<p>The <strong>European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA)</strong> presented the proposal in a Technical Advice report to the <strong>European Commission</strong> on <strong>March 27</strong>. Unlike traditional asset classes such as stocks and real estate, which have lower capital requirements, <strong>crypto</strong> assets would need to be fully backed.</p>
<p><em>“EIOPA considers a 100% haircut in the standard formula prudent and appropriate for these assets in view of their inherent risks and high volatility,” </em>the authority stated.</p>
<h2>Why the 100% Requirement?</h2>
<p>The <strong>100% capital charge</strong> is based on the assumption that <strong>crypto</strong> prices could drop completely. EIOPA noted that <strong>Bitcoin (BTC)</strong> and <strong>Ether (ETH)</strong> have previously seen declines of <strong>82% and 91%</strong>, respectively. This is significantly higher than the capital requirements for stocks (<strong>39%-49%</strong>) and real estate (<strong>25%</strong>), according to <strong>Commission Delegated Regulation 2015/35</strong>.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong><em>You Might Be Interested In: <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/elon-musk-talks-about-the-name-of-a-new-memecoin/">Elon Musk Talks About the Name of a New Memecoin!</a></em></strong></p>
<hr />
<p>EIOPA offered four options for the <strong>European Commission</strong>:</p>
<ol>
<li>Make no changes.</li>
<li>Implement an <strong>80% stress level</strong> for <strong>crypto</strong> holdings.</li>
<li>Implement a <strong>100% stress level</strong> (EIOPA’s recommendation).</li>
<li>Broaden the approach to include risks of <strong>tokenized assets</strong>.</li>
</ol>
<p><em>“An 80% stress to the value of <strong>crypto</strong>-asset exposures does not appear sufficiently prudent,”</em> EIOPA stated, emphasizing the need for <strong>100% backing</strong>.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-152171 size-full" src="https://coinmuhendisi.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ab-1.webp" alt="ab" width="727" height="366" /></p>
<h2>Impact on Insurance Markets</h2>
<p>The proposed regulation would mostly affect insurers in <strong>Luxembourg</strong> and <strong>Sweden</strong>, which account for <strong>69%</strong> and <strong>21%</strong> of all <strong>crypto</strong>-related insurance undertakings. Other impacted nations include <strong>Ireland (3.4%)</strong>, <strong>Denmark (1.4%)</strong>, and <strong>Liechtenstein (1.2%)</strong>.</p>
<p>Most of these holdings are structured within funds, such as <strong>exchange-traded funds (ETFs)</strong>, and held on behalf of <strong>unit-linked policyholders</strong>.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-152170 size-full" src="https://coinmuhendisi.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ab.webp" alt="ab" width="885" height="496" /></p>
<h2>Future of Crypto in Insurance</h2>
<p>Despite proposing a <strong>100% capital requirement</strong>, EIOPA acknowledged that broader adoption of <strong>crypto</strong> assets may require a more <strong>differentiated approach</strong> in the future. As the sector evolves, further regulatory adjustments could be introduced.</p>
<hr />
<p><em>You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <a href="https://t.me/coinengineernews" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>Telegram, </strong></a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>YouTube</strong></a>, and <a href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>Twitter</strong></a> channels for the latest <a title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7">news</a> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/eu-watchdog-proposes-100-capital-requirement-for-crypto-holdings/">EU Watchdog Proposes 100% Capital Requirement for Crypto Holdings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/eu-watchdog-proposes-100-capital-requirement-for-crypto-holdings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/europe.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/europe.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
