<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Mining Pools Archives - Coin Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/mining-pools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/mining-pools/</link>
	<description>Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 10:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>$3.5B Bitcoin Heist from 2020 Retroactively Uncovered!</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/3-5b-bitcoin-heist-from-2020-retroactively-uncovered/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/3-5b-bitcoin-heist-from-2020-retroactively-uncovered/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yigit Taha OZTURK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 12:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkham Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitcoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitcoin heist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockchain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[btc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptocurrency theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberattacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethereum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LuBian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mining Pools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=47274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A massive heist that remained unreported for years has finally come to light, marking the largest cryptocurrency hack in history. According to Arkham Intelligence, Chinese mining pool LuBian was hacked in 2020, with 127,426 Bitcoin valued at approximately $3.5 billion stolen, making it the biggest crypto hack of all time. LuBian Mining Pool Hacked in</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/3-5b-bitcoin-heist-from-2020-retroactively-uncovered/">$3.5B Bitcoin Heist from 2020 Retroactively Uncovered!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-start="2716" data-end="3041">A massive heist that remained unreported for years has finally come to light, marking the largest cryptocurrency hack in history. According to <strong>Arkham Intelligence</strong>, Chinese mining pool <strong>LuBian</strong> was hacked in 2020, with 127,426 <strong>Bitcoin</strong> valued at approximately $3.5 billion stolen, making it the biggest crypto hack of all time.</p>
<h2 data-start="3043" data-end="3089">LuBian Mining Pool Hacked in December 2020</h2>
<p data-start="3091" data-end="3468">Arkham Intelligence uncovered the hack on Saturday, revealing that the LuBian mining pool, which was the sixth-largest <strong>BTC</strong> mining pool at the time, was attacked on December 28, 2020. About 90% of its <strong>Bitcoin</strong> was stolen by hackers before the pool managed to transfer its remaining 11,886 BTC to recovery wallets. Neither <strong>LuBian</strong> nor the hackers reported the attack at the time.</p>
<p data-start="3091" data-end="3468"><em>You Might Be Interested In: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/sonic-svm-research-can-new-stablecoins-shake-up-the-old-order/">Sonic SVM Research: Can New Stablecoins Shake Up the Old Order?</a></span></em></p>
<p data-start="3470" data-end="3737">The hackers embedded OP_RETURN messages in 1,516 transactions to store wallet addresses. <strong>Arkham</strong> also noted that LuBian used a private key generation algorithm that was susceptible to brute-force attacks, which may have been the vulnerability exploited by the hackers.</p>
<p data-start="3470" data-end="3737"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-164220" src="https://coinmuhendisi.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/devasa-bitcoin-soygunu.jpeg" alt="Bitcoin, arkham intelligence" width="632" height="466" /></p>
<h2 data-start="3739" data-end="3784">The Aftermath and Crypto Security Warning</h2>
<p data-start="3786" data-end="4195">At the time of the hack, the stolen Bitcoin was worth $3.5 billion, but now, at current prices, it’s valued at around $14.5 billion. <strong>Arkham</strong> highlights this incident as a critical reminder for crypto users to implement robust private key management and security practices. The breach also serves as a warning for all cryptocurrency investors about the risks of weak algorithms and poor cybersecurity practices.</p>
<h2 data-start="4197" data-end="4240">A Turning Point in Crypto Theft History</h2>
<p data-start="4242" data-end="4658">The <strong>LuBian</strong> hack surpasses the $1.5 billion <strong>ByBit</strong> hack from earlier this year, which was previously considered the largest crypto theft in history. This event, along with several other notable hacks, highlights the ever-present threats in the crypto space. In April, an elderly individual lost $330 million in Bitcoin via a social engineering attack, which was later laundered through 300 different wallet addresses.</p>
<p data-start="4242" data-end="4658"><em>You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="https://t.me/coinengineernews">Telegram</a><span style="color: #000000;">,</span> <a style="color: #0000ff;" href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">YouTube</a></span><span style="color: #000000;">,</span> and <a href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Twitter</span></a> channels for the latest<span style="color: #0000ff;"> <a style="color: #0000ff;" title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7">news</a></span> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/3-5b-bitcoin-heist-from-2020-retroactively-uncovered/">$3.5B Bitcoin Heist from 2020 Retroactively Uncovered!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/3-5b-bitcoin-heist-from-2020-retroactively-uncovered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/taslak-ce-93.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/taslak-ce-93.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solo Bitcoin Miner Scores $373,000 Block Reward</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solo-bitcoin-miner-scores-373000-block-reward/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solo-bitcoin-miner-scores-373000-block-reward/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yigit Taha OZTURK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2025 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitcoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitcoin mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Block Reward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crypto mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hashrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mining Pools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network difficulty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solo Mining]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=46880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>While Bitcoin mining is largely dominated by major corporations, there are still rare occasions when solo miners achieve success. In a remarkable feat, a solo Bitcoin miner recently mined a block and collected a reward of 3.125 BTC, valued at $373,000. A Rare Victory for Solo Miners A solo miner successfully mined block 907283, which</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/solo-bitcoin-miner-scores-373000-block-reward/">Solo Bitcoin Miner Scores $373,000 Block Reward</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-start="3057" data-end="3317">While <strong data-start="3063" data-end="3081">Bitcoin mining</strong> is largely dominated by major corporations, there are still rare occasions when solo miners achieve success. In a remarkable feat, a solo <strong data-start="3220" data-end="3231">Bitcoin</strong> miner recently mined a block and collected a reward of 3.125 BTC, valued at $373,000.</p>
<h2 data-start="3319" data-end="3358">A Rare Victory for Solo Miners</h2>
<p data-start="3360" data-end="3702">A solo miner successfully mined block 907283, which contained 4,038 transactions and total transaction fees of $3,436. The miner, operating via the <strong data-start="3508" data-end="3519">Solo CK</strong> pool, managed to solve the puzzle and claim the reward. Despite rising network difficulty and hashrate, solo miners continue to occasionally add blocks to the <strong data-start="3679" data-end="3690">Bitcoin</strong> blockchain.</p>
<p data-start="3360" data-end="3702"><em>You Might Be Interested In: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a style="color: #0000ff;" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/sonic-svm-research-can-new-stablecoins-shake-up-the-old-order/">Sonic SVM Research: Can New Stablecoins Shake Up the Old Order?</a></span></em></p>
<p data-start="3704" data-end="3929">Earlier this year, in February 2025, another solo miner successfully mined a block and earned a reward of $350,000. Additionally, in July, a miner using only 2.3 petahashes managed to mine a block and secure a similar reward.</p>
<p data-start="3704" data-end="3929"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-163607" src="https://coinmuhendisi.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/bitcoin-solo-madenci.webp" alt="" width="595" height="607" /></p>
<h2 data-start="3931" data-end="4014">Increasing Network Difficulty and Hashrate Pressure on Professional Miners</h2>
<p data-start="4016" data-end="4357">The current Bitcoin network difficulty stands at about 126 trillion, close to all-time highs. This makes mining even harder for solo miners but also presents challenges for large-scale commercial mining companies. The rising hashrate and difficulty levels require miners to use greater computational power, driving up energy consumption.</p>
<p data-start="4359" data-end="4551">To cope with these challenges, many major mining companies are diversifying into <strong data-start="4440" data-end="4446">AI</strong> data centers and high-performance computing to offset the declining profitability of traditional mining.</p>
<h2 data-start="4553" data-end="4605">Challenges of a Competitive Mining Industry</h2>
<p data-start="4607" data-end="4931">The competitive landscape of <strong data-start="4636" data-end="4654">Bitcoin mining</strong> is forcing companies to seek cheaper energy resources to remain profitable. The ongoing rise in network difficulty, along with reduced block rewards, means miners must expend more resources to solve a single block and claim a reward of 3.125 BTC, worth approximately $373,000.</p>
<p data-start="4933" data-end="5171">Additionally, weather events and climate conditions have affected mining operations. For instance, in June, several miners in Texas had to limit their energy usage to avoid paying peak demand charges, reducing short-term block production.</p>
<p data-start="4933" data-end="5171"><em>You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="https://t.me/coinengineernews">Telegram</a><span style="color: #000000;">,</span> <a style="color: #0000ff;" href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">YouTube</a></span><span style="color: #000000;">,</span> and <a href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><span style="color: #0000ff;">Twitter</span></a> channels for the latest<span style="color: #0000ff;"> <a style="color: #0000ff;" title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7">news</a></span> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/solo-bitcoin-miner-scores-373000-block-reward/">Solo Bitcoin Miner Scores $373,000 Block Reward</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solo-bitcoin-miner-scores-373000-block-reward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/taslak-ce-2025-05-22T004543.891.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/taslak-ce-2025-05-22T004543.891.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
