<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>network security Archives - Coin Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/network-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/network-security/</link>
	<description>Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:16:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Solana Quickly Fixed Security Vulnerability: Tokens Now More Secure</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solana-fixes-vulnerability/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solana-fixes-vulnerability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeliz Akmaca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 14:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockchain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptocurrency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solana foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[token-2022]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero-day]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=41619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Solana identified a significant security vulnerability in its blockchain system. The &#8220;zero-day&#8221; flaw, an unknown software issue discovered on April 16, was located in the ZK ElGamal Proof program. Malicious persons could have exploited this flaw to fraudulently generate hidden digital currencies under the Token-2022 standard or unauthorizedly withdraw funds from user accounts. The Solana</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/solana-fixes-vulnerability/">Solana Quickly Fixed Security Vulnerability: Tokens Now More Secure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span data-c>Solana identified a significant security vulnerability in its blockchain system. The &#8220;<strong>zero-day&#8221;</strong> flaw, an unknown software issue discovered on April 16, was located in the <strong>ZK ElGamal Proof program</strong>. Malicious persons could have exploited this flaw to fraudulently generate hidden digital currencies under the <strong>Token-2022</strong> standard or unauthorizedly withdraw funds from user accounts. The <strong>Solana Foundation</strong> promptly detected the issue and resolved it within two days. This swift response safeguarded the system. The incident underscored the critical importance of security in blockchain technology. But at the time of writing, <strong>SOL is $143.69</strong>.</span></p>
<h2><span data-c>System Updated, Security Enhanced</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></h2>
<p><span data-c>However, the discreet coordination of the update with validators sparked centralization debates among some community members. Notably, a <strong>Curve Finance</strong> contributor questioned the Solana Foundation’s close relationship with validators, suggesting it could pose risks like transaction censorship or chain rollback. <strong>Solana Labs CEO Anatoly Yakovenko</strong> countered that the <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/why-is-the-crypto-market-falling-today/"><strong>Ethereum</strong></a> community would likely act similarly in such a scenario, emphasizing that such coordination is common in the industry. Additionally, Solana’s reliance on a single client (Agave) drew criticism. However, the upcoming Firedancer client is expected to enhance network resilience.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><strong>Hudson James, Vice President at Polygon Labs, an Ethereum layer-2 network developer, stated: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p><span data-c>&#8220;This is completely normal. Bitcoin, Zcash, and Ethereum have all had instances where core developers had to privately plan a fix for a covert bug. A good chain culture means having mature developers capable of implementing discreet fixes.&#8221;</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p></blockquote>
<p><span data-c><strong>Solana</strong> continues to be a leading <strong>blockchain</strong> with its performance. However, it needs to build more trust in transparency and network stability. In the short term, it may test the <a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/token-2022"><strong>$200</strong></a> resistance level, but its long-term success depends on ecosystem growth and technical improvements.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><em><strong>***Not Investment Advice </strong></em></p>
<p><em>You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <a href="https://t.me/coinengineernews" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow"><strong>Telegram, </strong></a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow"><strong>YouTube</strong></a>, and <a href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>Twitter</strong></a> channels for the latest <a title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7">news</a> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/solana-fixes-vulnerability/">Solana Quickly Fixed Security Vulnerability: Tokens Now More Secure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solana-fixes-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/taslak-ce-46.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/taslak-ce-46.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solana’s Inflation Cut Proposal Fails to Pass!</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solanas-inflation-cut-proposal-fails-to-pass/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solanas-inflation-cut-proposal-fails-to-pass/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yigit Taha OZTURK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeFi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memecoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multicoin Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIMD-228]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solana Compass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solana governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solana Price Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tushar Jain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Validators]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=38423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SIMD-228, which proposed dynamically adjusting Solana’s inflation rate, failed to gain enough support. However, this is seen as a victory for the network’s governance process. Solana’s Inflation Adjustment Proposal Rejected Multicoin Capital co-founder Tushar Jain stated that despite the proposal failing, this was an important step for the Solana ecosystem and its governance process. The</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/solanas-inflation-cut-proposal-fails-to-pass/">Solana’s Inflation Cut Proposal Fails to Pass!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-start="54" data-end="239"><strong data-start="54" data-end="66">SIMD-228</strong>, which proposed dynamically adjusting <strong data-start="105" data-end="115">Solana</strong>’s inflation rate, failed to gain enough support. However, this is seen as a victory for the network’s governance process.</p>
<h2 data-start="241" data-end="297">Solana’s Inflation Adjustment Proposal Rejected</h2>
<p data-start="299" data-end="475"><strong data-start="299" data-end="320">Multicoin Capital</strong> co-founder <strong data-start="332" data-end="347">Tushar Jain</strong> stated that despite the proposal failing, this was an important step for the <strong data-start="425" data-end="445">Solana ecosystem</strong> and its governance process.</p>
<p data-start="477" data-end="746">The vote saw participation from <strong data-start="509" data-end="527">910 validators</strong>, representing <strong data-start="542" data-end="570">74% of the staked supply</strong>. However, only <strong data-start="586" data-end="610">43.6% voted in favor</strong>, while <strong data-start="618" data-end="641">27.4% voted against</strong> and <strong data-start="646" data-end="664">3.3% abstained</strong>. The proposal required <strong data-start="688" data-end="698">66.67%</strong> approval to pass but received only <strong data-start="734" data-end="743">61.4%</strong>.</p>
<p data-start="748" data-end="879"><strong data-start="748" data-end="767">Solana’s X team</strong> emphasized that the voter turnout was <strong data-start="806" data-end="876">higher than every U.S. presidential election in the last 100 years</strong>.</p>
<p data-start="748" data-end="879"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-151051 size-full" src="https://coinmuhendisi.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/solana.jpeg" alt="Solana" width="613" height="510" /></p>
<h2 data-start="881" data-end="919">What Was the Proposal’s Goal?</h2>
<p data-start="921" data-end="1161"><strong data-start="921" data-end="933">SIMD-228</strong> aimed to transition <strong data-start="954" data-end="964">Solana</strong>’s inflation system from a <strong data-start="991" data-end="1009">fixed schedule</strong> to a <strong data-start="1015" data-end="1046">dynamic, market-based model</strong>. The new system would adjust inflation rates based on staking participation to prevent excessive token issuance.</p>
<hr />
<p data-start="1163" data-end="1461"><strong><em>You Might Be Interested In: <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/elon-musk-talks-about-the-name-of-a-new-memecoin/">Elon Musk Talks About the Name of a New Memecoin!</a></em></strong></p>
<hr />
<p data-start="1163" data-end="1461">Currently, <strong data-start="1174" data-end="1184">Solana</strong>&#8216;s annual inflation rate starts at <strong data-start="1219" data-end="1225">8%</strong>, decreasing by <strong data-start="1241" data-end="1248">15%</strong> per year until it reaches <strong data-start="1275" data-end="1283">1.5%</strong>. However, the new model could have reduced inflation by <strong data-start="1340" data-end="1353">up to 80%</strong>. As of now, <strong data-start="1366" data-end="1376">Solana</strong>’s inflation rate stands at <strong data-start="1404" data-end="1413">4.66%</strong>, with only <strong data-start="1425" data-end="1458">3% of the total supply staked</strong>.</p>
<p data-start="1463" data-end="1735">High inflation can <strong data-start="1482" data-end="1511">increase selling pressure</strong>, lower <strong data-start="1519" data-end="1534">SOL’s price</strong>, and discourage network activity. The proposed system aimed to stabilize the network by adjusting inflation rates based on staking participation while encouraging <strong data-start="1698" data-end="1732">more active use of SOL in DeFi</strong>.</p>
<p data-start="1463" data-end="1735"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-151052 size-full" src="https://coinmuhendisi.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/solana-2.jpeg" alt="Solana" width="862" height="500" /></p>
<h2 data-start="2035" data-end="2076">How Did This Affect SOL’s Price?</h2>
<p data-start="2078" data-end="2481">The rejection of the proposal did not trigger significant volatility in <strong data-start="2150" data-end="2157">SOL</strong>’s price. <strong data-start="2167" data-end="2174">SOL</strong> dropped <strong data-start="2183" data-end="2191">1.5%</strong> on the day, falling just below <strong data-start="2223" data-end="2231">$125</strong>. However, following the <strong data-start="2256" data-end="2281">memecoin bubble burst</strong>, <strong data-start="2283" data-end="2290">SOL</strong> has lost nearly <strong data-start="2307" data-end="2314">60%</strong> of its value over the past two months. Additionally, <strong data-start="2368" data-end="2396">Solana’s network revenue</strong> has declined by <strong data-start="2413" data-end="2425">over 90%</strong> due to reduced memecoin minting and trading activity.</p>
<hr />
<p data-start="2078" data-end="2481"><em>You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <a href="https://t.me/coinengineernews" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>Telegram, </strong></a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>YouTube</strong></a>, and <a href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>Twitter</strong></a> channels for the latest <a title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7">news</a> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/solanas-inflation-cut-proposal-fails-to-pass/">Solana’s Inflation Cut Proposal Fails to Pass!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solanas-inflation-cut-proposal-fails-to-pass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Solana-Co-Founder-Sued.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Solana-Co-Founder-Sued.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
