In particular, the stalled progress of major legislation such as the CLARITY Act has contributed to hesitation among institutional investors. Despite these short-term challenges, Edelman remains strongly optimistic about Bitcoin’s future and believes the asset could experience a substantial rally over the coming years.

Regulatory Uncertainty Continues to Weigh on Bitcoin

Volatility in the crypto market has made many investors more cautious in recent months. While macroeconomic factors play an important role, Edelman believes regulatory ambiguity is also a major contributor to the market’s current hesitation.

The CLARITY Act, which aims to establish a clearer regulatory framework for digital assets in the United States, has faced delays during the legislative process. According to Edelman, this lack of regulatory clarity is slowing the pace of institutional adoption.

He argues that once a well-defined regulatory structure is implemented, large financial institutions may feel more comfortable allocating capital to the crypto sector. Such a shift could significantly strengthen demand for Bitcoin.

Long-Term Forecast: $500,000 by 2030

Although short-term uncertainty remains, Edelman maintains a highly bullish outlook on Bitcoin’s long-term potential. He believes that continued growth in the digital asset ecosystem, combined with increasing institutional participation and clearer regulation, could drive a dramatic expansion in Bitcoin’s value.

Based on these factors, Edelman suggests that Bitcoin could potentially reach $500,000 by the end of the decade, highlighting the scale of the opportunity he sees in the asset class.

This projection reflects expectations that Bitcoin will continue strengthening its role within the global financial system while attracting a broader base of investors.

Dismissing the “Quantum Computers Will Destroy Bitcoin” Narrative

Edelman also addressed a topic that has recently gained attention in technology and crypto circles: the claim that quantum computers could eventually break Bitcoin’s cryptographic security.

He dismissed these concerns in strong terms, arguing that such claims often overlook how technological development works in practice. In his view, advancements in computing power are typically matched by improvements in cybersecurity and cryptographic defenses.

To illustrate his point, Edelman used a simple analogy:

“If someone shows up with a 10-meter ladder to climb the blockchain wall, developers will simply build a 12-meter wall.”

This comparison reflects his belief that security systems within blockchain networks will continue evolving alongside emerging technologies.

Strategic Targets Would Likely Come First

Edelman further emphasized that even if quantum computing were capable of breaking cryptographic systems in the future, Bitcoin would probably not be the primary target.

A sophisticated attacker with such capabilities would more likely focus on far more critical infrastructure, including:

• National power grids

• Sensitive government systems

• Strategic infrastructure networks

• Nuclear command systems

Given the importance of these targets, Edelman argues that concerns about Bitcoin being the first victim of quantum attacks are largely exaggerated.

A Strong Long-Term Outlook for Digital Assets

Despite periodic market corrections and regulatory delays, Edelman believes the broader trajectory of the crypto industry remains intact. Digital assets are gradually becoming a more integrated part of the global financial ecosystem.

Clearer regulations, increasing institutional participation, and continuous technological improvements are all factors that could support long-term growth.

For Edelman, the current period of uncertainty does not change the broader narrative. Instead, he sees it as a transitional phase before wider adoption takes hold — a process that could ultimately drive significant price appreciation for Bitcoin in the years ahead.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post What Could Happen to Bitcoin If the CLARITY Act Passes? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Although the report spans only six pages, it includes a direct reference to cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. This mention has been interpreted by many observers as an important indication that digital asset infrastructure is becoming part of broader national cybersecurity discussions.

Trump Cited Crypto and Blockchain as Secure Technologies

Within the strategy document, cryptocurrencies and blockchain systems are referenced as technologies whose security should be supported. The report highlights the need to develop secure technological frameworks and supply chains that protect user privacy from the earliest stages of design through full deployment.

Industry observers consider this reference notable because it places blockchain-based systems within the context of national security priorities. For many analysts, it signals that U.S. cybersecurity policy may increasingly recognize the importance of protecting digital financial infrastructure alongside other emerging technologies.

Strong Focus on Combating Illicit Financial Networks

Another section of the strategy emphasizes the need to dismantle criminal infrastructure and eliminate financial safe havens used by illicit networks. While the report does not specifically mention individual crypto tools or platforms, these statements have prompted discussion within the digital asset sector.

Some analysts believe the language could support stricter oversight of technologies that have been linked to financial anonymity. Services such as crypto mixing platforms, privacy-focused digital currencies, and unregulated financial off-ramps could potentially face greater scrutiny if authorities interpret the strategy in that direction.

As a result, the policy framework appears to balance technological support with stronger enforcement against illegal financial activity.

Quantum Computing Risks Enter the Discussion

The strategy also highlights concerns related to quantum computing, a topic that has been debated within the cryptocurrency community for years. Advances in quantum technology could eventually challenge current cryptographic systems, including those used in blockchain networks.

The growing attention to quantum capabilities suggests that governments are beginning to take potential long-term cybersecurity implications more seriously. Within the crypto sector, some investors have argued that large institutional holders may eventually demand faster progress in addressing these theoretical security risks.

Artificial Intelligence and the Future Cyber Workforce

Beyond digital assets, the strategy places strong emphasis on artificial intelligence as a key component of future cybersecurity infrastructure. Securing the AI technology stack, including data centers and computational systems, is presented as a major national priority.

The document also stresses the importance of developing the next generation of cybersecurity professionals. Expanding the cyber workforce is viewed as essential for designing and deploying advanced technological solutions capable of protecting national digital infrastructure.

Traditionally, U.S. administrations release a national cybersecurity framework during each presidential term to outline priorities related to emerging technologies. Trump’s strategy therefore provides insight into how the United States may approach cybersecurity challenges in an era increasingly defined by blockchain, artificial intelligence, and rapidly evolving digital threats.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Trump Announces National Cybersecurity Strategy appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Scaling Further: Gas Limit Beyond 100 Million

One of the most closely watched technical metrics within the Ethereum ecosystem has been the gas limit — the maximum computational workload allowed per block. Throughout 2025, the topic remained central to community discussions as the network pursued higher throughput without compromising decentralization.

Following the Pectra and Fusaka upgrades, the community doubled the gas limit from 30 million to 60 million, marking the first major increase since 2021. For 2026, the foundation aims to push the limit gradually beyond 100 million. Some Ethereum educators have suggested that projections of 180 million in 2026 may represent a baseline rather than an optimistic ceiling, highlighting growing confidence in the network’s scaling trajectory.

Preparing for the Post-Quantum Era

Beyond throughput improvements, Ethereum is taking a forward-looking stance on security. “Post-quantum readiness” has been identified as a strategic priority, reflecting concerns that future quantum computers could threaten existing cryptographic standards.

A key milestone will be the Glamsterdam network upgrade, expected in the first half of 2026. Earlier this year, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced the formation of a dedicated Post-Quantum (PQ) team within the foundation. The initiative represents a long-term effort to ensure the network remains secure in a future where quantum capabilities become commercially viable.

Smarter Wallets and Seamless Interoperability

User experience is also central to the 2026 agenda. Native account abstraction is expected to enhance smart wallet functionality, making Ethereum interactions more intuitive and flexible. At the infrastructure level, faster Layer 1 confirmations and shorter Layer 2 settlement times are being prioritized to enable smoother, trust-minimized cross-L2 interactions.

The broader goal is to create a more seamless multi-chain environment while preserving Ethereum’s security guarantees.

Ethereum and Artificial Intelligence

These developments follow recent comments from Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin regarding the intersection of blockchain and artificial intelligence. Buterin has emphasized that AI should enhance human agency, improve financial safety, and support healthier markets rather than replace human decision-making. While near-term applications may remain practical and incremental, his long-term vision positions Ethereum as part of a broader technological evolution.

Overall, the 2026 roadmap reflects a balanced strategy: scaling the network’s capacity, upgrading its security architecture, and refining the user layer — all while preparing Ethereum for a more complex digital future.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Ethereum 2026 Roadmap: Quantum and Gas Limit appeared first on Coin Engineer.

What BIP 360 Proposes

BIP 360 introduces a new output type known as Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR). The proposal modifies how spending conditions are structured by disabling Taproot’s key-path spending mechanism, which was introduced in 2021. Under the current design, spending via the key path reveals the public key. In a world with sufficiently advanced, fault-tolerant quantum computers, that exposure could theoretically allow attackers to derive the corresponding private key.

Cryptographic researcher and BIP 360 co-author Ethan Heilman has emphasized that this specific feature creates a potential vulnerability in a quantum scenario. By removing the key-path spending option while maintaining Taproot’s upgrade flexibility, P2MR aims to eliminate the most quantum-sensitive component without sacrificing future extensibility. However, implementing such a change would require broad consensus and a future soft fork activation process.

How Close Is the Quantum Threat?

The urgency of the threat remains contested. Shor’s algorithm demonstrates that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically derive private keys from exposed public keys. Thomas Rosenbaum, president of Caltech, has suggested that functional, fault-tolerant quantum systems could emerge within five to seven years. Supporting this view, Caltech researchers have reportedly maintained coherence across more than 6,000 qubits with 99.98% accuracy, and IBM recently demonstrated a 120-qubit entangled system.

Despite these advances, Heilman cautions that long-term forecasting in quantum development is highly uncertain and considers a near-term cryptographic breakthrough unlikely. Similarly, Jameson Lopp, co-founder and chief security officer of Casa, argues that quantum hardware capable of threatening modern cryptography remains orders of magnitude away.

Technical Challenge or Governance Hurdle?

The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology has outlined post-quantum migration targets extending into the mid-2030s. For Bitcoin, however, technical readiness is only part of the equation. Activating a proposal typically requires roughly 95% sustained support among miners, node operators, businesses, and users. As decentralized protocols mature, achieving such consensus can become increasingly difficult.

While some industry participants view quantum risk as speculative, others believe that addressing existential threats proactively is essential to preserving Bitcoin’s long-term value. The timeline may be uncertain, but the groundwork for adaptation is already underway.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Bitcoin Developers Move Toward a Post-Quantum Future appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Today, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other blockchain networks rely on classic public-key cryptography systems such as RSA, ECDSA, and DSA. While these methods are considered secure against traditional computers, they carry serious vulnerabilities against quantum computers. This is where qONE (QONE) and the underlying qLABS ecosystem come into play.

The Quantum Threat and the Concept of “Q-Day”

When quantum computers reach sufficient maturity, quantum algorithms such as Shor’s algorithm will make it possible to factor large prime numbers and solve discrete logarithm problems. This development has the potential to render all currently used public-key cryptography systems inoperable.

In such a scenario, private keys could be derived from publicly visible wallet addresses, digital signatures could be forged, and on-chain assets could be seized. This critical threshold is referred to in the literature as Q-Day (Quantum Day).

While it is not yet clear exactly when Q-Day will occur, the risk is no longer purely theoretical. Private keys and signatures created today can be broken retroactively in the future.

What is qLABS? What Does It Aim to Achieve?

qLABS positions itself as the world’s first quantum-native crypto foundation. Its core objective is to prepare the Web3 ecosystem for Q-Day and provide infrastructure capable of protecting approximately $20 billion worth of circulating crypto assets against quantum threats.

To this end, qLABS is developing an integrated product ecosystem built on:

• Quantum-resistant cryptography
• Zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) technologies
• Blockchain-compatible smart contract architectures

At the center of this ecosystem is qONE (QONE).

What is qONE (QONE)?

qONE (QONE) is the first quantum-resistant token issued on the Hyperliquid ecosystem. It also serves as the native token of the qONE Security Protocol and forms the economic backbone of all security layers within the ecosystem.

qONE is not merely a crypto asset; it is designed as:

• A hedge against Q-Day
• The payment unit for Quantum-Sig wallets and secure transactions
• A core element of protocol governance and staking mechanisms

Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) and NIST Standards

NIST’s Role The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been the institution defining global cryptography standards such as DES, AES, and SHA since the 1970s. With the quantum threat becoming clear, NIST launched the Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Project in 2016.

At the end of this multi-year process, draft standards for quantum-resistant digital signature algorithms were published as of 2024. This development shows that PQC has become an official and implementable security standard rather than an academic concept.

NIST-Selected PQC Algorithms

• CRYSTALS-Dilithium: Lattice-based digital signature system. It stands out as the primary standard due to its balance of speed, security, and practicality.
• SPHINCS+: Hash-based, stateless design that is theoretically extremely conservative.
• FALCON: Another lattice-based algorithm offering smaller signatures and fast verification. Adoption is slower due to implementation complexity.

The qONE Security Protocol aims to make these standards blockchain-compatible.

Why Has the Crypto Ecosystem Fallen Behind?

Major technology companies such as Apple, Google, and Microsoft have already begun PQC integrations. In contrast, the main reasons the crypto sector lags behind are:

• Consensus rigidity: Cryptography is foundational to chains, making changes difficult.
• Backward incompatibility: Transitioning to PQC may invalidate existing addresses and keys.
• Technical cost: PQC signatures are 10–100 times larger than classical signatures.
• Resource constraints: Blockchain projects lack the coordination of large technology companies.

qLABS is one of the rare projects aiming to close this gap.

qLABS Product Ecosystem

Security Protocol

The core security layer of the ecosystem. It combines post-quantum cryptography with zero-knowledge proofs to enable quantum-resistant verification of on-chain transactions.

• Dual-signature verification with standard key + quantum-resistant key
• User-toggleable Quantum Factor Authentication (QFA)
• Simple pass/fail verification output for applications

All these processes run in the background without disrupting user experience.

Quantum-Sig Wallet

Quantum-Sig wallet adapts the classic multisig logic to the needs of the quantum era.

• Even if a classic private key is compromised,
• Funds cannot be withdrawn without the quantum-resistant key
• ZKP engine enables verification of large signature data on existing chains

Result: Quantum security at the smart contract level, chain-independent.

Q-Sig Wallet Integration Hub

For developers and institutional clients:

• SDK
• White-label solutions
• Plug-in integrations

enabling the spread of Quantum-Sig technology on both B2B and B2C sides.

qONE (QONE) Tokenomics

Total supply: 1 billion QONE Network: HyperEVM

• Early Supporters: 6.46%
• Community Round: 1.70%
• Public Sale: 4.69%
• Team and Advisors: 11.92%
• Hyperliquidity and Bridge: 7.95%
• Liquidity / Treasury: 38.73%
• Community Airdrops: 28.56%

qONE Token Use Cases

• Payment of fees for quantum-secure transactions
• Access to Quantum-Sig wallets (QFA)
• Protocol staking
• Governance voting
• Token buybacks funded by fiat revenue

Every secure transaction creates demand for QONE.

qONE Roadmap

Q1 2026 – Launch

• QONE Token
• Security Protocol
• Quantum-Sig Wallet
• Integration Hub

2026 – Scale

• Multisig Wallet
• L1 Migration Toolkit
• Institutional integrations

2027 and Beyond – Expand

• Cross-chain bridges
• DeFi integrations
• Global adoption

qONE Team

Developed by a team with over 30 years of combined experience in post-quantum cryptography.

• Antanas Guoga (Tony G) – President Strategy, partnerships, and external relations.
• Andrew Cheung – CTO CEO of 01 Quantum, leader of PQC and ZKP architecture.
• Ada Jonuse – Executive Director Operations and ecosystem growth.
• Gintautas Nekrosius – CMO Go-to-market strategies and scaling.

Official Links

• Website
• X (Twitter)
• Whitepaper

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post What is qONE (QONE)? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

How Much Bitcoin Is Actually Exposed?

Estimates circulating in the market often claim that 20% to 50% of Bitcoin’s total supply could eventually be compromised by quantum-enabled attacks. CoinShares challenges this view, stating that such figures conflate hypothetical exposure with coins that could feasibly be targeted and stolen at scale.

The analysis focuses on legacy Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK) addresses, an older format in which public keys are permanently visible on-chain. Because these keys are openly accessible, they are theoretically more vulnerable if quantum computers become capable of reversing cryptographic signatures. CoinShares estimates that roughly 1.6 million BTC, or about 8% of total supply, resides in these address types.

Distribution Matters More Than Headlines

The most critical insight from the report lies not in the total number of potentially exposed coins, but in how they are distributed. CoinShares estimates that only around 10,200 BTC is concentrated in amounts large enough to cause meaningful market disruption if compromised.

The remaining coins are spread across more than 32,000 individual UTXOs, each holding an average of approximately 50 BTC. This fragmented structure significantly reduces the appeal of a quantum attack. Instead of breaching a single large wallet, an attacker would need to crack thousands of separate outputs individually, making the process slower, more expensive, and far more detectable.

Technological Reality and Timeline

From a technical standpoint, CoinShares argues that breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography would require fault-tolerant quantum systems around 100,000 times more powerful than today’s most advanced machines. Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet has noted that while current systems operate at the scale of hundreds of qubits, such attacks would require millions of qubits. This places the realistic threat horizon at a decade or more away.

A Manageable Engineering Challenge

Rather than framing quantum computing as an emergency, CoinShares characterizes it as a foreseeable engineering problem. The firm supports a gradual migration toward post-quantum signature schemes, allowing the Bitcoin ecosystem to adapt over time.

While debate continues between developers and institutional investors regarding preparedness, current evidence suggests that quantum computing does not pose an immediate or systemic risk to Bitcoin. The issue appears less like an impending crisis and more like a long-term transition that can be addressed methodically.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post CoinShares: The Quantum Threat to Bitcoin Is Being Overstated appeared first on Coin Engineer.

As part of this initiative, the Foundation has established a dedicated team focused exclusively on post-quantum research and implementation.

Ethereum Foundation Forms New Post-Quantum Focused Team

The newly formed Post-Quantum team is led by Thomas Coratger, a cryptographic engineer at the Ethereum Foundation. The group will concentrate on developing cryptographic systems designed to withstand potential attacks from advanced quantum computers.

According to Ethereum researcher Justin Drake, this move represents a strategic turning point. While post-quantum research has been underway behind the scenes for years, the Foundation is now accelerating timelines and shifting into active execution. This reflects a broader understanding that quantum-resistant infrastructure must be developed well before quantum threats become practical.

At the technical core of this strategy lies leanVM, a highly specialized and minimal zero-knowledge virtual machine. LeanVM is expected to serve as a foundational component for Ethereum’s post-quantum architecture, particularly in areas related to cryptographic verification and efficiency.

Developer Sessions and Targeted Funding

Ethereum’s post-quantum push extends beyond research into hands-on ecosystem development. Starting next month, biweekly developer sessions will focus specifically on post-quantum transaction design. These sessions will be led by Ethereum researcher Antonio Sanso and will emphasize user-facing security solutions.

Key discussion areas include protocol-level cryptographic tools, account abstraction pathways, and longer-term plans for aggregating transaction signatures through leanVM. The goal is to ensure that post-quantum protections are not only theoretically sound but also practical and accessible.

To support this effort, the Ethereum Foundation has committed $2 million in new funding. This includes a $1 million Poseidon Prize, aimed at strengthening the Poseidon hash function, and a separate $1 million Proximity Prize, designed to encourage innovation in post-quantum cryptography.

Growing Industry Awareness

Interest in quantum risk is expanding across the broader crypto industry. Recently, Coinbase announced the formation of an independent advisory board to assess how advances in quantum computing could affect blockchain security. The board, composed of experts from academia and industry, is expected to publish its first findings in early 2027.

Meanwhile, the Ethereum Foundation plans to host a dedicated post-quantum event later this year, followed by a focused session ahead of EthCC. Educational initiatives targeting developers and enterprises are also underway, underscoring Ethereum’s intent to lead the ecosystem into a quantum-secure future.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Ethereum Prepares for the Quantum Age! Here Are Updates appeared first on Coin Engineer.

While some market participants view quantum risk as a growing overhang, several prominent voices within the Bitcoin ecosystem argue that the explanation is overly simplistic and distracts from more immediate market dynamics.

Glassnode: Long-Term Holder Selling Is the Real Driver

Glassnode lead analyst James Check has pushed back against the narrative that quantum computing fears are responsible for Bitcoin’s recent weakness. According to Check, attributing price movements to abstract technological threats ignores observable on-chain behavior.

Check points to sustained sell-side pressure from long-term Bitcoin holders as the dominant factor behind price stagnation. He notes that throughout 2025, HODLers distributed Bitcoin at levels that would have prematurely ended prior bull markets multiple times over.

From this perspective, quantum computing may be influencing sentiment at the margins, but it is not the primary force shaping near-term price action.

Why Quantum Computing Has Reentered the Spotlight

Quantum computing differs fundamentally from classical computing by using qubits, which can process information in parallel states. In theory, sufficiently advanced quantum machines could compromise certain cryptographic algorithms, a concern that has been debated within blockchain research circles for years.

What has changed recently is the growing attention from traditional finance. Several high-profile executives and strategists have begun openly questioning whether advances in quantum computing could pose a long-term security risk to Bitcoin.

One notable example is Jefferies strategist Christopher Wood, who recently removed Bitcoin from his “Greed & Fear” model portfolio. His decision was partially driven by concerns that accelerating progress in quantum technology could undermine Bitcoin’s long-term investment case.

A Divided Bitcoin Community

There is no consensus within the Bitcoin community on how seriously the quantum narrative should be taken today.

Bitcoin author Vijay Boyapati has expressed strong skepticism, arguing that current price behavior cannot be credibly explained by quantum computing concerns. In his view, the narrative has gained traction in select investment commentary but lacks grounding in market fundamentals.

In contrast, Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter takes a far more assertive stance. Carter has argued that Bitcoin’s unexpected underperformance is largely attributable to quantum risk, calling it the defining issue for the market this year. He has warned that developers may be underestimating the urgency of the problem.

“Risk Expands With Time, Not Price”

Adding a structural layer to the debate, Real Vision’s chief crypto researcher Jamie Coutts emphasizes that quantum risk does not correlate directly with short-term price movements.

According to Coutts, rising prices tend to increase confidence across the ecosystem, reducing the perceived need for disruptive precautionary upgrades. Ironically, this creates a situation where the system feels safest precisely when incentives to prepare for long-term threats are weakest.

From this viewpoint, the danger lies less in immediate market impact and more in delayed adaptation.

Bitcoin’s Performance Fell Short of Expectations

Against this backdrop, Bitcoin’s 2025 performance failed to meet the most optimistic forecasts. The year began with Bitcoin trading near $93,400, but it closed approximately 6.3% lower around $87,500.

While some projections had envisioned prices reaching $250,000, Bitcoin peaked slightly above $126,000 in October before losing momentum. In recent sessions, the asset has traded largely sideways, hovering near the $89,500 level.

Click here to get the latest news from Coin Engineer!

The post Is Quantum Computing Behind Bitcoin Sideways Price Action? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Rather than focusing on immediate technical attacks, this scenario centers on how markets respond to perceived technological vulnerability.

Why Quantum Computing Is Seen as a Real Risk

Quantum computers are theoretically capable of breaking the cryptographic standards currently securing blockchain networks. If such capabilities were realized, private keys could be compromised, wallets could be accessed without authorization, and on-chain assets would face unprecedented risks.

Although quantum machines with this level of power are not yet operational at scale, investment in the technology is accelerating rapidly. Edwards emphasizes that the primary danger lies in market perception. Even without an actual breach, growing concern that Bitcoin is unprepared for quantum threats could undermine confidence and trigger aggressive selling pressure.

A Narrow Window for Action

Edwards believes the timeline is critical. In his view, Bitcoin should adopt quantum-resistant solutions no later than 2026. If the transition is delayed and uncertainty persists into 2028, markets may conclude that the network has fallen behind irreversibly.

Under such conditions, Edwards describes a potential downturn as the most severe bear market in Bitcoin’s history—one that could eclipse previous crises in both scale and duration. This assessment stands in contrast to more optimistic views within the industry.

Divided Opinions Across the Crypto Sector

Not all experts share this level of concern. Some argue that practical quantum threats remain decades away, giving blockchain networks ample time to adapt. Others point out that major financial institutions are already experimenting with post-quantum cryptography, suggesting a gradual and manageable transition.

Within the Bitcoin community itself, opinions remain split. Analyst Willy Woo has suggested that SegWit-based wallets may offer relatively safer long-term storage as an interim measure. Meanwhile, MicroStrategy chairman Michael Saylor has dismissed quantum fears as largely overstated and driven by narrative rather than near-term reality.

Technology, Timing, and Market Psychology

The quantum debate highlights that Bitcoin’s risks are not purely economic. Technological readiness, upgrade timing, and investor perception all play a crucial role in price dynamics. Even if a technical solution eventually emerges, delays or uncertainty could prove costly. The coming years may represent a defining period in determining whether Bitcoin can stay ahead of the next technological curve.

Also, in the comment section, you can freely share your comments and opinions about the topic. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on Telegram, YouTube and Twitter for the latest news and updates.

The post If This Happens with Bitcoin We Could See It Fall Below 50K! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

A Potential Pre-2028 Risk: “Elliptic Curves Will Die”

Vitalik Buterin noted that some researchers believe quantum computers could achieve the capability to derive private keys from public keys by as early as 2028—a scenario that would undermine the security of digital wallets on a fundamental level. His remark that “elliptic curves will die” reflects the seriousness of the potential threat.

However, he also made it clear that this outcome is not guaranteed. Forecasts on Metaculus, for example, assign a roughly 20% probability to such a breakthrough occurring before 2030, with the median estimate pointing to 2040. Still, Buterin emphasized that even a modest risk warrants preparation, especially for a system responsible for securing billions of dollars in digital assets.

For Ethereum, he believes adopting hash-based, quantum-safe algorithms is the most prudent path forward.

Future Innovation Should Shift to Layer-2, Wallets, and Privacy

Vitalik Buterin also stressed that the core Ethereum protocol should no longer be the primary focal point for major upgrades. Instead, he argued that the next phase of progress should occur at the Layer-2 level, as well as in wallet infrastructure and privacy-focused technologies. According to him, this approach will give the ecosystem the flexibility and resilience it needs.

Why Quantum Computing Matters

Quantum computers operate differently from traditional machines, which rely on bits that represent 0 or 1. Quantum systems use qubits—units that can exist in multiple states at once—allowing them to process vast amounts of information simultaneously. This gives them the potential to solve certain cryptographic problems exponentially faster.

Major technology companies such as IBM, Google, and Microsoft are investing heavily in scalable quantum hardware. Some new quantum chips have already demonstrated the ability to perform computations that would take classical supercomputers trillions of years.

Buterin’s message is clear: the quantum threat may not be imminent, but the possibility alone is enough to justify urgent preparation. Transitioning Ethereum to quantum-resistant cryptography could become one of the most defining developments of the next few years.

Is Quantum Computing Really a Threat to Bitcoin? Willy Woo Weighs In

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Vitalik Buterin: “Quantum Computers Could Break Cryptography by 2028” appeared first on Coin Engineer.