<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>SEC crypto regulation Archives - Coin Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/sec-crypto-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/sec-crypto-regulation/</link>
	<description>Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 06:56:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Crypto ETF Update: Two More Delayed!</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/crypto-etf-update-two-more-delayed/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/crypto-etf-update-two-more-delayed/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeliz Akmaca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 06:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bitwise staking ETF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto etf trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto passive income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOGE ETF update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethereum ETF news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethereum staking risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PoS investment funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public crypto comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulated staking products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC crypto regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC ETF review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solana ETF launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staking ETF future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staking-enabled ETF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=45278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In an official notice published on June 30, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it is postponing its decision on Bitwise’s proposal to enable staking within its Ethereum ETF. The commission also initiated a public comment period to gather opinions on the matter.  Bitwise argues that staking could enhance investor returns. The</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/crypto-etf-update-two-more-delayed/">Crypto ETF Update: Two More Delayed!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span data-c>In an official notice published on June 30, 2025, the U.S.<strong> Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)</strong> announced it is postponing its decision on Bitwise’s proposal to enable staking within its Ethereum ETF. The commission also initiated a public comment period to gather opinions on the matter.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>Bitwise argues that staking could enhance investor returns. The company clarified that it has not altered the <strong>ETF</strong> structure, emphasizing that the proposal only aims to increase the potential for passive income. However, the SEC raised concerns that staking might elevate potential risks for investors and could lead to conflicts of interest.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>Previously, <strong>Ethereum ETFs</strong> were approved solely for holding <strong>spot ETH</strong>. Bitwise now seeks to incorporate staking within the ETF to earn additional rewards by locking up ETH in the Ethereum network. This system, known as staking, involves earning new coin rewards in return for securing the blockchain.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>To better understand the impact of this proposal on investors, the SEC is requesting public commentary, with particular focus on the risks associated with staking. Key concerns include investor control over staked assets, potential for fraud, and lack of transparency.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>Notably, the SEC’s decision will not only affect <strong>Bitwise’s</strong> application but could also set a precedent for other Ethereum ETF providers. If approved, staking support could usher in a new era for crypto ETFs.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<h2><span data-c>DOGE ETF Decision Also Delayed: SEC Postpones Review of 21Shares Application</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></h2>
<p><span data-c>The SEC’s focus is not limited to Ethereum ETFs. The application from 21Shares for a<strong> Dogecoin (DOGE)-based ETF</strong> also failed to progress to the next stage of evaluation. The commission extended the review period by an additional <strong>60 days</strong> for a more detailed assessment.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>21Shares submitted its DOGE ETF application earlier this year, triggering major discussions about the role of highly volatile assets like DOGE in regulated investment products. The SEC has yet to provide a clear stance on how such speculative assets should be treated in ETF form.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>However, this delay does not necessarily mean rejection. The commission is examining whether the application aligns with investor protection, market fairness, and transparency principles.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<h2><span data-c>A New Era for Crypto ETFs May Be Approaching</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></h2>
<p><span data-c>Staking-related proposals are reframing crypto investment products not just as value-holding tools but also as yield-generating instruments. Bitwise claims adding staking features to its <strong>Ethereum ETF</strong> could appeal to both retail and institutional investors.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>Ultimately, the SEC’s decisions on these proposals will influence not just Bitwise but all fund managers in the space. If staking is approved, it may lead to the development of similar staking-enabled ETF models for<strong> Ethereum and other proof-of-stake (PoS) cryptocurrencies</strong>.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>Meanwhile, another development in the crypto space: <strong>RexShares-Osprey CEO Gregory King</strong> announced that the company would launch a Solana staking ETF on July 2. This move signals growing momentum behind staking-enabled ETFs.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span><em>You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <a href="https://t.me/coinengineernews">Telegram</a>, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow">YouTube</a>, and <a href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Twitter</a> channels for the latest <a title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7">news</a> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/crypto-etf-update-two-more-delayed/">Crypto ETF Update: Two More Delayed!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/crypto-etf-update-two-more-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/taslak-ce-2025-05-21T015131.362.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/taslak-ce-2025-05-21T015131.362.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Rejects Ripple and SEC: Will the XRP Lawsuit Continue? </title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/ripple-sec-xrp-lawsuit-update/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/ripple-sec-xrp-lawsuit-update/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeliz Akmaca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 08:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockchain law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crypto Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ripple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ripple latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ripple SEC lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC crypto regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xrp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XRP current price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xrp lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xrp price analysis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=42482</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ripple and SEC Forced to Step Back  The ongoing XRP lawsuit between Ripple and the SEC has reached another critical point. U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District of New York rejected the joint motion for a ruling and settlement submitted by both parties. Hopes for a swift resolution have been temporarily delayed. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/ripple-sec-xrp-lawsuit-update/">Court Rejects Ripple and SEC: Will the XRP Lawsuit Continue? </a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><span data-c>Ripple and SEC Forced to Step Back</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></h2>
<p><span data-c>The ongoing<strong> XRP lawsuit between Ripple and the SEC</strong> has reached another critical point. <strong>U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres</strong> of the Southern District of New York rejected the joint motion for a ruling and settlement submitted by both parties. Hopes for a swift resolution have been temporarily delayed.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c><strong>Ripple and the SEC</strong> had requested the <strong>$125 million</strong> penalty be reduced to <strong>$50 million</strong> and certain obligations to be lifted. However, the court found that this motion was not properly filed. </span></p>
<h2><span data-c>Court Speaks Clearly: Procedural Errors Determine the Outcome</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></h2>
<p><span data-c><strong>Judge Torres referred to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure</strong> 60(b). The parties failed to consider this rule in their submissions. This rule only allows exceptions under extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, the court stated it could not review the motion.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span><span data-c>Additionally, presenting the requests as a settlement did not simplify the process. The court emphasized its duty to consider the public interest. The parties&#8217; expectations were not met.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>Defense attorney <strong>James Filan</strong> explained on social media that the decision was based on procedure. According to him, the requests were not rejected but were dismissed due to incorrect filing.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span><span data-c>Meanwhile, legal expert <strong>Fred Rispoli</strong> warned about the process ahead. He said <strong>Ripple and the SEC</strong> would refile their motion properly. However, this time, the court must be convincingly persuaded of the public interest.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<h2><span data-c>XRP Price Drops</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></h2>
<p><span data-c>Following the decision, <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/wellgistics-health-xrp-payment-revolution/">XRP</a> experienced a sharp decline. Losing over<strong> 4%, XRP</strong> fell to around $2.45. Naturally, this caused anxiety among investors. The prolonged lawsuit has reduced <strong>short-term market</strong> confidence.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span><span data-c><strong>Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer,</strong> Stuart Alderoty, stated that the ruling does not affect the determination that <strong>XRP</strong> is not a security. He also emphasized that both parties agreed on the settlement and will revisit the court process.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>Legal analysts <strong>MetaLawMan and Bill Morgan also</strong> issued warnings. Both believe it has become more difficult for judges to overturn previous rulings. This means the case will become more complicated for <strong>Ripple</strong> and the SEC.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><em class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://t.me/coinengineernews" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><strong class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">Telegram, </strong></a><a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><strong class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">YouTube</strong></a>, and <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><strong class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">Twitter</strong></a> channels for the latest <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">news</a> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/ripple-sec-xrp-lawsuit-update/">Court Rejects Ripple and SEC: Will the XRP Lawsuit Continue? </a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/ripple-sec-xrp-lawsuit-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/taslak-ce-2025-05-15T235229.115.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/taslak-ce-2025-05-15T235229.115.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
