<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>SEC Solana Archives - Coin Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/sec-solana/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/sec-solana/</link>
	<description>Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Solana ETFs Face Delays Amid SEC Scrutiny</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solana-etfs-face-delays-amid-sec-scrutiny/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solana-etfs-face-delays-amid-sec-scrutiny/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanju Akbıyık]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC Solana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solana ETF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=27176</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A source acquainted with the matter claims that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) discussed its worries over Solana&#8217;s possible security before the Cboe BZX eliminated related 19b-4 filings. 19b-4 Filings Withdrawn Following the talks, the SEC and the CBO decided not to send the 19b-4 forms to the Federal Register, therefore triggering the</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/solana-etfs-face-delays-amid-sec-scrutiny/">Solana ETFs Face Delays Amid SEC Scrutiny</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A source acquainted with the matter claims that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) discussed its worries over <strong>Solana&#8217;s</strong> possible security before the Cboe BZX eliminated related 19b-4 filings.</p>
<h2>19b-4 Filings Withdrawn</h2>
<p>Following the talks, the SEC and the CBO decided not to send the 19b-4 forms to the Federal Register, therefore triggering the clock on the approval procedure. By doing this, the SEC would have been under pressure to decide on issues involving the future <strong>Solana ETFs</strong>.</p>
<p>The 19b-4 filings, which are filed by exchanges on behalf of issuers, no longer show on the Cboe website, as observed over the weekend. Furthermore not on the Federal Register right now are they. ETFs must be approved using S-1 registration statements to be operative and the 19b-4 forms. The S-1 forms, but avoid imposing precise deadlines on the SEC.</p>
<p>The S-1 registration statement of VanEck for the <strong>Solana ETF</strong> still shows on EDGAR, the reporting mechanism used by the SEC. Though the direct URL still works, search results no longer show the S-1 registration statement file for 21Shares.</p>
<h2>SEC’s Position on Solana</h2>
<p>Given that the agency had earlier termed <strong>Solana</strong> a security in several court filings, the person added, issuers were not surprised by the SEC reaching out with this posture. Nor was there the notion that these programs might fail. The source added that they expect subsequent filings or changes to the 19b-4s, which would aim to more aggressively establish the case that <strong>Solana</strong> is not a security.</p>
<h2>Industry Reactions</h2>
<p>&#8220;<em>We are unable to comment on the regulatory process at this time. We remain committed to expanding investor access to cryptocurrencies in the U.S. market and around the world</em>,&#8221; added Audrey Belloff, head of communications at 21Shares.</p>
<p>While both Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have passed the required legal requirements and began trading, most market analysts had anticipated the SEC would be considerably more reluctant to sanction the new <strong>Solana</strong> products. Under the present Biden Administration, Nate Geraci, president of financial advisor The ETF Store, advised on Aug. 17 that <strong>Solana ETFs</strong> would not have an opportunity for approval.</p>
<p>This was <a href="https://x.com/JSeyff/status/1806322096924217412">repeated on X</a> by ETF specialist Bloomberg Intelligence James Seyffart, who said on X that the fund <em>“only has a shot to launch sometime in 2025 if we have a new admin in the White House and SEC. Even then not guaranteed.”</em></p>
<p>VanEck contends <strong>Solana</strong> is a commodity and operates like Bitcoin and Ether, while the SEC claims it is a security.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://t.me/coinengineernews" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><strong class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">Telegram, </strong></a><a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><strong class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">YouTube</strong></a>, and <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><strong class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">Twitter</strong></a> channels for </em><em class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">the latest <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">news</a> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/solana-etfs-face-delays-amid-sec-scrutiny/">Solana ETFs Face Delays Amid SEC Scrutiny</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solana-etfs-face-delays-amid-sec-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/maxresdefault-1.jpg' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/maxresdefault-1.jpg' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
