<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>SIMD-228 Archives - Coin Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/simd-228/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/simd-228/</link>
	<description>Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 07:09:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Solana’s Inflation Cut Proposal Fails to Pass!</title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solanas-inflation-cut-proposal-fails-to-pass/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solanas-inflation-cut-proposal-fails-to-pass/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yigit Taha OZTURK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeFi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memecoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multicoin Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIMD-228]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solana Compass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solana governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solana Price Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tushar Jain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Validators]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=38423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SIMD-228, which proposed dynamically adjusting Solana’s inflation rate, failed to gain enough support. However, this is seen as a victory for the network’s governance process. Solana’s Inflation Adjustment Proposal Rejected Multicoin Capital co-founder Tushar Jain stated that despite the proposal failing, this was an important step for the Solana ecosystem and its governance process. The</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/solanas-inflation-cut-proposal-fails-to-pass/">Solana’s Inflation Cut Proposal Fails to Pass!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p data-start="54" data-end="239"><strong data-start="54" data-end="66">SIMD-228</strong>, which proposed dynamically adjusting <strong data-start="105" data-end="115">Solana</strong>’s inflation rate, failed to gain enough support. However, this is seen as a victory for the network’s governance process.</p>
<h2 data-start="241" data-end="297">Solana’s Inflation Adjustment Proposal Rejected</h2>
<p data-start="299" data-end="475"><strong data-start="299" data-end="320">Multicoin Capital</strong> co-founder <strong data-start="332" data-end="347">Tushar Jain</strong> stated that despite the proposal failing, this was an important step for the <strong data-start="425" data-end="445">Solana ecosystem</strong> and its governance process.</p>
<p data-start="477" data-end="746">The vote saw participation from <strong data-start="509" data-end="527">910 validators</strong>, representing <strong data-start="542" data-end="570">74% of the staked supply</strong>. However, only <strong data-start="586" data-end="610">43.6% voted in favor</strong>, while <strong data-start="618" data-end="641">27.4% voted against</strong> and <strong data-start="646" data-end="664">3.3% abstained</strong>. The proposal required <strong data-start="688" data-end="698">66.67%</strong> approval to pass but received only <strong data-start="734" data-end="743">61.4%</strong>.</p>
<p data-start="748" data-end="879"><strong data-start="748" data-end="767">Solana’s X team</strong> emphasized that the voter turnout was <strong data-start="806" data-end="876">higher than every U.S. presidential election in the last 100 years</strong>.</p>
<p data-start="748" data-end="879"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-151051 size-full" src="https://coinmuhendisi.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/solana.jpeg" alt="Solana" width="613" height="510" /></p>
<h2 data-start="881" data-end="919">What Was the Proposal’s Goal?</h2>
<p data-start="921" data-end="1161"><strong data-start="921" data-end="933">SIMD-228</strong> aimed to transition <strong data-start="954" data-end="964">Solana</strong>’s inflation system from a <strong data-start="991" data-end="1009">fixed schedule</strong> to a <strong data-start="1015" data-end="1046">dynamic, market-based model</strong>. The new system would adjust inflation rates based on staking participation to prevent excessive token issuance.</p>
<hr />
<p data-start="1163" data-end="1461"><strong><em>You Might Be Interested In: <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/elon-musk-talks-about-the-name-of-a-new-memecoin/">Elon Musk Talks About the Name of a New Memecoin!</a></em></strong></p>
<hr />
<p data-start="1163" data-end="1461">Currently, <strong data-start="1174" data-end="1184">Solana</strong>&#8216;s annual inflation rate starts at <strong data-start="1219" data-end="1225">8%</strong>, decreasing by <strong data-start="1241" data-end="1248">15%</strong> per year until it reaches <strong data-start="1275" data-end="1283">1.5%</strong>. However, the new model could have reduced inflation by <strong data-start="1340" data-end="1353">up to 80%</strong>. As of now, <strong data-start="1366" data-end="1376">Solana</strong>’s inflation rate stands at <strong data-start="1404" data-end="1413">4.66%</strong>, with only <strong data-start="1425" data-end="1458">3% of the total supply staked</strong>.</p>
<p data-start="1463" data-end="1735">High inflation can <strong data-start="1482" data-end="1511">increase selling pressure</strong>, lower <strong data-start="1519" data-end="1534">SOL’s price</strong>, and discourage network activity. The proposed system aimed to stabilize the network by adjusting inflation rates based on staking participation while encouraging <strong data-start="1698" data-end="1732">more active use of SOL in DeFi</strong>.</p>
<p data-start="1463" data-end="1735"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-151052 size-full" src="https://coinmuhendisi.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/solana-2.jpeg" alt="Solana" width="862" height="500" /></p>
<h2 data-start="2035" data-end="2076">How Did This Affect SOL’s Price?</h2>
<p data-start="2078" data-end="2481">The rejection of the proposal did not trigger significant volatility in <strong data-start="2150" data-end="2157">SOL</strong>’s price. <strong data-start="2167" data-end="2174">SOL</strong> dropped <strong data-start="2183" data-end="2191">1.5%</strong> on the day, falling just below <strong data-start="2223" data-end="2231">$125</strong>. However, following the <strong data-start="2256" data-end="2281">memecoin bubble burst</strong>, <strong data-start="2283" data-end="2290">SOL</strong> has lost nearly <strong data-start="2307" data-end="2314">60%</strong> of its value over the past two months. Additionally, <strong data-start="2368" data-end="2396">Solana’s network revenue</strong> has declined by <strong data-start="2413" data-end="2425">over 90%</strong> due to reduced memecoin minting and trading activity.</p>
<hr />
<p data-start="2078" data-end="2481"><em>You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <a href="https://t.me/coinengineernews" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>Telegram, </strong></a><a href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>YouTube</strong></a>, and <a href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener"><strong>Twitter</strong></a> channels for the latest <a title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7">news</a> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/solanas-inflation-cut-proposal-fails-to-pass/">Solana’s Inflation Cut Proposal Fails to Pass!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/solanas-inflation-cut-proposal-fails-to-pass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Solana-Co-Founder-Sued.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Solana-Co-Founder-Sued.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
