<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>token fraud Archives - Coin Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/token-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/tag/token-fraud/</link>
	<description>Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:35:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Shock Blow to Crypto Exchanges: 19 Accounts Suspended on X! </title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/shock-blow-to-crypto-exchanges-19-accounts-suspended-on-x/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/shock-blow-to-crypto-exchanges-19-accounts-suspended-on-x/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeliz Akmaca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[EN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AutoRug scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto API violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto community impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crypto Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto suspension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto trading ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meme coin market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pump-and-dump schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pump.fun ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solana projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[token fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[token launch issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorized API use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X platform crackdown]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=44501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Pump.fun, a Solana-based platform, had its official X account suspended on June 16, 2025. This caused a wide reaction in the crypto community and sparked many speculations. The personal X account of Pump.fun’s founder, Alon Cohen, was also suspended.  Reasons for X Suspensions and Speculations  The official reason for the suspensions has not yet been</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/shock-blow-to-crypto-exchanges-19-accounts-suspended-on-x/">Shock Blow to Crypto Exchanges: 19 Accounts Suspended on X! </a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span data-c><strong>Pump.fun,</strong> a <strong>Solana-based</strong> platform, had its official <strong>X account suspended</strong> on June 16, 2025. This caused a wide reaction in the crypto community and sparked many speculations. The personal X account of <strong>Pump.fun’s founder, Alon Cohen</strong>, was also suspended.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<h2><span data-c>Reasons for X Suspensions and Speculations</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></h2>
<p><span data-c>The official reason for the suspensions has not yet been disclosed by X platform or <strong>Pump.fun officials</strong>. Meanwhile, <strong>X suspended</strong> more than <strong>20 crypto</strong>-related accounts on Monday.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter wp-image-44502" src="https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ekran-goruntusu-2025-06-17-102703.png" alt="pump.fun" width="887" height="619" srcset="https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ekran-goruntusu-2025-06-17-102703.png 940w, https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ekran-goruntusu-2025-06-17-102703-300x209.png 300w, https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Ekran-goruntusu-2025-06-17-102703-768x536.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 887px) 100vw, 887px" /></p>
<p><span data-c>Some reports suggest that <strong>Pump.fun</strong> or related third-party tools may have violated X’s <strong>API</strong> usage policies. X has recently taken a strict stance on unauthorized API usage. In a class-action lawsuit filed in January, investors accused Pump.fun of orchestrating <strong>pump-and-dump</strong> schemes. They claimed the company earned approximately <strong>$500 million</strong> from each token it created, alleging these were unregistered securities.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>Fraud allegations such as &#8220;<strong>AutoRug</strong>&#8221; (automatic rug pull) in some token projects and liquidity problems may have triggered further scrutiny of the platform. The suspension coinciding with Pump.fun’s planned launch of its native token, &#8220;<a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/memecoin-cilginligi-buyuyor-pump-fun-1-milyar-dolar-toplamaya-hazirlaniyor/"><strong>$PUMP</strong></a>,&#8221; is also noteworthy.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>According to a list compiled by X user &#8220;Otto,&#8221; at least <strong>19 more accounts</strong> linked to crypto trading platforms <strong>GMGN, BullX, Bloom Trading</strong>, and AI tool <strong>Eliza OS</strong> were taken offline.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<h2><span data-c>Impact on Market and Community</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></h2>
<p><span data-c>The suspension of <strong>Pump.fun’s X account</strong> creates a significant gap in the platform’s marketing and communication channels, which may negatively affect its operations and user engagement in the short term. Some community members view this as a positive development that could reduce excessive speculation in the meme coin market, while others worry about potential negative effects on token launches and overall market sentiment.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>While the exact reason for the suspension remains unclear, this incident is seen as an indication of <strong>X platform’s</strong> increased control over crypto-related accounts.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><em class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <span class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://t.me/coinengineernews" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">Telegram</a>, <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">YouTube</a></span><span class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">,</span> and <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><span class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">Twitter</span></a> channels for the latest<span class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"> <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">news</a></span> and updates.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/shock-blow-to-crypto-exchanges-19-accounts-suspended-on-x/">Shock Blow to Crypto Exchanges: 19 Accounts Suspended on X! </a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/shock-blow-to-crypto-exchanges-19-accounts-suspended-on-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/taslak-ce-2025-06-17T105350.922.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/taslak-ce-2025-06-17T105350.922.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Accuses Unicoin of $100 Million Securities Fraud! </title>
		<link>https://coinengineer.net/blog/sec-sues-unicoin-100m-crypto-fraud/</link>
					<comments>https://coinengineer.net/blog/sec-sues-unicoin-100m-crypto-fraud/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeliz Akmaca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 10:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Crypto News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crypto Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crypto scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptocurrency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate tokens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[token fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unicoin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://coinengineer.net/blog/?p=42815</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The SEC has filed a lawsuit against the cryptocurrency company Unicoin and its executives, alleging securities fraud exceeding $100 million. The lawsuit is based on claims that the company raised substantial funds by making misleading statements to investors.  What is Unicoin and Why is it Targeted?  Unicoin claimed to investors that its tokens were backed</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/sec-sues-unicoin-100m-crypto-fraud/">SEC Accuses Unicoin of $100 Million Securities Fraud! </a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span data-c><strong>The SEC has filed a lawsuit against the cryptocurrency company Unicoin and its executives, alleging securities fraud exceeding $100 million</strong>. The lawsuit is based on claims that the company raised substantial funds by making misleading statements to investors.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<h2><span data-c>What is Unicoin and Why is it Targeted?</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></h2>
<p><span data-c><strong>Unicoin</strong> claimed to investors that its tokens were backed by an international portfolio of valuable real estate and raised funds with these promises. The company showcased real estate worth <strong>$1.4 billion in countries</strong> such as Argentina, Thailand, Antigua, and the Bahamas. However, the <strong>SEC</strong> alleges that <strong>Unicoin</strong> never purchased most of these properties and overstated their value. <strong>According to the SEC</strong>, the total value of the properties did not even reach $300 million, and most transactions were never completed. Additionally, while the company claimed its tokens were “<strong>asset-backed,</strong>” it did not grant investors any rights over these assets.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><strong>Mark Cave, Deputy Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division, stated: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p><span data-c>“We allege that Unicoin and its executives exploited thousands of investors with false promises that their tokens would be backed by real-world assets, including an international portfolio of valuable real estate. However, as we allege, the real estate assets were worth only a fraction of what the company claimed.”</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p></blockquote>
<p><span data-c>Furthermore, the <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/paul-atkins-crypto-struggle-in-sec-uncertainty/"><strong>SEC</strong></a> claims that <strong>Unicoin sold 37.9 million</strong> unregistered rights certificates, marketed with the expectation that they would be converted into tokens, misleading investors.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<hr />
<p class="entry-title"><a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/us-wants-bitcoin-over-gold-survey-results/"><em><strong>US Wants Bitcoin Instead of Gold! New Survey Surprises </strong></em></a></p>
<hr />
<p><span data-c>CEO Alex Konanykhin, announced that he rejected the <strong>SEC’s settlement</strong> offer.<strong> Konanykhin</strong> claims the company operated entirely legally and that the tokens are backed by real assets, including real estate in the<strong> Bahamas and Thailand</strong>, copper mining rights in Argentina, and investments in various ventures. The lawsuit also notes <strong>Unicoin’s</strong> claim of promising investors returns exceeding <strong>9,000,000%</strong>, which has reportedly been removed from the company’s website.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><span data-c>The <strong>SEC states that Unicoin’s</strong> aggressive marketing campaigns in airports, New York taxis, social media, and TV advertisements attracted thousands of investors. Through these efforts, the company reportedly raised millions of dollars from over<strong> 5,000</strong> investors. The SEC alleges in its lawsuit that Unicoin and its executives violated securities laws by making misleading statements to investors. Consequently, the lawsuit raises serious questions about the accuracy and transparency of the information Unicoin provided to investors.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p><em class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://t.me/coinengineernews" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><strong class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">Telegram, </strong></a><a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://www.youtube.com/@CoinEngineer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener nofollow" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><strong class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">YouTube</strong></a>, and <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" href="https://twitter.com/coinengineers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)"><strong class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">Twitter</strong></a> channels for </em><em class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_processed" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">the latest <a class="darkmysite_style_txt_border darkmysite_style_link darkmysite_processed" title="News" href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/news/" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c="7" data-darkmysite_alpha_bg="rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)">news</a> and updates.</em></p>
<p><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog/sec-sues-unicoin-100m-crypto-fraud/">SEC Accuses Unicoin of $100 Million Securities Fraud! </a> appeared first on <a href="https://coinengineer.net/blog">Coin Engineer</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://coinengineer.net/blog/sec-sues-unicoin-100m-crypto-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<media:content url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/taslak-ce-2025-05-21T120242.025.png' type='image/webp' medium='image' width='1920' height='1080'><media:title type='plain'> <![CDATA[USA]]></media:title><media:thumbnail url='https://coinengineer.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/taslak-ce-2025-05-21T120242.025.png' width='58' height='33' /></media:content>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
