Weak economic data from the United States combined with ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East has pushed investors toward scarce assets. Bitcoin has been among the assets benefiting from this shift in market sentiment.

Weak Economic Data Boosts Demand for Bitcoin

Recent economic figures from the United States indicate a noticeable slowdown in growth. The U.S. economy expanded by only 0.7% during the final quarter of 2025, a figure that represents a significant downward revision from earlier estimates. The final report is expected to be released on April 9, but the weaker data has already fueled concerns about a potential recession in 2026.

These developments have influenced investor behavior in traditional markets. Yields on the U.S. 10-year Treasury climbed to 4.26%, reflecting higher return expectations from investors holding government bonds. In an environment marked by uncertainty and rising yields, some investors have turned to limited-supply assets such as Bitcoin.

Meanwhile, equity markets have shown relative resilience. The S&P 500 is currently trading roughly 5% below its all-time high, suggesting that risk appetite has not completely disappeared.

Geopolitical Tensions and Oil Prices Add Pressure

Another factor influencing global markets is the ongoing conflict in Iran and the resulting surge in oil prices. At one point, oil briefly spiked to $119.50 per barrel, creating additional volatility across financial markets.

The U.S. government’s temporary decision to allow the purchase of Russian oil that had been stranded at sea helped ease some of the immediate concerns. Following the announcement, oil prices pulled back slightly.

However, oil prices remain roughly $30 higher than levels seen before the conflict began. Elevated energy costs can contribute to inflationary pressure and reduce consumer spending, which may ultimately limit the amount of capital retail investors allocate to cryptocurrency markets.

Institutional Demand and ETF Flows

Institutional interest appears to be another driver behind Bitcoin’s recent strength. Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds recorded four consecutive days of net inflows totaling approximately $583 million.

In addition, estimates suggest that Strategy accumulated more than $900 million worth of Bitcoin through its yield-oriented STRC financial instrument. These developments indicate that institutional demand may be playing a role in supporting the current price momentum.

Has the Bear Market Actually Ended?

Despite the positive price action, analysts remain cautious about declaring the end of the broader correction that began after Bitcoin reached its $126,000 peak in October 2025.

Bitcoin’s 50-day correlation with the Nasdaq 100 stands at around 84%, indicating that movements in technology stocks could still influence the cryptocurrency’s performance. Furthermore, Bitcoin has recently underperformed gold, suggesting that investors may not yet view it as a reliable hedge during periods of economic stress.

ETF flow patterns also highlight an important dynamic. Between late February and early March, about $2.14 billion flowed into spot Bitcoin ETFs, helping drive a 14% price rally. However, when those flows reversed, Bitcoin declined roughly 10% within a few days. This suggests ETF activity may be reacting to price movements rather than leading them.

While Bitcoin has repeatedly tested the $64,000 support level and spent nearly five weeks consolidating, the market has yet to produce a clear breakout signal. As a result, whether Bitcoin can maintain its position above $70,000 could remain one of the key factors shaping short-term investor sentiment.

In the comment section, you can freely share your comments about the topic. Additionally, don’ t forget to follow us on Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter for the latest news and updates.

The post Bitcoin Rises: But the Bear Market May Not Be Over Yet appeared first on Coin Engineer.

His remarks suggest that progress in the Senate could move at a slower pace, prolonging the uncertainty surrounding comprehensive crypto regulation in the U.S.

Clarity Act Unlikely to Pass Committee Before April

According to comments from Senate leadership, the Clarity Act is not expected to move through the Senate Banking Committee in the immediate term. Thune stated that it would be difficult for the proposal to clear the committee before April.

The Clarity Act is widely viewed as an important effort to define how digital assets should be regulated within the U.S. financial system. The legislation aims to clarify the legal status of cryptocurrencies, outline the responsibilities of market participants, and establish a clearer division of regulatory authority among government agencies.

While the bill has made progress in the House of Representatives, discussions in the Senate remain ongoing, highlighting the complexity of building consensus around digital asset regulation.

Senate Approves Housing Bill With CBDC Restriction

In a separate development, the Senate recently approved a comprehensive housing bill that includes a provision restricting the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC).

The legislation has now been sent to the House of Representatives for further consideration. The inclusion of the CBDC-related clause reflects the continuing political debate in the United States over whether the Federal Reserve should introduce a government-backed digital currency.

SAVE America Act Takes Legislative Priority

At the same time, another proposal has taken priority in the congressional agenda: the SAVE America Act. The Senate is expected to vote on the measure in the coming week.

The bill focuses on election procedures and would require individuals to provide official documentation proving citizenship when registering to vote. Former President Donald Trump has publicly supported the legislation and previously stated that he would not sign other bills until the measure is passed.

This prioritization of other legislative matters may also contribute to delays in advancing crypto-related regulation.

Ongoing Debate Over Stablecoins

Discussions surrounding digital asset regulation also extend to the stablecoin sector. One of the most debated issues involves whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer yield-like returns to users.

Traditional banks argue that such practices could draw deposits away from the banking system while avoiding the regulatory requirements that banks must follow. On the other hand, some policymakers believe properly regulated stablecoins could actually strengthen the U.S. financial system.

Supporters of the latter view argue that compliant stablecoin frameworks may attract international capital into the American banking ecosystem rather than weakening it.

Regulatory Clarity Could Be a Major Catalyst

Despite uncertainty surrounding the legislative timeline, policy analysts generally agree that a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets could become a significant catalyst for the industry.

Clear rules may encourage greater participation from institutional investors and financial institutions that have so far remained cautious due to regulatory ambiguity. Increased institutional involvement could, in turn, bring more liquidity and long-term stability to the crypto market.

For now, the direction and timing of U.S. crypto regulation remain closely watched by both the digital asset industry and traditional financial institutions worldwide.

Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Is Clarity Act Being Postponed? Here Are Possible Dates! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Oil Trading on Hyperliquid Reaches Record Levels!

One of the clearest examples of this trend is the oil trading activity observed on the Hyperliquid platform. According to platform data, the trading volume of perpetual futures contracts based on West Texas Intermediate crude oil (WTI) exceeded $1.6 billion in the last 24 hours. As a result, the CL-USDC contract has become the second most active market on the platform in terms of trading volume, following Bitcoin.

Geopolitical Tensions Boost Demand for Oil

Global developments appear to play a significant role in the rising interest in tokenized commodities. While supply concerns have emerged in energy markets due to tensions between the US, Israel, and Iran, oil prices briefly surged to around $120 per barrel.

Prices later pulled back somewhat after US President Donald Trump stated that the conflict could end soon. However, during this period, investors’ shift toward commodities such as oil for hedging purposes stood out.

The rapid rise in popularity of oil on Hyperliquid also recalls a similar trend previously seen on the platform. Earlier, silver-based contracts had also become high-volume macro investment instruments.

Crypto Infrastructure Offers an Alternative to Global Markets

The demand for tokenized assets also reveals a change in the ways investors access global markets. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan recalled that following Donald Trump’s announcement of military operations against Iran, while traditional markets were closed, investors continued trading using crypto infrastructure.

This situation highlights an important advantage provided by crypto-based market infrastructure. Through tokenized commodities, investors can gain direct on-chain exposure to global macro assets such as oil, gold, or silver while remaining within the blockchain ecosystem.

Boundaries Between Traditional Finance and Crypto Are Blurring

The tokenization trend is not limited to crypto investors alone. Traditional financial institutions are also trying to adapt to this transformation. In this context, Nasdaq has initiated a collaboration with Payward (the parent company of crypto exchange Kraken) to develop a system that integrates tokenized stock markets with blockchain networks.

The goal of this initiative is to modernize the buying, selling, and settlement processes of securities, creating a more efficient and accessible financial infrastructure.

According to experts, the increasing interest in tokenized commodities such as oil may represent a temporary rotation in investor preferences. However, some analysts believe this could be a sign of a structural change, indicating that as crypto markets mature, global finance will become increasingly intertwined with blockchain-based systems.

What is Hyperliquid? What Does It Do?

Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, please follow us on our Telegram, YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Hyperliquid Oil Contracts See Record Demand! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

While short-term volatility is common in the cryptocurrency market, the current move appears closely linked to developments across global financial markets rather than crypto-specific factors alone.

Rising Global Uncertainty Weighs on Risk Assets Such as Bitcoin

In recent days, investors have increasingly adopted a defensive stance. Escalating geopolitical risks and growing uncertainty in international markets are prompting traders to reduce exposure to higher-risk assets.

This shift in sentiment has not been limited to cryptocurrencies. Equity markets and commodities are also reacting to the changing risk environment. When global uncertainty increases, investors typically rebalance their portfolios by moving capital away from volatile assets and toward instruments perceived as more stable.

As a result, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are experiencing temporary downside pressure alongside other growth-oriented assets.

Oil Prices Surge Amid Middle East Tensions

The impact of these developments is also being felt in the energy market. Oil prices rose above $88, increasing by 4.76% in the last 24 hours. This increase is believed to be influenced by the risks that tensions in the Middle East could create for energy supply.

Market participants attribute the sharp rise primarily to concerns that escalating tensions in the Middle East could disrupt global energy supply. Any threat to oil production or transportation routes often triggers rapid price increases, as traders factor potential shortages into market expectations.

Higher energy prices can also influence broader financial conditions by increasing inflationary pressures and adding to global economic uncertainty.

Stronger Dollar and Higher Bond Yields Reflect Market Caution

The cautious mood is also evident in traditional financial indicators. The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY), which measures the dollar’s strength against a basket of major currencies, has moved above the 99 level. At the same time, the yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury has risen to approximately 4.16%.

Both developments suggest that investors are gravitating toward dollar-denominated assets and government bonds, which are often viewed as safer during periods of market stress.

Technology Stocks and Crypto-Related Shares Under Pressure

The shift toward a risk-off environment is also impacting technology equities. The Invesco QQQ ETF, which tracks the Nasdaq-100 index, slipped about 0.5% in pre-market trading.

Companies closely tied to the cryptocurrency ecosystem have shown similar weakness. Shares of firms such as Strategy, Coinbase, and MARA Holdings have also declined in pre-market activity, reflecting broader caution among investors.

These movements highlight how cryptocurrency markets can at times move in tandem with traditional financial assets, particularly technology stocks.

Geopolitical Tensions are Putting Pressure on Risky Assets Like Bitcoin

The ongoing tensions in the Middle East remain one of the primary drivers behind the current market environment. The conflict, which has persisted for roughly a week, has already influenced energy markets and investor sentiment worldwide.

As geopolitical uncertainty rises, investors often prioritize capital preservation over growth opportunities. In such periods, riskier assets—including Bitcoin and high-growth technology stocks—can face short-term selling pressure.

Looking ahead, developments in global geopolitics and shifts in investor risk appetite are likely to remain key factors influencing both cryptocurrency markets and traditional financial assets.

Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, please follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Why Did Bitcoin Fall? Risk Aversion Trend is Strengthening! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Gold Rebounds on Safe-Haven Demand

With uncertainty mounting, gold has regained upward momentum. Spot gold advanced 1.3% to $5,161.5 per ounce, while U.S. April gold futures rose 0.8%, trading at $5,165.80 per ounce. The recovery comes after a sharp pullback the previous session, when the metal fell more than 4% amid a stronger U.S. dollar and fading expectations of near-term rate cuts.

The latest rebound marks a recovery from the lowest levels seen in a week. Despite recent volatility, the broader structural drivers behind gold remain intact. Persistent geopolitical uncertainty, policy unpredictability, and the need for portfolio diversification continue to underpin medium-term support for the metal.

Energy Markets React to Supply Concerns

Tensions involving the United States, Israel, and Iran have intensified concerns over potential disruptions to energy supply. Actions targeting energy infrastructure and maritime activity in the Gulf region have heightened fears of reduced output across a corridor stretching from Qatar to Iraq. As a result, both oil and natural gas prices have experienced sharp upward moves.

Market analysts caution that sustained increases in energy prices could reintroduce inflationary pressures at a delicate time for global monetary policy. Rising oil prices in particular may complicate central banks’ efforts to transition toward looser financial conditions.

Inflation Expectations and Rate Outlook

Elevated energy costs combined with geopolitical instability have pushed inflation expectations back into focus. Market participants widely anticipate that the U.S. Federal Reserve will keep interest rates unchanged at its March 18 meeting.

Broader Precious Metals Performance

The upward move in gold has been mirrored by gains across the broader precious metals complex. Spot silver surged 3.1% to $84.61 per ounce, while platinum rose 2.1% to $2,126.50 per ounce. Palladium was trading at $1,673.38 per ounce.

Overall, the market response underscores a clear shift toward defensive assets as geopolitical risks intensify and macroeconomic uncertainty remains elevated.

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

You can join our Telegram channel to not miss the news and stay informed about the crypto world.

The post Gold, Silver and Oil Climb Again! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

A historically prolonged government shutdown, partisan disagreements over ethics issues, and ongoing debates surrounding stablecoin yield provisions have all contributed to the slowdown. With the November midterm elections now just eight months away, the legislative calendar is becoming increasingly compressed.

Partial Progress in Committees, Broader Uncertainty Remains

The bill effectively has two core components. A version focused on commodity market oversight has already cleared the Senate Agriculture Committee, marking a tangible step forward. However, the securities law portion—falling under the jurisdiction of the Senate Banking Committee—has yet to receive formal consideration. A scheduled markup session in January was cancelled, reinforcing the perception that progress has stalled.

Some industry observers argue that the legislation is effectively “on hold.” Earlier projections suggesting passage as soon as April now appear overly optimistic given the current political climate. Without coordinated movement between committees, advancing a unified framework will be difficult.

Crypto Market Conditions and Political Realities

Shifting market dynamics may also be influencing the pace of legislative urgency. During periods of strong crypto market performance, traditional financial institutions were more actively developing digital asset strategies, and regulatory agencies appeared more motivated to clarify oversight boundaries. As market conditions have cooled, that sense of urgency has diminished.

Moreover, digital asset regulation remains a technically complex topic that many lawmakers perceive as niche relative to broader voter concerns. In an election year, Congress typically prioritizes highly visible policy issues, making it harder for specialized financial legislation to gain traction.

The Stablecoin Yield Debate

One of the most contentious elements of the bill involves whether stablecoin holders should be permitted to earn yield through third-party platforms. This issue has reportedly prompted multiple meetings at the White House involving administration officials as well as representatives from both the crypto and banking sectors. Some banking stakeholders argue that allowing such yield mechanisms could disrupt existing financial industry dynamics.

At the same time, certain industry participants remain cautiously optimistic that compromises can be reached. However, beyond earlier aspirational timelines, few concrete details have emerged publicly.

How Will Election Calendar Pressure Affect the Crypto Law?

The 2026 election cycle is already underway in several states, with primaries scheduled in Arkansas, North Carolina, and Texas. The Senate is also expected to recess for approximately one month in August for state work periods, returning only two months before the general election.

Taken together, these factors significantly narrow the legislative window. Unless meaningful bipartisan consensus is achieved soon, the likelihood increases that comprehensive crypto market structure reform may be postponed until after the midterms.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Will the Crypto Market Structure Bill Pass Before the Midterms? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Record Open Interest in Oil Contracts

The open interest in the CL-USDC oil-linked perpetual contract on Hyperliquid has reached $50 million, marking an all-time high. While open interest remained relatively limited in mid-January, it gained significant momentum toward the end of February, showing a sharp rise. When examining the chart, a gradual increase throughout the month is followed by a parabolic surge in the most recent days.

This increase in open interest indicates fresh capital inflows to the market and growing appetite for leveraged positions. In crypto derivatives markets especially, open interest data is considered an important leading indicator of trend strength and investor expectations.

Strong Rise in Oil Prices Played a Major Role

As of the time this article was written, oil prices have surged 5.83% on a daily basis, reaching $82.51 per barrel. This strong rally demonstrates increased volatility in energy markets due to the conflict and shows that investors are seeking to profit from short-term price movements.

The fact that an commodity like oil — highly sensitive to macroeconomic and geopolitical developments — is attracting such intense interest on crypto derivatives platforms reveals that market participants are no longer limiting themselves to Bitcoin and altcoins alone.

Convergence of Crypto and Traditional Market Dynamics

The rising demand for commodity-linked perpetual contracts demonstrates that crypto markets are becoming increasingly integrated with traditional financial instruments. Thanks to stablecoin-collateralized oil contracts, investors can take positions on energy market price movements without needing access to classic futures exchanges.

This development highlights that the crypto ecosystem is evolving beyond mere digital asset speculation into an alternative derivatives infrastructure that provides access to global macro themes. The record open interest level can be seen as a concrete indicator of this transformation.

This content does not constitute investment advice in any way. Markets carry high risk, and it is essential to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

What is Hyperliquid? What Does It Do?

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Hyperliquid Oil Futures Break Record! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

What Is the CLARITY Act Designed to Do?

Commonly referred to as the CLARITY Act, the proposed bill seeks to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets in the United States. The legislation has already advanced in the House of Representatives, while discussions and negotiations continue in the Senate.

Two primary sticking points remain unresolved. The first concerns whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer yield or rewards to holders. Crypto-native firms argue that yield-bearing stablecoins are essential for competitiveness and innovation. Traditional banks, however, contend that allowing interest-like returns on stablecoin balances could draw deposits away from the banking system and introduce financial stability risks.

The second area of contention involves conflict-of-interest provisions. Some lawmakers are pushing for restrictions that would limit the ability of senior government officials — including the President — and their families to participate in certain crypto-related financial activities. Reports suggest that discussions between industry representatives, banking groups, and policymakers are ongoing, with the possibility of compromise still on the table.

Eight Potential Tailwinds if Passed

JPMorgan analysts outline eight potential benefits should the bill become law.

First, it would clearly distinguish between “digital commodities” regulated by the CFTC and “digital securities” overseen by the SEC, reducing compliance uncertainty. A grandfather provision could allow certain ETF-linked assets such as XRP, Solana, Litecoin, Hedera, Dogecoin, and Chainlink to fall under the more flexible CFTC framework.

Second, early-stage projects would be granted a transition period allowing up to $75 million in annual fundraising without full SEC registration while progressing toward decentralization. Third, tokens initially sold as securities could later transition to commodity status once sufficiently decentralized.

Fourth and fifth, clearer rules for intermediaries and custody could enable institutions like BNY Mellon and State Street to directly safeguard digital assets, while also supporting tokenization of traditional securities. Sixth, miners, validators, and software developers would receive exemptions from broker-style reporting during development under certain conditions.

Seventh, small crypto payments could qualify for tax exemptions, and staking taxation would gain clarity. Eighth, by defining stablecoins more as digital cash than investment products, the bill could shift institutional interest toward tokenized deposits.

If enacted by mid-year as anticipated, the CLARITY Act could significantly reshape the regulatory landscape and improve market structure clarity heading into the second half of the year.

Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, please follow us on our Telegram, YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post When Will the Clarity Act Be Approved? JPMorgan Gives a Date! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Hayes frames the issue through a macro-historical lens, suggesting that large-scale US military operations have often coincided with looser monetary conditions. In his view, extended geopolitical commitments tend to place fiscal pressure on Washington, creating an environment where expanding liquidity becomes a practical policy response.

Historical Examples: Wars and Fed Money Printing

Looking back at post-1985 conflicts in the Middle East, Hayes highlights several episodes where military involvement was followed by rate cuts or monetary easing. The 1990 Gulf War, the global war on terror after the September 11 attacks in 2001, and the 2009 troop surge in Afghanistan all occurred alongside periods of Federal Reserve accommodation.

His argument is that financing large-scale geopolitical strategies frequently requires supportive monetary conditions. If the US were to embark on a long-term and expensive political restructuring effort in Iran, similar dynamics could re-emerge. In such a scenario, lower interest rates and increased money supply would not only ease fiscal strain but also inject additional liquidity into global markets.

For digital assets, that liquidity expansion could serve as a tailwind. Historically, risk assets—including cryptocurrencies—have responded positively to periods of monetary easing.

A Wait-and-See Approach

Despite outlining a potentially bullish framework for crypto markets, Hayes advises caution. The scale and duration of US involvement in Iran remain uncertain, as does the political tolerance for sustained financial and geopolitical costs. For now, he suggests monitoring developments rather than front-running policy shifts.

In his assessment, the optimal entry point for Bitcoin and higher-quality altcoins would materialize only after the Fed explicitly signals rate cuts or balance sheet expansion.

Markets Remain Measured

Although weekend airstrikes by the US and Israel on Iranian targets triggered heightened rhetoric on social media, broader financial markets have not displayed signs of systemic panic. US stock futures opened with only modest declines, oil prices retraced roughly half of their initial surge, and the S&P 500 fell by less than 1%.

This muted reaction suggests that, at least for now, markets are not pricing in a full-scale global crisis. The key variable moving forward will be whether geopolitical escalation translates into a decisive shift in Federal Reserve policy.

This content is not investment advice.

Also, in the comment section, you can freely share your comments and opinions about the topic. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on Telegram, YouTube and Twitter for the latest news and updates.

The post Hayes: The Fed May Print Money to Offset Rising Geopolitical Tensions appeared first on Coin Engineer.

A sharp shift in funding rates, rising open interest, and elevated liquidation volumes collectively point to crowded bearish positioning in the futures market.

Funding Rates Drop to -6%

Bitcoin Perpetual futures funding rates fell to -6%, marking the second most negative reading in the past three months. The last time funding reached similarly depressed levels was on February 6, when Bitcoin formed a local bottom near $60,000.

Funding rates represent the periodic payments exchanged between long and short traders in perpetual futures markets. When rates are positive, long positions compensate shorts. When rates turn negative, short sellers pay long holders. Deeply negative funding typically reflects aggressive downside positioning, with traders willing to pay a premium to maintain bearish bets.

Such extreme readings often indicate one-sided sentiment, where a large portion of market participants are leaning heavily in the same direction.

Bitcoin Open Interest Climbs Despite Price Weakness

Over the past 24 hours, coin-margined open interest increased from 668,000 BTC to 687,000 Bitcoin. Measuring open interest in BTC terms removes distortions caused by price fluctuations and offers a clearer view of participation.

The combination of rising open interest and sharply negative funding suggests that new positions are being added, and that a growing share of traders are positioning for further downside. This buildup of short exposure increases the likelihood of a squeeze if price momentum shifts upward.

$500 Million in Liquidations

In the last 24 hours, more than $500 million in crypto positions were liquidated. Approximately $420 million of that total came from long positions, highlighting the scale of forced selling during the recent decline.

With many long positions flushed out and funding rates deeply negative, the market may now be tilted toward excessive short exposure.

$64,000 as a Trigger Level for Bitcoin

Bitcoin attempt to reclaim $64,000 is technically significant. A sustained move above that level could pressure heavily leveraged short positions, potentially triggering a cascade of liquidations and accelerating upward momentum.

Current derivatives metrics reflect elevated risk and crowded positioning. How price responds in the near term will determine whether this imbalance resolves through renewed downside—or a sharp short squeeze.

This content is not investment advice.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Growing Signs of a Bitcoin Short Squeeze appeared first on Coin Engineer.