{"id":39862,"date":"2025-04-08T15:00:20","date_gmt":"2025-04-08T12:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/?p=39862"},"modified":"2025-04-08T14:24:52","modified_gmt":"2025-04-08T11:24:52","slug":"panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/","title":{"rendered":"Panicked Bitcoiner Loses Over $70K in RBF Fee Error!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"\" data-start=\"4685\" data-end=\"5107\">Shortly after midnight UTC on April 8, a <strong data-start=\"4726\" data-end=\"4737\">Bitcoin<\/strong> user mistakenly paid <strong data-start=\"4759\" data-end=\"4771\">0.75 BTC<\/strong> ($70,500) in transaction fees due to a panic-driven use of <strong data-start=\"4831\" data-end=\"4855\">replace-by-fee (RBF)<\/strong>. The transaction was the user\u2019s second attempt to push a prior transaction through by raising the fee and changing the destination address. In the final version, a newly added unspent transaction output (UTXO) ended up being included fully in the fee.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"5109\" data-end=\"5454\">The initial transaction used a &#8220;default or conservative&#8221; fee setting. The user\u2019s first RBF attempt doubled the fee and altered the output address. But instead of confirming either of these transactions, a final RBF with a dramatically higher fee overrode them, causing the entire amount of the change \u2014 0.75 BTC \u2014 to be included as miner reward.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"5109\" data-end=\"5454\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-152984 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/coinmuhendisi.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/bitcoin.jpg\" alt=\"bitcoin\" width=\"1280\" height=\"539\" \/><\/p>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_71 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 eztoc-toggle-hide-by-default' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#Satoshi_Error_or_Bug_in_Wallet_Script\" title=\"Satoshi Error or Bug in Wallet Script?\">Satoshi Error or Bug in Wallet Script?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-4' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-4'><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-4' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#You_Might_Be_Interested_In_Elon_Musk_Talks_About_the_Name_of_a_New_Memecoin\" title=\"You Might Be Interested In: Elon Musk Talks About the Name of a New Memecoin!\">You Might Be Interested In: Elon Musk Talks About the Name of a New Memecoin!<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#RBF_Flexible_Feature_or_Dangerous_Tool\" title=\"RBF: Flexible Feature or Dangerous Tool?\">RBF: Flexible Feature or Dangerous Tool?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 data-start=\"5461\" data-end=\"5509\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Satoshi_Error_or_Bug_in_Wallet_Script\"><\/span>Satoshi Error or Bug in Wallet Script?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"5510\" data-end=\"5793\">According to <strong data-start=\"5523\" data-end=\"5537\">Anmol Jain<\/strong>, VP of Investigations at <strong data-start=\"5563\" data-end=\"5573\">AMLBot<\/strong>, the user may have made a simple yet costly mistake in fee calculation. Jain suggested the user likely meant to enter <strong data-start=\"5692\" data-end=\"5707\">30.5692 sat<\/strong>, but accidentally typed <strong data-start=\"5732\" data-end=\"5747\">305,692 sat<\/strong> \u2014 or confused <strong data-start=\"5762\" data-end=\"5772\">sat\/vB<\/strong> with total satoshis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"5795\" data-end=\"6051\">Another theory is that an automated wallet script contained a miscalculation. Some wallets allow fee settings in <strong data-start=\"5908\" data-end=\"5919\">sats\/vB<\/strong>, and such confusion can arise if the system interprets a small value as too low and prompts the user to increase it. Jain explains:<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"5795\" data-end=\"6051\"><em><span style=\"font-size: 14.4px;\">\u201cUser types 305000 thinking it\u2019s 30.5 sat\/vB, but the wallet applies 305,000 sat\/vB \u2014 which is insane.\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 data-start=\"1444\" data-end=\"1471\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"You_Might_Be_Interested_In_Elon_Musk_Talks_About_the_Name_of_a_New_Memecoin\"><\/span><strong><em>You Might Be Interested In: <a href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/elon-musk-talks-about-the-name-of-a-new-memecoin\/\">Elon Musk Talks About the Name of a New Memecoin!<\/a><\/em><\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"6160\" data-end=\"6438\">The mistake caused the wallet to treat a full UTXO of nearly 0.75 BTC as a transaction fee, likely due to not properly updating the change address or misreading the transaction structure. Both earlier transactions remained unconfirmed while the highest-fee version went through.<\/p>\n<h2 data-start=\"6445\" data-end=\"6495\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"RBF_Flexible_Feature_or_Dangerous_Tool\"><\/span>RBF: Flexible Feature or Dangerous Tool?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"6496\" data-end=\"6738\"><strong data-start=\"6496\" data-end=\"6514\">Replace-by-fee<\/strong> is a controversial but core feature in <strong data-start=\"6554\" data-end=\"6565\">Bitcoin<\/strong>. It allows users to replace unconfirmed transactions with higher-fee versions. Miners, motivated by profit, are expected to confirm the version that offers a higher reward.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"6740\" data-end=\"6975\">This mechanism has sparked debate. In 2019, <strong data-start=\"6784\" data-end=\"6800\">Bitcoin Cash<\/strong> advocate <strong data-start=\"6810\" data-end=\"6825\">Hayden Otto<\/strong> claimed RBF enabled double-spending. Bitcoin Cash removed RBF support and claimed unconfirmed transactions on its network were final and trustworthy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"6977\" data-end=\"7144\">Despite this, RBF-like behaviors have occurred on <strong data-start=\"7027\" data-end=\"7043\">Bitcoin Cash<\/strong> as well, showing that this feature is more a result of blockchain dynamics than a standalone switch.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"7205\" data-end=\"7550\"><em>You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don\u2019t forget to follow us on our\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/coinengineernews\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><strong>Telegram,\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@CoinEngineer\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><strong>YouTube<\/strong><\/a>,\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/coinengineers\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><strong>Twitter<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0channels for the latest\u00a0<a title=\"News\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/news\/\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"7\">news<\/a>\u00a0and updates.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Shortly after midnight UTC on April 8, a Bitcoin user mistakenly paid 0.75 BTC ($70,500) in transaction fees due to a panic-driven use of replace-by-fee (RBF). The transaction was the user\u2019s second attempt to push a prior transaction through by raising the fee and changing the destination address. In the final version, a newly added<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":39865,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,657,2],"tags":[14053,61,330,8115,14059,14057,60,14058,847,2267,14055,6720,14056,5452,14052,203,2271,3764,14054],"class_list":["post-39862","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-crypto-news","category-en","category-news","tag-amlbot","tag-bitcoin","tag-bitcoin-cash","tag-bitcoin-fee","tag-bitcoin-loss","tag-blockchain-feature","tag-btc","tag-crypto-mistake","tag-crypto-news","tag-crypto-wallet","tag-fee-error","tag-mempool","tag-panic-transaction","tag-rbf","tag-replace-by-fee","tag-satoshi","tag-transaction-fee","tag-utxo","tag-wallet-bug"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Panicked Bitcoiner Loses Over $70K in RBF Fee Error! - Coin Engineer<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Panicked Bitcoiner Loses Over $70K in RBF Fee Error! - Coin Engineer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Shortly after midnight UTC on April 8, a Bitcoin user mistakenly paid 0.75 BTC ($70,500) in transaction fees due to a panic-driven use of replace-by-fee (RBF). The transaction was the user\u2019s second attempt to push a prior transaction through by raising the fee and changing the destination address. In the final version, a newly added\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Coin Engineer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-08T12:00:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-08T11:24:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/bitcoin-2.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Yigit Taha OZTURK\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Yigit Taha OZTURK\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/\",\"name\":\"Panicked Bitcoiner Loses Over $70K in RBF Fee Error! - Coin Engineer\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/bitcoin-2.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-08T12:00:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-08T11:24:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5b75ba41894c1164f25378c9022397fc\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/bitcoin-2.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/bitcoin-2.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Panicked Bitcoiner Loses Over $70K in RBF Fee Error!\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Coin Engineer\",\"description\":\"Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5b75ba41894c1164f25378c9022397fc\",\"name\":\"Yigit Taha OZTURK\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3c58488c3e042b9f982e35ddee6f6e94f7d62613e8b36ebd312676655fab9908?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3c58488c3e042b9f982e35ddee6f6e94f7d62613e8b36ebd312676655fab9908?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Yigit Taha OZTURK\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/author\/ceyigitt\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Panicked Bitcoiner Loses Over $70K in RBF Fee Error! - Coin Engineer","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Panicked Bitcoiner Loses Over $70K in RBF Fee Error! - Coin Engineer","og_description":"Shortly after midnight UTC on April 8, a Bitcoin user mistakenly paid 0.75 BTC ($70,500) in transaction fees due to a panic-driven use of replace-by-fee (RBF). The transaction was the user\u2019s second attempt to push a prior transaction through by raising the fee and changing the destination address. In the final version, a newly added","og_url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/","og_site_name":"Coin Engineer","article_published_time":"2025-04-08T12:00:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-08T11:24:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/bitcoin-2.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Yigit Taha OZTURK","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Yigit Taha OZTURK","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/","url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/","name":"Panicked Bitcoiner Loses Over $70K in RBF Fee Error! - Coin Engineer","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/bitcoin-2.png","datePublished":"2025-04-08T12:00:20+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-08T11:24:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5b75ba41894c1164f25378c9022397fc"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/bitcoin-2.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/bitcoin-2.png","width":1920,"height":1080},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panicked-bitcoiner-loses-over-70k-in-rbf-fee-error\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Panicked Bitcoiner Loses Over $70K in RBF Fee Error!"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/","name":"Coin Engineer","description":"Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5b75ba41894c1164f25378c9022397fc","name":"Yigit Taha OZTURK","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3c58488c3e042b9f982e35ddee6f6e94f7d62613e8b36ebd312676655fab9908?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3c58488c3e042b9f982e35ddee6f6e94f7d62613e8b36ebd312676655fab9908?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Yigit Taha OZTURK"},"url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/author\/ceyigitt\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39862","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39862"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39862\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":39867,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39862\/revisions\/39867"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39865"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39862"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39862"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39862"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}