{"id":42589,"date":"2025-05-17T17:00:37","date_gmt":"2025-05-17T14:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/?p=42589"},"modified":"2025-05-17T17:05:52","modified_gmt":"2025-05-17T14:05:52","slug":"everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/","title":{"rendered":"Everstake: \u201cNon-Custodial Staking Is Not a Security, But a Technical Process\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"\" data-start=\"83\" data-end=\"364\"><strong>The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)<\/strong> held a meeting with <a href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/panama-city-mayor-hints-at-bitcoin-reserve-following-el-salvador-visit\/\"><strong>Everstake<\/strong><\/a>, one of the world\u2019s leading non-custodial staking providers, to clarify the regulatory status of staking activities in blockchain networks. The SEC\u2019s Crypto Task Force also took part in the discussion.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"366\" data-end=\"532\">With more than <strong data-start=\"381\" data-end=\"432\">$193 billion in digital assets currently staked<\/strong>, it remains uncertain in the U.S. whether staking services fall under the definition of securities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"534\" data-end=\"762\">The previous SEC administration had imposed sanctions on major exchanges such as Kraken, Coinbase, and Consensys due to their staking services. However, the current administration has withdrawn most of these enforcement actions.<\/p>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_71 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 eztoc-toggle-hide-by-default' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#Everstake_Users_Always_Maintain_Asset_Control\" title=\"Everstake: Users Always Maintain Asset Control\">Everstake: Users Always Maintain Asset Control<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#Regulatory_Uncertainty_Must_End\" title=\"Regulatory Uncertainty Must End\">Regulatory Uncertainty Must End<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#Non-Custodial_Staking_Does_Not_Pass_the_Howey_Test\" title=\"Non-Custodial Staking Does Not Pass the Howey Test\">Non-Custodial Staking Does Not Pass the Howey Test<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#Innovation_at_Risk_Without_Clarity\" title=\"Innovation at Risk Without Clarity\">Innovation at Risk Without Clarity<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 data-start=\"764\" data-end=\"814\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Everstake_Users_Always_Maintain_Asset_Control\"><\/span>Everstake: Users Always Maintain Asset Control<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"816\" data-end=\"1079\">During the meeting, Everstake stated that <strong data-start=\"858\" data-end=\"933\">non-custodial staking is a technical process, not an investment product<\/strong>. According to the company, users do not lose control of their assets during the staking process and do not transfer ownership to any third party.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"1081\" data-end=\"1264\">The company argued that this model does not technically involve an investment contract but is instead a <strong data-start=\"1185\" data-end=\"1224\">blockchain infrastructure mechanism<\/strong>. Company founder Sergii Vasylchuk said:<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"1266\" data-end=\"1429\">\u201cStaking is not a financial instrument or a securities transaction. It is a fundamental protocol mechanism that ensures the functioning of decentralized networks.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 data-start=\"1431\" data-end=\"1466\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Regulatory_Uncertainty_Must_End\"><\/span>Regulatory Uncertainty Must End<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"1468\" data-end=\"1656\">In a letter submitted to the SEC\u2019s Crypto Task Force on April 8, 2025, Everstake requested <strong data-start=\"1559\" data-end=\"1607\">regulatory clarity for non-custodial staking<\/strong>, as well as custodial and liquid staking models.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"1658\" data-end=\"1834\">The company emphasized that in this staking model, users retain custody of their assets, no funds are pooled, and there is no expectation of profit based on managerial efforts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"1836\" data-end=\"2025\">In Everstake\u2019s system, users delegate only validation rights, while <strong data-start=\"1904\" data-end=\"1934\">maintaining full ownership<\/strong> of their tokens. Rewards are distributed algorithmically by the blockchain network itself.<\/p>\n<h2 data-start=\"2027\" data-end=\"2081\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Non-Custodial_Staking_Does_Not_Pass_the_Howey_Test\"><\/span>Non-Custodial Staking Does Not Pass the Howey Test<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"2083\" data-end=\"2345\">The letter also highlighted that the staking process <strong data-start=\"2136\" data-end=\"2183\">does not meet any element of the Howey Test<\/strong>. Users do not invest in a common enterprise, do not expect profits from the company\u2019s efforts, and are not dependent on company management for financial results.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"2347\" data-end=\"2438\">Rewards stem solely from <strong data-start=\"2372\" data-end=\"2400\">network-level incentives<\/strong> and fluctuate with market conditions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"2440\" data-end=\"2550\">Everstake also proposed some core criteria for excluding non-custodial staking from securities classification:<\/p>\n<ul data-start=\"2552\" data-end=\"2665\">\n<li class=\"\" data-start=\"2552\" data-end=\"2574\">\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"2554\" data-end=\"2574\">User asset control<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li class=\"\" data-start=\"2575\" data-end=\"2594\">\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"2577\" data-end=\"2594\">No pooled funds<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li class=\"\" data-start=\"2595\" data-end=\"2624\">\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"2597\" data-end=\"2624\">Permissionless withdrawal<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li class=\"\" data-start=\"2625\" data-end=\"2665\">\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"2627\" data-end=\"2665\">Provision of technical services only<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"2667\" data-end=\"2809\">The company likens <strong data-start=\"2686\" data-end=\"2735\">non-custodial staking to proof-of-work mining<\/strong>, which the SEC has previously not classified as a securities transaction.<\/p>\n<h2 data-start=\"2811\" data-end=\"2849\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Innovation_at_Risk_Without_Clarity\"><\/span>Innovation at Risk Without Clarity<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"2851\" data-end=\"3137\">According to the company\u2019s Chief Legal Officer, Margaret Rosenfeld, there is no asset handover, investment contract, or third-party risk in the non-custodial staking process. Therefore, subjecting it to securities regulation could threaten the development of decentralized technologies:<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"3139\" data-end=\"3232\">\u201cTreating this model as a security would severely hinder innovation in the blockchain space.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"3234\" data-end=\"3435\">However, <strong data-start=\"3243\" data-end=\"3282\">no definitive regulatory commitment<\/strong> has been made by the SEC so far. Rosenfeld stated that while the agency did not provide any guarantees, it continues to listen to industry stakeholders.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p class=\"\" data-start=\"3234\" data-end=\"3435\"><em>Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don\u2019t forget to follow us on our\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/coinengineernews\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\"><strong>Telegram<\/strong>\u00a0 ,<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@CoinEngineer\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\"><strong>YouTube<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/coinengineers\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><strong>Twitter<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0channels for the latest\u00a0<a title=\"News\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/news\/\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"7\">news<\/a>\u00a0and updates.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) held a meeting with Everstake, one of the world\u2019s leading non-custodial staking providers, to clarify the regulatory status of staking activities in blockchain networks. The SEC\u2019s Crypto Task Force also took part in the discussion. With more than $193 billion in digital assets currently staked, it remains uncertain<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":42591,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,2],"tags":[12403,3859,39,1574],"class_list":["post-42589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-crypto-news","category-news","tag-crypto-task-force","tag-everstake","tag-sec","tag-staking"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Everstake: \u201cNon-Custodial Staking Is Not a Security, But a Technical Process\u201d - Coin Engineer<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Everstake: \u201cNon-Custodial Staking Is Not a Security, But a Technical Process\u201d - Coin Engineer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) held a meeting with Everstake, one of the world\u2019s leading non-custodial staking providers, to clarify the regulatory status of staking activities in blockchain networks. The SEC\u2019s Crypto Task Force also took part in the discussion. With more than $193 billion in digital assets currently staked, it remains uncertain\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Coin Engineer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-17T14:00:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-17T14:05:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/everstake_ce.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Emre Yumlu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Emre Yumlu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/\",\"name\":\"Everstake: \u201cNon-Custodial Staking Is Not a Security, But a Technical Process\u201d - Coin Engineer\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/everstake_ce.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-17T14:00:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-17T14:05:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f99e7d0d5039cb3b36bd759a12c1216c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/everstake_ce.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/everstake_ce.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Everstake: \u201cNon-Custodial Staking Is Not a Security, But a Technical Process\u201d\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Coin Engineer\",\"description\":\"Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f99e7d0d5039cb3b36bd759a12c1216c\",\"name\":\"Emre Yumlu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3618e7041e2880ae9fdfeec9b77592ba6e9417ff89cfe4db07e0d1687a477d7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3618e7041e2880ae9fdfeec9b77592ba6e9417ff89cfe4db07e0d1687a477d7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Emre Yumlu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/author\/ceemre\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Everstake: \u201cNon-Custodial Staking Is Not a Security, But a Technical Process\u201d - Coin Engineer","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Everstake: \u201cNon-Custodial Staking Is Not a Security, But a Technical Process\u201d - Coin Engineer","og_description":"The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) held a meeting with Everstake, one of the world\u2019s leading non-custodial staking providers, to clarify the regulatory status of staking activities in blockchain networks. The SEC\u2019s Crypto Task Force also took part in the discussion. With more than $193 billion in digital assets currently staked, it remains uncertain","og_url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/","og_site_name":"Coin Engineer","article_published_time":"2025-05-17T14:00:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-17T14:05:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/everstake_ce.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Emre Yumlu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Emre Yumlu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/","url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/","name":"Everstake: \u201cNon-Custodial Staking Is Not a Security, But a Technical Process\u201d - Coin Engineer","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/everstake_ce.jpg","datePublished":"2025-05-17T14:00:37+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-17T14:05:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f99e7d0d5039cb3b36bd759a12c1216c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/everstake_ce.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/everstake_ce.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/everstake-non-custodial-staking-is-not-a-security-but-a-technical-process\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Everstake: \u201cNon-Custodial Staking Is Not a Security, But a Technical Process\u201d"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/","name":"Coin Engineer","description":"Btc, Coins, Pre-Sale, DeFi, NFT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f99e7d0d5039cb3b36bd759a12c1216c","name":"Emre Yumlu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3618e7041e2880ae9fdfeec9b77592ba6e9417ff89cfe4db07e0d1687a477d7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3618e7041e2880ae9fdfeec9b77592ba6e9417ff89cfe4db07e0d1687a477d7b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Emre Yumlu"},"url":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/author\/ceemre\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42589"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42589\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42602,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42589\/revisions\/42602"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42591"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/coinengineer.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}