Emre Yumlu 
Bitcoin developers have taken a meaningful step to address the long-term risks posed by quantum computing. Proposal BIP 360 has been merged into the Bitcoin Improvement Proposals repository, formally entering the review phase. While this does not activate any changes to the network, it signals growing attention to quantum resilience and future-proofing Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundations.
What BIP 360 Proposes
BIP 360 introduces a new output type known as Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR). The proposal modifies how spending conditions are structured by disabling Taproot’s key-path spending mechanism, which was introduced in 2021. Under the current design, spending via the key path reveals the public key. In a world with sufficiently advanced, fault-tolerant quantum computers, that exposure could theoretically allow attackers to derive the corresponding private key.
Cryptographic researcher and BIP 360 co-author Ethan Heilman has emphasized that this specific feature creates a potential vulnerability in a quantum scenario. By removing the key-path spending option while maintaining Taproot’s upgrade flexibility, P2MR aims to eliminate the most quantum-sensitive component without sacrificing future extensibility. However, implementing such a change would require broad consensus and a future soft fork activation process.
How Close Is the Quantum Threat?
The urgency of the threat remains contested. Shor’s algorithm demonstrates that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically derive private keys from exposed public keys. Thomas Rosenbaum, president of Caltech, has suggested that functional, fault-tolerant quantum systems could emerge within five to seven years. Supporting this view, Caltech researchers have reportedly maintained coherence across more than 6,000 qubits with 99.98% accuracy, and IBM recently demonstrated a 120-qubit entangled system.
Despite these advances, Heilman cautions that long-term forecasting in quantum development is highly uncertain and considers a near-term cryptographic breakthrough unlikely. Similarly, Jameson Lopp, co-founder and chief security officer of Casa, argues that quantum hardware capable of threatening modern cryptography remains orders of magnitude away.
Technical Challenge or Governance Hurdle?
The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology has outlined post-quantum migration targets extending into the mid-2030s. For Bitcoin, however, technical readiness is only part of the equation. Activating a proposal typically requires roughly 95% sustained support among miners, node operators, businesses, and users. As decentralized protocols mature, achieving such consensus can become increasingly difficult.
While some industry participants view quantum risk as speculative, others believe that addressing existential threats proactively is essential to preserving Bitcoin’s long-term value. The timeline may be uncertain, but the groundwork for adaptation is already underway.
You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.