Global investors are now monitoring two key factors simultaneously: the Federal Reserve’s rate decision on Wednesday and growing energy risks around the Strait of Hormuz. At this point, market behavior is sitting on a particularly sensitive equilibrium.

Why Gold Prices Remain Stable

Gold has remained resilient despite waning expectations for rate cuts, supported by a weaker dollar and declining U.S. Treasury yields. These factors offset inflationary pressure from high energy prices, keeping gold above $5,000.

Earlier on Monday, gold experienced a roughly 1% drop. However, losses were quickly recovered as the dollar weakened. Spot gold rose 0.1% to $5,020 per ounce.

Meanwhile, April U.S. gold futures fell 0.7% to $5,024 per ounce, showing that the market is still searching for direction. The key driver here is actually a threefold balance: the dollar, Treasury yields, and energy prices.

When the dollar weakens, dollar-denominated commodities such as gold become cheaper for holders of other currencies, stimulating global demand.

Additionally, falling 10-year U.S. Treasury yields provide support for gold, as non-yielding assets like gold and silver become more attractive when yields decline.

Oil Remains Above $100

The Middle East conflict is directly affecting energy markets. As tensions between the U.S., Israel, and Iran enter the third week, oil remains above $100 per barrel.

This situation not only impacts energy markets but also affects global inflation expectations. High oil prices increase transportation and production costs, thereby strengthening inflationary pressure.

Gold is generally seen as a hedge against inflation. However, if inflation rises and central banks are forced to maintain high rates, real yields could increase, limiting gold’s upside.

According to OCBC strategist Christopher Wong, high energy prices may make the Fed more cautious about rate cuts. Essentially, the market is caught between two forces: geopolitical and inflation risks on one side, and the possibility of higher rates on the other.

Market Waiting Ahead of Fed Decision

The Federal Reserve’s two-day meeting concludes on Wednesday.

The market expects policy rates to remain unchanged, but investors are watching the Fed’s messaging closely.

If Fed officials signal that energy-driven inflation remains a concern, expectations for rate cuts could be further delayed.

Even if rates remain unchanged, changes in communication could swiftly shift market balance.

Meanwhile, the interplay of Treasury yields, the dollar index, and commodity prices is currently delicate. Small announcements can trigger significant price movements.

Strait of Hormuz Crisis and Energy Diplomacy

Geopolitical tensions remain high. Developments around the Strait of Hormuz are critical for global energy security.

U.S. President Donald Trump announced that his administration has held talks with seven countries to secure the Strait.

This move is not only military but also a signal of new energy diplomacy in the Gulf. Trump also threatened increased attacks on Iran’s main oil export terminal at Kharg Island, while stating that no peace agreement is currently on the table.

He emphasized that countries heavily reliant on Gulf oil bear responsibility for protecting the Strait.

This underscores that global energy supply is both an economic and security matter.

Other Precious Metals Gain

The cautious balance in gold has also extended to other precious metals.

Spot silver rose 0.1% to $80.62 per ounce. Platinum increased 1.8% to $2,060, while palladium climbed 1.6% to $1,576 per ounce.

Currently, the market is pricing three risk factors simultaneously: energy prices, geopolitical tensions, and Fed policy.

The coming days will reveal which direction this threefold equation pushes gold prices, as global market balance—risk premiums and real yields—is being recalculated in real time.

Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, please follow us on our Telegram, YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Gold Holds $5,000 as Oil Surges Above $100 Ahead of Fed appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Following the rally, Schiff shared his perspective on the market, arguing that the latest upward movement should not be interpreted as the beginning of a sustainable bullish trend.

Schiff Questions the Strength of the Rally

According to Peter Schiff, the recent rise in Bitcoin’s price does not signal a structural change in the market. Instead, he believes the move represents a temporary rebound within a broader downward trend.

Schiff described the price action as a classic “dead cat bounce,” a term often used in financial markets to refer to a short-lived recovery during a prolonged decline. In such situations, an asset may experience brief upward movements before continuing its broader downward trajectory.

From his perspective, investors should be cautious about interpreting these short-term rallies as evidence that a new bull market has begun.

Gold Versus Bitcoin Debate Continues

Schiff also used the opportunity to revisit his long-standing comparison between Bitcoin and gold. During the same period that Bitcoin experienced its price surge, gold prices reportedly saw a modest pullback.

This divergence may have influenced some investors to rotate capital from gold into Bitcoin. However, Schiff believes that this reaction could be a misinterpretation of market signals.

In his view, more experienced investors—often referred to as “smart money”—are approaching the situation differently. Schiff argued that these investors may be using Bitcoin’s upward moves as opportunities to sell, while treating temporary declines in gold as potential buying opportunities.

Comments on the U.S. Economic Outlook

Beyond cryptocurrency markets, Schiff also commented on the recent performance of the U.S. economy. He noted that the country’s economy grew by approximately 2.1% in 2025, which he considers weaker compared to the previous year.

For comparison, Schiff pointed out that economic growth in 2024 was reported at around 2.8%. Based on this difference, he argued that the more recent growth figures indicate a slowdown relative to the earlier period.

According to Schiff, shifts in macroeconomic performance can play an important role in shaping investor sentiment and financial market expectations.

Ongoing Debate in the Crypto Market

Bitcoin’s climb toward the $74,000 level has been interpreted by many market participants as a sign of resilience and potential recovery. Nevertheless, critics such as Schiff remain unconvinced that the rally reflects a lasting change in the market structure.

This ongoing divide highlights the broader debate surrounding Bitcoin’s role in global finance. While some investors view it as a long-term store of value, others continue to question its sustainability and treat rallies with caution.

Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, please follow us on our Telegram, YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Peter Schiff Says Rally of Bitcoin Is Just a “Dead Cat Bounce” appeared first on Coin Engineer.

According to Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, Bitcoin does not need to capture half of gold’s market value to reach a price of $1 million per coin. Instead, the key factor lies in the expansion of the broader global “store of value” market.

The Store-of-Value Market Is Expanding

Many investors assume that for Bitcoin to achieve a seven-figure price, it must directly rival gold and absorb a large portion of its existing market capitalization. Hougan believes this perspective overlooks an important dynamic: the store-of-value market itself is continuously growing.

Gold and other assets commonly used as stores of value have expanded significantly over the past two decades. In 2004, the global gold market was valued at roughly $2.5 trillion. Since then, it has grown at an average annual rate of around 13%, reaching approximately $38 trillion today.

Several structural factors have contributed to this expansion, including rising government debt levels, geopolitical uncertainty, accommodative monetary policies, and increasing concerns about long-term financial stability.

A $121 Trillion Market Within a Decade

If this growth trend continues, Hougan estimates that the total global store-of-value market could reach around $121 trillion within the next ten years.

Under such a scenario, Bitcoin would not need to dominate the market to reach $1 million per coin. Capturing just 17% of the global store-of-value market—roughly one-sixth of the total—could be sufficient to support that valuation.

This framework shifts the discussion away from direct competition with gold and instead highlights the overall expansion of wealth preservation assets worldwide.

Institutional Adoption Could Be a Major Catalyst

Institutional capital is expected to play a critical role in Bitcoin’s potential market share growth. Over the past several years, large financial institutions have gradually increased their exposure to digital assets.

Investment vehicles such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs), sovereign wealth funds, and professional asset managers allocating portions of diversified portfolios to Bitcoin could significantly accelerate adoption.

As these flows increase, Bitcoin’s role within the global financial system may continue to strengthen.

Hougan suggests that when these structural trends are considered, the idea of Bitcoin capturing a meaningful portion of the store-of-value market over the next decade does not appear unrealistic.

Bitcoin and Gold Are Currently Diverging

Despite frequent comparisons between Bitcoin and gold, the two assets have not moved in tandem in recent months.

Gold reached an all-time high of $5,600 per ounce in late January and currently remains only about 2.2% below that level. In contrast, Bitcoin is still trading roughly 44% below its peak recorded last October.

This divergence has fueled debate about whether Bitcoin truly behaves like a traditional safe-haven asset, despite its widely used “digital gold” narrative.

The Store-of-Value Narrative Remains Debated

Not all investors are convinced that Bitcoin can fully assume the role of a long-term store of value comparable to gold.

Billionaire investor Ray Dalio has previously expressed skepticism, arguing that gold remains a stronger safe-haven asset. One of his key points is that central banks continue to accumulate gold, while they have not shown the same level of demand for Bitcoin.

Dalio also suggests that Bitcoin’s market behavior often resembles that of technology stocks rather than a traditional defensive asset.

Similarly, some market research indicates that Bitcoin is not currently being priced as a hedge against macroeconomic risks such as inflation, sovereign debt concerns, or real interest rate fluctuations.

A Long-Term Scenario Still Under Discussion

The question of how large a share Bitcoin can ultimately capture within the global store-of-value market remains open. However, the continued expansion of that market combined with increasing institutional participation keeps the long-term bull case alive.

For this reason, some analysts believe that Bitcoin’s current valuation may still represent only an early phase in its long-term price discovery process, particularly if it continues to gain traction as a global wealth preservation asset.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Bitwise CIO: “If This Happens, Bitcoin Could Reach $1 Million” appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Rising Middle East Tensions Impact Energy Markets

Political rhetoric and military tensions in the Middle East have significantly increased pressure on global energy markets. U.S. President Donald Trump recently stated that any agreement with Iran would require “unconditional surrender,” a comment that further escalated regional tensions.

In response, statements from Iran’s Revolutionary Guard have drawn attention to the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global oil shipments. The possibility of disruptions in this narrow maritime corridor has raised concerns among market participants.

Reports indicate that tanker traffic in the region has slowed considerably. Visual data shared by Reuters suggests that more than 200 vessels have been waiting near the strait, with crossings occurring less frequently than usual. Such developments have heightened fears regarding potential interruptions to global oil supply.

Oil Prices Jump Sharply

Growing geopolitical risk has quickly translated into higher oil prices. Over the past 24 hours, oil has surged by 10.71 percent, reaching a price of 93.33 dollars per barrel.

The sharp increase is largely attributed to the strategic significance of the Strait of Hormuz. A large portion of the world’s oil exports passes through this corridor, meaning any disruption in the region could have a direct and immediate effect on global supply chains. As a result, traders are closely monitoring developments for signs of further escalation.

Precious Metals Gain from Safe-Haven Demand

Periods of geopolitical uncertainty typically drive investors toward assets perceived as stable stores of value. This dynamic has been clearly visible in precious metal markets.

Gold prices have risen by 1.77 percent in the past 24 hours, reaching 5,171 dollars.

Silver has also moved higher, gaining 2.68 percent and climbing to 84.44 dollars during the same period.

The continued upward momentum in these metals reflects heightened risk perception across financial markets, as investors look to hedge against instability and market volatility.

Weak U.S. Employment Data Adds Economic Concerns

Economic data from the United States has added another layer of uncertainty to global markets. The latest non-farm payroll report for February showed a decline of 92,000 jobs, significantly below the market expectation of 58,000. The previous reading had indicated job growth of 130,000.

Meanwhile, the unemployment rate increased slightly to 4.4 percent, compared with both the forecast and previous level of 4.3 percent.

The weaker-than-expected employment data has raised questions about the pace of economic growth in the United States and has contributed to a more cautious tone among investors.

The Financial Cost of the Iran Conflict

Beyond market reactions, the potential economic burden of military operations involving Iran is also drawing attention. While the Pentagon has not released an official estimate, analysis from a Washington-based policy institute suggests that the daily cost of the operation could reach approximately 891.4 million dollars.

According to the same analysis, the total cost could climb to as much as 95 billion dollars depending on how long the operation continues. Current projections mentioned by U.S. officials range from two weeks to six weeks, though the exact timeline remains uncertain.

As geopolitical tensions persist, global investors continue to watch both political developments and economic indicators closely. These factors are expected to remain key drivers of commodity prices, particularly in the energy and precious metals sectors.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Gold and Silver Continue to Rise: Oil Cannot Be Stopped! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

According to her analysis, the divergence in market sentiment between the two assets could create conditions where Bitcoin eventually outperforms gold.

A Shifting Dynamic Between Bitcoin and Gold

Alden points out that market behavior between Bitcoin and gold often follows a cyclical pattern. Periods of strong performance in one asset can eventually be followed by renewed momentum in the other. From her perspective, the current environment suggests that Bitcoin may be positioned to regain strength after gold’s recent surge.

Looking at the next two to three years, Alden believes the probability of Bitcoin outperforming gold in terms of price appreciation is relatively high. If she were forced to choose between the two assets under current conditions, she says she would lean toward Bitcoin.

Strong Optimism Surrounding Gold

Gold prices have recently reached new highs, climbing to approximately $5,608 in January. This sharp increase has significantly boosted investor interest in the precious metal.

However, Alden does not characterize the current situation as a speculative bubble. Instead, she describes it as a period of strong optimism among market participants. Several sentiment indicators support this view. One index measuring investor mood in the gold market recently reached 72 out of 100, placing it firmly within the “greed” territory.

Such readings suggest that investors are currently very bullish on gold.

Cautious Sentiment in the Bitcoin Market

In contrast, sentiment toward Bitcoin appears considerably more conservative. Indicators tracking market psychology in the cryptocurrency sector recently signaled “extreme fear,” reflecting a more defensive attitude among investors.

Bitcoin is currently trading around $71,000, which is roughly 44% below its all-time high of $126,000 recorded in October. Alden suggests that this gap between price levels and investor sentiment could indicate that the market is overly pessimistic about Bitcoin’s prospects.

Bitcoin and Gold Do Not Always Move Together

Bitcoin is frequently compared with gold as a hedge against inflation and economic uncertainty. Because of this narrative, many investors refer to Bitcoin as “digital gold.”

However, Alden stresses that the relationship between the two assets is not always consistent. There are periods when Bitcoin and gold rise together, but there are also times when their price movements diverge significantly.

For this reason, she cautions against relying too heavily on a fixed narrative when evaluating the interaction between the two markets.

Diverging Views on Bitcoin’s Long-Term Role

Not all investors agree on Bitcoin’s role as a safe-haven asset. Some critics argue that gold maintains a stronger position because it is widely held by central banks as part of their reserve portfolios, giving it a long-established status in the global financial system.

At the same time, many analysts within the cryptocurrency industry believe the connection between Bitcoin and gold is gradually strengthening. In periods of macroeconomic uncertainty, both assets are increasingly viewed as alternative stores of value, reinforcing their roles in diversified portfolios.

Also, in the comment section, you can freely share your comments and opinions about the topic. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on Telegram, YouTube and Twitter for the latest news and updates.

The post Senior Analyst: Bitcoin Could Outperform Gold Within 2–3 Years appeared first on Coin Engineer.

These financial instruments, which facilitate institutional investors’ access to crypto assets, have witnessed massive fund inflows especially after their approval in the United States. Spot ETFs have become a significant alternative for investors who do not want to invest directly in Bitcoin or prefer to take positions through regulated financial products.

Striking Comparison Between Bitcoin and Gold ETFs

In the chart below, the cumulative capital inflows collected by spot Bitcoin ETFs since their launch are compared with the fund flows gold ETFs achieved over the years.

In the chart, the orange line represents the cumulative inflows directed to spot Bitcoin ETFs, while the yellow line shows the capital accumulation of gold ETFs over time. The striking point is that Bitcoin ETFs managed to attract around $50–60 billion in capital in just about two years. In contrast, it took gold ETFs a much longer time period to reach similar levels.

The gold ETFs chart shows a fluctuating but generally upward trend over the years. Fund inflows into gold particularly accelerated during global crisis periods and times of heightened inflation concerns. In Bitcoin ETFs, however, there is a strong and highly concentrated demand in a much shorter timeframe.

Institutional Demand and a New Asset Class

This rapid capital inflow into spot Bitcoin ETFs demonstrates that digital assets are increasingly being accepted by a broader investor base. Comparing Bitcoin — long considered a safe haven in traditional finance — with gold is leading to more discussion about Bitcoin as an alternative store of value.

At the same time, the performance of Bitcoin ETFs is regarded not only as an indicator of investor interest but also as evidence of a structural transformation in financial markets. The entry of major asset management firms into this space stands out as a key factor accelerating the institutionalization of the crypto market.

A New Era for Financial Markets

The capital scale that spot Bitcoin ETFs have reached in such a short time shows that digital assets have reached a level where they can compete with traditional financial products. This rapid growth observed in the ETF market signals that the role of crypto assets within the financial system could expand even further in the future.

In the coming period, both regulatory developments and institutional investor demand will be among the most important factors determining the growth rate of Bitcoin ETFs. However, the current picture clearly demonstrates that digital assets have begun to establish a permanent place in the financial world.

*This content does not constitute investment advice.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Bitcoin Has Accumulated in 2 Years What Gold ETFs Accumulated in 15 Years! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Gold: A Historical and Central Bank Preference

Dalio stressed that gold serves as a long-term store of value. Unlike purely speculative assets, gold has historically played a strategic role in central banks’ reserves. Dalio pointed out that past efforts to address economic problems by printing money are no longer as effective, making gold’s limited supply and irreplaceable nature a critical factor in maintaining its value over time.

“You cannot print gold at will,” Dalio noted, emphasizing that central banks acquire gold deliberately to safeguard their positions amid global economic uncertainty. Gold’s stability, he argued, clearly separates it from traditional currency and underscores its role as a reliable reserve asset.

Why Bitcoin Differs from Gold

Dalio argued that comparing Bitcoin to gold is misleading. Gold’s uniqueness comes from being a singular, finite resource. In contrast, Bitcoin, as a digital asset, behaves more like technology stocks, with price dynamics heavily influenced by market sentiment and innovation cycles. Dalio also highlighted potential privacy concerns with Bitcoin, noting that its fully transparent nature differentiates it from gold in a meaningful way.

Additionally, Dalio mentioned that advances in quantum computing could pose a theoretical risk to Bitcoin. Central banks, he believes, are unlikely to adopt Bitcoin as a reserve asset in the same manner as gold, further distancing it from the “digital gold” narrative.

Global Shifts and Geopolitical Change

Dalio also reflected on the evolving global order. He observed that U.S.-led dominance is weakening and older powers are giving way to emerging players, signaling a period of geopolitical transformation. Investors, Dalio suggests, need to recognize these structural changes when considering the relative security of assets like gold versus the speculative nature of Bitcoin.

The takeaway is clear: while gold continues to serve as a historically proven safe haven, Bitcoin remains a volatile, technology-driven investment, better understood as part of the broader risk portfolio rather than a direct substitute for gold.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Ray Dalio: Bitcoin Is Not Gold appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Why Is the Strait of Hormuz Critical for the Global Economy?

At the center of the crisis lies the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial chokepoint for global energy supply. Approximately 21% of daily global oil trade passes through this narrow waterway. Any disruption in the region has the potential to create serious consequences not only regionally but also for the global economy. Sudden fluctuations in energy markets could impact global inflation and economic stability through rising oil prices. According to Butterfill, the withdrawal of maritime insurance coverage and increased tanker activity indicate that the crisis is moving beyond political rhetoric and that markets have begun pricing in real risks. Additionally, the reemergence of actors such as Hezbollah and the Houthis has heightened concerns that tensions could spread into a broader conflict. This situation raises global risk perception and may lead investors to take more cautious positions.

Oil and Gold Moved, Bitcoin Reacted Differently

As geopolitical risks increased, oil prices rose by approximately 13%, while gold prices declined by 1.8%. However, according to Butterfill, the most notable move occurred in Bitcoin. Since Bitcoin is one of the few major liquid assets that can be traded on weekends, it is considered an important indicator for understanding market behavior during crises. In past geopolitical events, Bitcoin typically behaved like a risk asset, absorbing selling pressure during investor flight-to-safety phases. This time, however, a different picture emerged. As global uncertainty increased, Bitcoin’s price moved higher. This suggests that instead of panic-selling, some investors redirected capital into digital assets. Butterfill argues that this indicates a growing perception among certain investors that Bitcoin may serve as an alternative store of value. Especially during periods of rising uncertainty in traditional markets, Bitcoin’s reaction has reignited debates about the role of digital assets in the global financial system.

Technical Indicators and Market Positioning

According to the analysis, Bitcoin’s current resilience may also be linked to market positioning ahead of the crisis. Over the past five months, large investors are estimated to have sold approximately $30 billion worth of Bitcoin, significantly reducing supply pressure in the market.

During the same period, several key technical indicators approached bottom levels:

• The MVRV ratio fell roughly one standard deviation below realized value.
• The RSI dropped to 16, entering deep oversold territory.
• The leverage ratio declined from 33% in October 2025 to 25%, returning to its long-term average.

Butterfill suggests these figures indicate that the Bitcoin market had already largely completed its correction phase before the geopolitical shock occurred.

ETF Flows Show Growing Preference for Bitcoin

One of the most important indicators supporting market behavior has been ETF flows. Bitcoin ETFs had experienced cumulative outflows of $4.3 billion over five consecutive weeks. However, last week the trend reversed, with approximately $683 million in net inflows. According to Butterfill, these figures suggest that instead of exiting the market amid uncertainty, investors have begun reallocating capital into Bitcoin. Meanwhile, U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) data came in above expectations, rising 0.5% monthly, while the core figure measured 0.8%. Continued increases in energy prices due to tensions involving Iran signal mounting global inflationary pressure. This development also affects interest rate expectations. Futures markets show that the probability of a rate cut in June has fallen below 50%. Butterfill notes that a high-interest-rate environment may create short-term pressure on non-yielding assets like Bitcoin. However, as tensions between energy-driven inflation and confidence in central banks intensify, Bitcoin’s attractiveness could increase.

Evaluation

Geopolitical tensions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz pose significant risks to the global financial system. A surge in energy prices, supply chain disruptions, and broader economic strain could drive investors toward alternative assets. According to CoinShares, short-term consolidation and limited downside risk may persist for Bitcoin. However, the normalization of leverage ratios, reduced selling pressure from large investors, and million-dollar ETF inflows during rising geopolitical risk suggest that Bitcoin is increasingly behaving like a maturing “safe-haven” asset.

Butterfill summarizes the situation as follows:

“The Iran crisis did not establish Bitcoin’s safe-haven thesis, but it has provided the strongest real-world test of this cycle so far.”

According to the analyst, market movements over the past 72 hours indicate that Bitcoin has, for now, passed that test successfully.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post How Is the Strait of Hormuz Crisis Affecting Bitcoin? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Gold Rebounds on Safe-Haven Demand

With uncertainty mounting, gold has regained upward momentum. Spot gold advanced 1.3% to $5,161.5 per ounce, while U.S. April gold futures rose 0.8%, trading at $5,165.80 per ounce. The recovery comes after a sharp pullback the previous session, when the metal fell more than 4% amid a stronger U.S. dollar and fading expectations of near-term rate cuts.

The latest rebound marks a recovery from the lowest levels seen in a week. Despite recent volatility, the broader structural drivers behind gold remain intact. Persistent geopolitical uncertainty, policy unpredictability, and the need for portfolio diversification continue to underpin medium-term support for the metal.

Energy Markets React to Supply Concerns

Tensions involving the United States, Israel, and Iran have intensified concerns over potential disruptions to energy supply. Actions targeting energy infrastructure and maritime activity in the Gulf region have heightened fears of reduced output across a corridor stretching from Qatar to Iraq. As a result, both oil and natural gas prices have experienced sharp upward moves.

Market analysts caution that sustained increases in energy prices could reintroduce inflationary pressures at a delicate time for global monetary policy. Rising oil prices in particular may complicate central banks’ efforts to transition toward looser financial conditions.

Inflation Expectations and Rate Outlook

Elevated energy costs combined with geopolitical instability have pushed inflation expectations back into focus. Market participants widely anticipate that the U.S. Federal Reserve will keep interest rates unchanged at its March 18 meeting.

Broader Precious Metals Performance

The upward move in gold has been mirrored by gains across the broader precious metals complex. Spot silver surged 3.1% to $84.61 per ounce, while platinum rose 2.1% to $2,126.50 per ounce. Palladium was trading at $1,673.38 per ounce.

Overall, the market response underscores a clear shift toward defensive assets as geopolitical risks intensify and macroeconomic uncertainty remains elevated.

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

You can join our Telegram channel to not miss the news and stay informed about the crypto world.

The post Gold, Silver and Oil Climb Again! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Gold, Silver, and Oil on the Rise!

As of Tuesday, commodity prices such as gold, silver, and oil continued their upward trend for the fifth consecutive trading day. The primary concern in the markets is the possibility that the current tension could evolve from a short-term conflict into a broader, more protracted regional crisis. This scenario suppresses risk appetite while increasing demand for safe-haven assets.

Strait of Hormuz Tension and Oil Risk

One of the headlines escalating the tension involves statements regarding the Strait of Hormuz. Reports in Iranian media quoted a senior official from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) stating that the strait has been closed and that vessels attempting to pass could face intervention. The Strait of Hormuz is a strategically critical chokepoint, as approximately one-fifth of global oil supply passes through it.

These statements have heightened upward risks for oil prices, while also raising concerns that potential supply disruptions could reignite inflationary pressures. However, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) stated that the strait is not actually closed and that there are no indications of active Iranian patrolling or mining efforts in the area. China, meanwhile, called on all parties to protect ship safety in the strait.

Current Prices of Gold, Silver, and Oil

In the current environment, gold’s spot price per ounce stands at around $5,320.

Silver is at $86.93,

And crude oil is trading around $80.68.

(Note: These are approximate levels cited in the original analysis; real-time prices as of early March 2026 show gold fluctuating in the $5,300–$5,400 range, silver around $85–$93, and crude oil in the $70–$80+ range depending on the benchmark (WTI/Brent), reflecting ongoing volatility from geopolitical developments.)

These price levels demonstrate that the geopolitical risk premium is strongly reflected in the markets.

In the short term, as long as uncertainty and military tensions persist, safe-haven demand for gold and silver could remain intact. On the oil side, the supply risk stemming from the Strait of Hormuz continues to be the main factor keeping prices elevated.

However, if diplomatic contacts increase, tensions de-escalate, or a ceasefire/agreement framework emerges between the parties, profit-taking and corrective moves could be seen, especially in precious metals. Oil prices could also retreat if the supply risk diminishes.

The main factor determining the direction in commodity markets will be the course of military developments and the global actors’ capacity to manage the crisis. As long as the risk premium remains high, the upward trend may persist; but if uncertainty decreases, pricing could settle on a more balanced footing.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Will Gold, Silver, and Oil Continue Their Rise? appeared first on Coin Engineer.