Edwards also pointed out a common mistake among investors: the constant attempt to perfectly identify the market bottom. In his view, Bitcoin’s present price structure indicates that the asset is positioned closer to long-term support areas than to previous market peaks, suggesting that valuations may already reflect a significant portion of downside risk.

A Key Valuation Range for Bitcoin

One of the analytical frameworks Edwards highlighted involves Bitcoin’s production cost model. This model evaluates the cost of mining Bitcoin and uses it as a benchmark for understanding long-term value.

Based on this approach, Edwards noted that the $50,000 to $60,000 range represents a meaningful value zone for Bitcoin. Historically, mining costs have often aligned with key support levels in the market, making them a useful indicator when evaluating price floors.

While these levels do not guarantee immediate upside, they may indicate that Bitcoin is trading within a historically attractive valuation band relative to its underlying production economics.

Quantum Computing Concerns

A particularly notable part of Edwards’ discussion focused on the potential implications of quantum computing for Bitcoin’s long-term security model. He argued that the topic has not yet received the level of attention it may deserve within the Bitcoin development community.

According to Edwards, some institutional investors have already expressed caution regarding this technological uncertainty. The possibility that future quantum computing breakthroughs could challenge existing cryptographic standards has led certain market participants to limit or reconsider their Bitcoin allocations.

He suggested that until the ecosystem begins implementing clear quantum-resistant solutions, the uncertainty could act as a psychological barrier preventing Bitcoin from reaching new all-time highs.

The Role of Macro Liquidity

Edwards also emphasized that macroeconomic conditions remain a major driver of cryptocurrency markets. In particular, potential interest rate cuts in the United States and expansionary fiscal policies could provide supportive conditions for risk assets.

Such an environment could improve liquidity across financial markets, which historically has benefited assets like Bitcoin.

However, Edwards cautioned that rising energy prices could complicate this outlook. If oil prices were to climb above $100 per barrel, it could introduce additional pressure on global equity markets and potentially affect broader risk sentiment.

The Debate Around Bitcoin Treasury Companies

Another topic raised during the discussion involved the growing number of publicly traded companies holding Bitcoin on their balance sheets. Edwards believes that the increasing presence of these so-called “Bitcoin treasury companies” may not be sustainable over the long term.

He suggested that many of these firms could eventually consolidate or disappear as market dynamics evolve. Companies that have adopted debt-financed Bitcoin accumulation strategies may also need to adapt their business models in the future, potentially expanding into financial services or lending activities to remain viable.

Also, you can freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, please follow us on our Telegram, YouTube and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Analyst: “New ATHs Difficult Until This Bitcoin Risk is Resolved” appeared first on Coin Engineer.

However, the key question for investors remains the same: When could the downturn finally end?

According to market experts, the next recovery in crypto is unlikely to be triggered by a single dramatic event. Instead, it may emerge gradually as several important developments begin to restore confidence across the industry.

1. Regulatory Clarity Through the CLARITY Act

One of the most important developments being watched in the United States is the CLARITY Act, a major legislative proposal aimed at defining how digital assets should be regulated. While other pro-crypto policies have appeared in recent years, this bill is expected to play a decisive role in shaping the regulatory framework.

If the legislation moves forward, it could provide clearer oversight rules for digital assets and encourage banks, asset managers, and payment companies to increase their involvement in the crypto sector. Greater institutional participation could significantly boost market confidence.

2. Improvement in the Macro and Tech Market Environment

Cryptocurrencies remain highly correlated with technology stocks and broader risk assets. When tech markets weaken, crypto often experiences amplified volatility.

For instance, the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index is still down more than 2% year-to-date, reflecting ongoing pressure in the sector. Because of this correlation, many analysts believe that a sustained crypto rally may only begin once the broader macro environment stabilizes and risk appetite returns.

3. Institutional ETF Inflows Returning

Institutional demand has become one of the most influential forces in the crypto market. During 2024 and 2025, strong inflows into Bitcoin ETFs absorbed a substantial portion of market supply.

Recently, however, ETF outflows coincided with the broader market decline. If institutional investors begin allocating capital to these products again, it could signal that Bitcoin prices are once again considered attractive long-term entry points.

4. A New Narrative: Agentic Finance

Another potential catalyst lies in the emergence of new technological narratives. One concept gaining attention is “agentic finance,” which refers to AI-driven software agents capable of autonomously executing financial transactions and managing assets on blockchain networks.

Although the idea is still in its early stages, increasing interest from technology and payment companies could expand blockchain’s real-world use cases.

5. Progress on Quantum-Resistant Security

Concerns about the future impact of quantum computing on blockchain security occasionally resurface in the crypto community. While the threat remains largely theoretical, developers are exploring quantum-resistant cryptographic solutions.

Even incremental progress in this area could help reassure investors worried about long-term infrastructure risks.

6. A More Mature Market Structure

Unlike previous crypto bear markets, the current downturn has not been defined by widespread industry collapses. In earlier cycles—particularly in 2022—major corporate failures triggered cascading crises.

Today, the market appears structurally stronger, with improved infrastructure, greater institutional participation, and relatively lower volatility. These factors could make crypto markets more attractive for long-term investors.

A Gradual Turn Rather Than a Sudden Reversal

Experts emphasize that the next crypto bull cycle may not begin with a single headline event. Instead, recovery could unfold gradually as multiple positive developments accumulate over time.

If these catalysts begin aligning, the end of the current bear market may arrive quietly—driven by growing confidence rather than sudden speculation.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post When Could the 2026 Crypto Bear Market End? 6 Key Catalysts appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Speaking on a recent podcast appearance, Corallo stated that attributing Bitcoin’s current weakness to quantum threats is misguided. In his view, if investors were genuinely repricing crypto assets due to imminent quantum risks, the impact would not be isolated to Bitcoin alone.

Bitcoin Has Fallen 46% From Its Peak

Corallo highlighted Ethereum as a key comparison. If quantum-related vulnerabilities were the dominant concern, Ether should be significantly outperforming Bitcoin. Instead, Ether has fallen 58% since the major crypto market downturn in October and was trading around $1,957 at the time referenced.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin declined from its October all-time high of $126,100 to approximately $67,162, representing a 46% pullback. While the correction has been substantial, Corallo argues that price action across major digital assets does not support the idea that quantum computing fears are driving the sell-off.

Long-Term Risk, Not Immediate Threat

The debate intensified after some community members suggested that Bitcoin developers have been too slow in preparing the network for a quantum-resistant future. In contrast, the Ethereum Foundation recently included long-term post-quantum readiness in a broader protocol security update.

Corallo acknowledged that quantum computing presents a theoretical long-term risk. However, he emphasized that market makers do not appear to view it as an urgent, short-term threat. According to him, parts of the Bitcoin community may simply be searching for a clear cause to explain the asset’s underperformance.

Capital Competition in a New Era for Bitcoin

Instead of quantum risk, Corallo suggested a structural shift in capital allocation as a more plausible explanation. He noted that Bitcoin is now competing for investment flows in ways it previously did not, particularly against capital-intensive sectors such as artificial intelligence.

AI-related investments, he argued, represent a massive and rapidly expanding asset class. Traditional equity markets are pricing in significant value creation tied to AI, which may be drawing capital away from digital assets.

Diverging Opinions Remain

Not everyone agrees with Corallo’s assessment. Capriole Investments founder Charles Edwards has argued that quantum risk should be reflected in Bitcoin’s valuation until the issue is definitively addressed. Entrepreneur Kevin O’Leary, on the other hand, has suggested that quantum computing resources would likely be more effectively deployed in areas like medical research rather than attempting to break Bitcoin.

Additionally, BlackRock updated the registration statement for its iShares Bitcoin ETF to warn investors about potential risks quantum computing could pose to the integrity of the Bitcoin network.

Click here to get the latest news from Coin Engineer! 

The post Bitcoin Developer: Quantum Isn’t the Reason for the Drop! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

What BIP 360 Proposes

BIP 360 introduces a new output type known as Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR). The proposal modifies how spending conditions are structured by disabling Taproot’s key-path spending mechanism, which was introduced in 2021. Under the current design, spending via the key path reveals the public key. In a world with sufficiently advanced, fault-tolerant quantum computers, that exposure could theoretically allow attackers to derive the corresponding private key.

Cryptographic researcher and BIP 360 co-author Ethan Heilman has emphasized that this specific feature creates a potential vulnerability in a quantum scenario. By removing the key-path spending option while maintaining Taproot’s upgrade flexibility, P2MR aims to eliminate the most quantum-sensitive component without sacrificing future extensibility. However, implementing such a change would require broad consensus and a future soft fork activation process.

How Close Is the Quantum Threat?

The urgency of the threat remains contested. Shor’s algorithm demonstrates that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically derive private keys from exposed public keys. Thomas Rosenbaum, president of Caltech, has suggested that functional, fault-tolerant quantum systems could emerge within five to seven years. Supporting this view, Caltech researchers have reportedly maintained coherence across more than 6,000 qubits with 99.98% accuracy, and IBM recently demonstrated a 120-qubit entangled system.

Despite these advances, Heilman cautions that long-term forecasting in quantum development is highly uncertain and considers a near-term cryptographic breakthrough unlikely. Similarly, Jameson Lopp, co-founder and chief security officer of Casa, argues that quantum hardware capable of threatening modern cryptography remains orders of magnitude away.

Technical Challenge or Governance Hurdle?

The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology has outlined post-quantum migration targets extending into the mid-2030s. For Bitcoin, however, technical readiness is only part of the equation. Activating a proposal typically requires roughly 95% sustained support among miners, node operators, businesses, and users. As decentralized protocols mature, achieving such consensus can become increasingly difficult.

While some industry participants view quantum risk as speculative, others believe that addressing existential threats proactively is essential to preserving Bitcoin’s long-term value. The timeline may be uncertain, but the groundwork for adaptation is already underway.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Bitcoin Developers Move Toward a Post-Quantum Future appeared first on Coin Engineer.

What Does Quranium (QRN) Offer?

The majority of existing Layer-1 networks use ECDSA-based cryptography. The increasing computational power and the development of quantum computers have raised serious concerns that these signature algorithms could become breakable in the long term. Quranium claims to be the first Layer-1 blockchain built from the ground up on a quantum-resistant architecture, placing this risk at its core.

The project aims to create an infrastructure that ensures the long-term security (10–30 years and beyond) of financial assets, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), digital identities, and data requiring long-term storage.

The Quantum Threat and the “Store Now, Decrypt Later” Risk

Blockchain security today largely relies on elliptic curve cryptography (ECDSA). However, the theoretical ability of quantum computers to break these systems poses a structural risk to digital asset security.

The scenario known as “Store Now, Decrypt Later” refers to the possibility of encrypted data being stored today and decrypted in the future with more powerful computers. This means that current smart contracts and wallet infrastructures may not remain secure in the long term.

Quranium treats this threat not merely as a theoretical risk, but as an inevitable future security problem, and positions its infrastructure accordingly.

SLH-DSA: Hash-Based Post-Quantum Signature Algorithm

The technical foundation of Quranium is SLH-DSA (Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Algorithm). This algorithm is based on hash-based cryptography and offers a stateless structure.

Hash-based cryptography is considered one of the longest-tested and most conservative security-assumption methods in the cryptography world. It is stated to provide a more cautious and long-term security perspective compared to lattice-based alternatives.

Quranium’s approach can be summarized as follows:

• A more robust architecture compared to stateful structures
• A more conservative security approach than lattice-based systems
• A cryptographic foundation that will remain valid for decades

This structure is specifically designed for banks, regulated financial institutions, and assets requiring long-term storage.

EVM-Compatible Quantum-Safe Infrastructure

Quranium is not only a new Layer-1; it also offers an EVM-compatible architecture. This allows developers to deploy their existing Solidity-based smart contracts on the Quranium network without rewriting them.

This feature enables projects to transition to a quantum-resistant foundation without requiring a complete rebuild. Thus, the goal is to achieve a balanced transition between performance, developer experience, and security.

QxSwap: Quantum-Safe Decentralized Exchange

QxSwap is a quantum-secure decentralized exchange (DEX) positioned within the Quranium ecosystem. It is designed for institutional-grade asset exchange.

Key features:

• High-speed asset swapping
• Quantum-resistant signature infrastructure
• Scalable liquidity in global markets

This structure specifically targets institutional actors conducting large-volume transactions.

QRemix AI: AI-Powered Smart Contract Deployment

QRemix AI is an artificial intelligence-based tool aimed at accelerating smart contract development and deployment processes.

Through this system, developers are expected to optimize contract creation and deployment processes, reduce potential errors, and achieve faster prototyping.

The combination of quantum-safe infrastructure with AI-supported development tools lies at the center of Quranium’s technology vision.

QSafe Wallet: Quantum-Safe Wallet

QSafe Wallet is Quranium’s native and quantum-secure wallet solution.

Key features:

• Support for Quranium mainnet tokens and NFTs
• Integration with over 70 major blockchains (including BTC, Ethereum, Solana)
• Quantum-resistant signature infrastructure

This structure aims to combine multi-chain asset management with a post-quantum security perspective.

Qinfi: Quantum-Safe SuperApp

Qinfi is the application developed by Quranium and described as “the world’s first quantum-safe SuperApp.”

It aims to offer the following functions within a single application:

• Ownership of tokenized real-world assets
• Instant transfers between bank accounts and crypto wallets
• Investment or trading in crypto and stocks
• Earning yield from assets
• One-tap borrowing
• Payments with a crypto-backed card

All these operations are protected with quantum-resistant encryption infrastructure.

Institutional Focus and Regulatory Perspective

Quranium’s positioning is directed more toward institutional participants than individual users.

Key institutional advantages:

Long-Term Validity Regulated assets (securities, health data, intellectual property) require validity periods of 10–30 years and beyond. SLH-DSA hash-based signatures provide conservative security suitable for this requirement.

Auditability and Compliance Simpler cryptographic primitives mean easier auditability. Hash functions are among the most thoroughly tested building blocks in cryptography history.

Security-Performance Balance While lattice-based systems offer current speed advantages, they involve more assumptions regarding long-term security. Quranium prioritizes security in the balance between performance and long-term assurance.

Quranium (QRN) Roadmap

H1 2026

• TGE and exchange listings
• Agentic AI Whitepaper announcement
• Mainnet upgrade: Post-quantum financial infrastructure (banking, payments, remittance)
• Stablecoin integration
• Post-quantum P2P communication protocol
• QIP Community Governance Portal launch

H2 2027

• Mainnet upgrade: Post-quantum AI communication infrastructure
• Launch of Agentic AI verification protocol
• Completion of the first institutional bank’s PoC integration

Quranium (QRN) Investors

Quranium has received investments in the early stage from both accelerator programs and venture-backed companies. Through strategic investors, the project aims to enhance both its technical and institutional growth capacity.

• Animoca Brands
• 5Tech Lab

Quranium (QRN) Team

The Quranium team consists of experienced founders and executives in blockchain, finance, and technology fields. The project’s technical, operational, and strategic vision is shaped by this team.

• Kapil Dhiman – Co-Founder & CEO
• Yaduvenda Yadav – Co-Founder & CTO
• Zeeshan Khan – Co-Founder & COO
• Mohit Kapadia – CPO
• Maz Zaman – CGO
• Olivia Karlsson – Chief of Staff to CEO

Advisors

• Muhammad Al Saiyari – Advisor
• Michael Terpin – Advisor
• James Bernad – Advisor
• Sebastien Borget – Advisor
• John Keith King – Advisor

Official Links

• Website
• X (Twitter)
• Whitepaper

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post What is Quranium (QRN)? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

While some market participants view quantum risk as a growing overhang, several prominent voices within the Bitcoin ecosystem argue that the explanation is overly simplistic and distracts from more immediate market dynamics.

Glassnode: Long-Term Holder Selling Is the Real Driver

Glassnode lead analyst James Check has pushed back against the narrative that quantum computing fears are responsible for Bitcoin’s recent weakness. According to Check, attributing price movements to abstract technological threats ignores observable on-chain behavior.

Check points to sustained sell-side pressure from long-term Bitcoin holders as the dominant factor behind price stagnation. He notes that throughout 2025, HODLers distributed Bitcoin at levels that would have prematurely ended prior bull markets multiple times over.

From this perspective, quantum computing may be influencing sentiment at the margins, but it is not the primary force shaping near-term price action.

Why Quantum Computing Has Reentered the Spotlight

Quantum computing differs fundamentally from classical computing by using qubits, which can process information in parallel states. In theory, sufficiently advanced quantum machines could compromise certain cryptographic algorithms, a concern that has been debated within blockchain research circles for years.

What has changed recently is the growing attention from traditional finance. Several high-profile executives and strategists have begun openly questioning whether advances in quantum computing could pose a long-term security risk to Bitcoin.

One notable example is Jefferies strategist Christopher Wood, who recently removed Bitcoin from his “Greed & Fear” model portfolio. His decision was partially driven by concerns that accelerating progress in quantum technology could undermine Bitcoin’s long-term investment case.

A Divided Bitcoin Community

There is no consensus within the Bitcoin community on how seriously the quantum narrative should be taken today.

Bitcoin author Vijay Boyapati has expressed strong skepticism, arguing that current price behavior cannot be credibly explained by quantum computing concerns. In his view, the narrative has gained traction in select investment commentary but lacks grounding in market fundamentals.

In contrast, Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter takes a far more assertive stance. Carter has argued that Bitcoin’s unexpected underperformance is largely attributable to quantum risk, calling it the defining issue for the market this year. He has warned that developers may be underestimating the urgency of the problem.

“Risk Expands With Time, Not Price”

Adding a structural layer to the debate, Real Vision’s chief crypto researcher Jamie Coutts emphasizes that quantum risk does not correlate directly with short-term price movements.

According to Coutts, rising prices tend to increase confidence across the ecosystem, reducing the perceived need for disruptive precautionary upgrades. Ironically, this creates a situation where the system feels safest precisely when incentives to prepare for long-term threats are weakest.

From this viewpoint, the danger lies less in immediate market impact and more in delayed adaptation.

Bitcoin’s Performance Fell Short of Expectations

Against this backdrop, Bitcoin’s 2025 performance failed to meet the most optimistic forecasts. The year began with Bitcoin trading near $93,400, but it closed approximately 6.3% lower around $87,500.

While some projections had envisioned prices reaching $250,000, Bitcoin peaked slightly above $126,000 in October before losing momentum. In recent sessions, the asset has traded largely sideways, hovering near the $89,500 level.

Click here to get the latest news from Coin Engineer!

The post Is Quantum Computing Behind Bitcoin Sideways Price Action? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Where Bitcoin Is Actually Vulnerable

Bitcoin’s exposure to quantum computing does not stem from mining or proof-of-work. The real concern lies in its digital signature scheme. The network relies on ECDSA and Schnorr signatures built on the secp256k1 elliptic curve. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm could, in principle, derive private keys from publicly revealed keys.

Current estimates suggest that such an attack would require roughly 2,000 to 4,000 logical qubits. Today’s hardware is far from this threshold, implying that Bitcoin likely has a preparation window of at least a decade. This buffer provides time for research, testing, and gradual upgrades—but it does not eliminate the challenge.

Post-Quantum Cryptography Comes at a Cost

The cryptography community has not been idle. The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology has already finalized several post-quantum digital signature standards, including ML-DSA (Dilithium) and SLH-DSA (SPHINCS+), with Falcon also moving toward standardization. In theory, Bitcoin could adopt these schemes through new output types or hybrid signature models.

The trade-off is efficiency. Post-quantum signatures are significantly larger and more computationally demanding. This would reduce effective block capacity, increase transaction fees, and raise the operational burden on nodes. The harder problem, however, is not engineering—it is governance. Coordinating a global consensus-driven upgrade is far more complex than deploying new code.

Saylor and Lost Coins

One of the most controversial assumptions is that “lost coins” would simply remain frozen. On-chain data tells a different story. The real risk is not whether a coin is actively used, but whether its public key is already visible on the blockchain.

Legacy P2PK outputs and modern Taproot (P2TR) outputs expose public keys by design. Estimates suggest that roughly 25% of the total Bitcoin supply—around 1.7 million BTC—falls into this category. These coins are not necessarily frozen; many are simply unattended. In a true quantum scenario, they could become prime targets.

Scarcity or Systemic Stress?

A post-quantum transition does not automatically imply reduced supply. Multiple outcomes are possible: unupgraded coins may be abandoned, exposed coins could be compromised, or markets could react defensively long before a real threat materializes.

Bitcoin may indeed emerge stronger in a quantum era, but the path there is unlikely to be smooth. The challenge is less about cryptography itself and more about coordination, incentives, and collective action. Saylor’s optimism ultimately rests not on mathematics alone, but on confidence in human decision-making under pressure.

What is MicroStrategy (Strategy)?

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Saylor: Quantum Will Strengthen Bitcoin Rather Than Weaken It! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

QRL simplifies blockchain interaction with user-friendly applications, including desktop (Windows, Mac, Linux), mobile (iOS, Android), and web wallets, shielding users from the complexities of quantum-resistant technology. This article explores QRL’s essence, functionality, advantages, risks, and tokenomics in detail.

What is Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL)?

QRL is an innovative blockchain platform engineered to protect against quantum computing threats. Traditional blockchains rely on elliptic curve cryptography (ECDSA), which is challenging for classical computers but vulnerable to quantum computers using Shor’s algorithm. QRL addresses this by implementing XMSS, a NIST-approved, hash-based scheme that ensures quantum-resistant security.

Its open-source codebase, validated by third-party audits from red4sec and x41 D-sec, guarantees reliability. QRL offers developers extensive APIs and documentation, enabling the creation of secure applications for the quantum age. With desktop, mobile, and web wallets, QRL ensures seamless user onboarding, with Quanta serving as its native currency. By securing blockchain signatures with XMSS, QRL enhances immutability and resilience against quantum attacks, allowing users to transact, mine, or run nodes in an accessible ecosystem.

Purpose of QRL

QRL’s mission is to deliver enterprise-grade security to the blockchain ecosystem, with a focus on safeguarding against quantum computing threats. Unlike traditional blockchains that depend on ECDSA, which quantum computers could compromise, QRL employs XMSS from its genesis block. This forward-secure signature scheme, with minimal assumptions, protects assets and transactions in the quantum era.

QRL provides an open-source infrastructure, reinforced by third-party audits for transparency. Its user-friendly wallets and APIs make blockchain technology accessible, while its quantum-resistant address format strengthens transaction security. QRL aims to be a reliable foundation for developers and users, ensuring blockchain’s longevity in a quantum future.

How Does QRL Work?

QRL is built on hash-based cryptography, with XMSS ensuring quantum-resistant addresses. Each address generates a Merkle tree composed of One Time Signature (OTS) key indices. By default, a tree height of 10 provides 1024 OTS indices, each usable for only one transaction, a cornerstone of QRL’s quantum security. Private keys (mnemonic phrase or hexseed) regenerate the Merkle tree, while the public address is a 79-character hexadecimal string prefixed with “Q.” Larger tree heights offer more OTS indices but increase wallet opening times.

Wallets

QRL offers diverse wallet options to meet user needs:

• Web Wallet: Accessible at it enables address creation, transactions, and network tool access. XMSS operations run via WebAssembly in the browser, with private keys erased upon closing the wallet.

• Desktop Wallet: Available for Windows, Mac, and Linux, it opens addresses using hexseed, mnemonic, or wallet.json files.

• Ledger Wallet: A hardware wallet stores private keys offline, requiring physical authorization for transactions.

• Mobile Wallet: Supports iOS and Android for transactions and balance checks but will be delisted from app stores on May 30, 2025. Users must back up wallets and transition to alternatives.

• Offline Wallet: Air-gapped address creation ensures internet-free security, with private keys stored securely.

Balance Lookup

QRL’s blockchain immutably records address balances. Methods include:

• Block Explorer: Displays balance and transaction history using the public address.

• Wallets: Show balances upon opening with private keys.

• Command Line Tools: Enable advanced queries via APIs, with public key usage recommended.

Mining

QRL uses the RandomX Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus algorithm, optimized for CPUs to resist ASIC/GPU mining. Miners use tools like XMR-Stak to earn rewards. Options include:

• Solo Mining: Runs on a full node, offering full block rewards but with lower success odds.

• Pool Mining: Combines CPU hashrate, distributing rewards based on contribution.

Nodes

QRL nodes validate transactions, mint blocks, and maintain immutable history. The P2P network ensures consensus, while APIs provide developer access. Nodes collect transactions from the mempool and integrate them into the blockchain, forming the distributed ledger’s core.

Service Status

The QRL Foundation monitors services, providing updates on the web wallet, Block Explorer, and nodes. Email notifications alert users to outages.

API

QRL’s APIs, built on gRPC, use qrl.proto to offer developers access to blockchain functions. Running a personal node is the best practice.

QRL Use Cases

QRL supports:

• Cryptocurrency Storage: Quantum-resistant wallets for secure asset holding.

• Mining: Earning Quanta via CPU mining.

• Development: Building DApps with APIs.

• Node Operation: Contributing to network security.

Usage Steps:

1. Create an address using the web wallet.

2. Securely back up private keys (mnemonic or hexseed).

3. Check balances via the Block Explorer.

4. Mine Quanta with mining software.

5. Develop applications or run a node using APIs.

Advantages of QRL

• Quantum-Resistant Security: XMSS protects against Shor’s algorithm.

• Open-Source Transparency: Audited by red4sec and x41 D-sec.

• User-Friendly: Supports web, desktop, mobile, and offline wallets.

• Developer-Centric: Robust APIs and documentation.

• Secure Signatures: OTS indices ensure single-use signatures for enhanced security.

QRL Tokenomics

QRL manages inflation and emission for long-term stability:

• Circulating Supply: 78,325,232 Quanta.

• Maximum Supply: 105,000,000 Quanta, reached via exponential decay over 200 years.

• Initial Inflation: 4.9133%; current: 1.1443%.

• Block Reward: 1.546054894 Quanta (60 seconds).

• Initial Supply: 52,000,000 public, 13,000,000 reserved (8,000,000 for QRL Foundation).

• Emission: 40,000,000 Quanta distributed over 200 years, with 1 trillion QUs per epoch.

• Mining: RandomX PoW, with PoS in development.

The tokenomics structure uses exponential decay for sustainability, with mining rewards incentivizing network participation. QRL Foundation reserves support distribution and development.

QRL Partnerships

QRL collaborates with strategic partners to advance quantum-resistant technology:

• Die QRL Stiftung: Governance and funding.

• Geometry Labs: Technical development and research.

• MerkleTree Labs: Cryptographic innovation.

• Quantum Compliance Limited: Regulatory compliance.

• Quantum Future Limited: Forward-looking solutions.

• Singularity Systems: System integration.

• Volt Development: Development support.

These partnerships bolster QRL’s ecosystem, enhancing security and scalability.

QRL Team

The QRL team comprises experts in blockchain and quantum-resistant technology:

• Peter Waterland (Founder & Developer): Shapes QRL’s vision and leads technical efforts.

• Kaushal Kumar Singh (Core Developer): Drives the platform’s technical infrastructure.

The team is committed to open-source principles, working transparently with the community.

Official Links

• Website
• X (Twitter)
• Whitepaper

Also, in the comment section, you can freely share your comments and opinions about the topic. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on Telegram, YouTube and Twitter for the latest news and updates.

The post What is Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL)? appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Quranium prepares for a future where traditional encryption methods used by Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other major blockchain networks could be broken by quantum computers. Equipped with NIST-approved post-quantum encryption algorithms like SLH-DSA and ML-KEM, Quranium excels with high transaction throughput and a scalable Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism.

QRNRush: The Ultimate Task Board for Web3 Contributors

Quranium has launched #QRNRush, a task board to unite the true Web3 community and encourage participation in its ecosystem. This program allows users to earn QPoints through social media and testnet activities, climbing the leaderboard. QRNRush is an airdrop campaign that rewards participants and fosters contributions to the platform’s growth. Here are the participation steps:

• Register: Click here to sign up.
• Install the Extension: Download and set up the QSafe Wallet (a quantum-resistant, multi-chain wallet) from the Chrome Web Store.
• Complete Tasks: Engage in social media tasks and participate in testnet activities.
• Collect QPoints: Earn QPoints by completing tasks and rise on the leaderboard.
• Claim Rewards: Gain eligibility for the $QRN token airdrop through active participation.

Tasks and Rewards

Quranium’s airdrop program is packed with tasks designed to encourage active participation in the ecosystem. Here are some tasks and the QPoints they offer:

• Daily Check-in: Connect your wallet to earn 5 QPoints every 24 hours.
• Join Telegram Announcement Channel: 10 QPoints with verification.
• Join Telegram Community Channel: 10 QPoints.
• Join Discord: 10 QPoints with a verified role.
• Claim Coins from Faucet: 5 QPoints for testnet use.
• Like, Retweet, and Comment on the Latest X Post: 10 QPoints.
• Follow Quranium on X: 10 QPoints.
• Connect Gmail Account: 5 QPoints via user profile page verification.
• Mint QRN Fragment: Earn fragments by completing weekly tasks.
• Invite Friends: 5 QPoints per referral.

These tasks enable users to explore the platform while taking an active role in the community. QPoints play a crucial role in determining airdrop rewards, with higher leaderboard rankings leading to larger $QRN token rewards.

Strong Backers and Partnerships

Quranium stands out with a robust network of supporters in the Web3 space:

• Sponsorship: Backed by Bybit.
• Investors: Funded by Animoca Brands and Cointelegraph, raising $6 million from leading venture capital firms.
• Followers: Supported by BNB Chain and major investors.
• Partnerships: Collaborations with Bitcoin.com, Bitget, and ICP.
• Support: Backed by IBM Partner Plus.

This strong backing enhances Quranium’s credibility, proving it is a global movement leading the charge in Web3 and quantum technology.

Reliability and Technological Innovation

Quranium’s quantum-resistant blockchain technology is prepared for future quantum computing threats. Taking heed of warnings that quantum computers could break encryption algorithms like ECDSA and BLS used by traditional blockchains, Quranium employs advanced quantum-secure algorithms such as SLH-DSA and WOTS+. Additionally, its Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatibility allows developers to seamlessly port existing smart contracts to the platform.

Quranium’s four core products reflect its innovative spirit:

• QSafe Wallet: A quantum-resistant, multi-chain wallet supporting Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and more.
• QRN Token: The native token used for staking, governance, and transaction fees.
• QRN Faucet: A platform providing test tokens for testnet use.
• QRemix AI: An AI-powered IDE for developing smart contracts and dApps using natural language.

These features make Quranium an attractive ecosystem for both developers and users.

Esteemed Advisory Board

Quranium is supported by a team of distinguished advisors:

• Michael Terpin: Known as the “godfather of crypto,” CEO of Transform Ventures. Founder of Transform Group, which launched over 300 blockchain projects, including Ethereum. Founder of BitAngels and CoinAgenda.
• James Bernard: COO of Radiant Souls and former DMCC Director. A founding member of the Dubai Global Blockchain Council and a pioneer in digital asset regulations.
• Sebastien Borget: Co-founder and COO of The Sandbox. Created a decentralized metaverse where over 40 million players create content with NFTs and SAND tokens. President of the Blockchain Game Alliance.
• John Keith King: Former White House Communications Engineer. Served as the lead engineer for the communication line between the U.S. President and the Kremlin, with cybersecurity expertise in USSPACECOM and USAFRICOM.
• Muhammad Al Saiyari: President of the Saudi Quantum Computing Association. Leads the quantum computing program at Saudi Aramco, with over 20 years of experience in ERP and digital transformation.

These advisors strengthen Quranium’s vision, positioning it as a global leader.

Why Participate in the Quranium Airdrop?

Quranium’s airdrop program offers more than just rewards; it provides an opportunity to be part of an ecosystem at the intersection of quantum, blockchain, and artificial intelligence. QRNRush enables users to test the platform, provide feedback, and earn $QRN tokens as rewards. Early participants can maximize rewards by engaging in testnet activities and completing tasks.

Quranium is redefining the future of Web3. With its quantum-secure infrastructure, AI integration, and Ethereum compatibility, it is not just a blockchain project but a foundational layer for the digital world. Join #QRNRush, set up your QSafe Wallet, and become part of this revolution!

This content does not constitute investment advice.

You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.

The post Quranium Airdrop: Seize Rewards in the Quantum and Blockchain Revolution! appeared first on Coin Engineer.

Microsoft and California-based technology firm Atom Computing recently announced a breakthrough in quantum computing that could pave the way for a transformation in the proof-of-work (PoW) system used in blockchain mining.

Scientists and engineers from the two companies developed a quantum computing system made up of 24 entangled logical qubits, produced using only 80 physical qubits setting a new record for the highest number of entangled logical qubits achieved with error correction techniques.

The significance of this scientific breakthrough lies in the efficiency the teams achieved. Previous estimates had suggested that thousands of physical qubits working together might be needed to produce a single logical qubit.

Thanks to the entanglement of 24 logical qubits created with just 80 physical qubits, the reference frame for how large these systems can be scaled and when companies like Microsoft and Atom Computing might scale them has shifted significantly.

Atom Computing Overview

Analysts have long predicted that quantum computers could reach a capacity to provide an advantage or quantum speedup in breaking certain classical data security measures.

What are Quantum Computers and SHA-256 Encryption?

In certain blockchain networks, such as the Bitcoin blockchain, miners must solve a puzzle to demonstrate proof-of-work (PoW).

The most advanced blockchain miners, such as the models used by the world’s largest Bitcoin mining facilities, compete to find a hash for a block header. To solve the puzzle, they need to find a hash that matches a target defined by the network’s difficulty.

What makes this process even more complex is that the difficulty is adjusted every 2,016 blocks to ensure new blocks are added to the blockchain approximately every 10 minutes. As a result, it has become increasingly difficult for classical miners to solve the puzzle.

What is Grover’s Algorithm?

The theoretical data-mining technique known as “Grover’s Algorithm” could mark the end of classical blockchain mining.

Grover’s Algorithm is a method that offers a square-root speedup over classical brute-force searches and has been proven in small-scale experiments. However, its application to large-scale problems, such as SHA-256, remains theoretical because the quantum hardware needed for such a task has not yet been developed.

Specifically, for SHA-256, a quantum computer with hundreds or thousands of error-corrected logical qubits would be required for Grover’s Algorithm to function well enough to break classical encryption algorithms.

Quantum Speed Up

Grover’s algorithm could reduce the complexity of SHA-256 to half of what is required by classical methods, and properties of quantum mechanics such as superposition and interference further enhance the potential for speedup.

With approximately 3,000 logical qubits, systems like those from Microsoft and Atom Computing could surpass classical mining pools and have the capability to win blocks. However, it remains uncertain when such quantum mining systems will become available; estimates range from 10 to 50 years.

Microsoft and Atom Computing‘s plan to launch a 1,000-qubit quantum computer in 2025 could be an important step forward in this field.

In the comment section, you can freely share your comments about the topic. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter for the latest news and updates.

The post Quantum Signal from Microsoft for Blockchain Mining appeared first on Coin Engineer.