Yeliz Akmaca 
The newly launched token by Trove Markets suffered a sharp collapse shortly after trading began. The early price structure unraveled fast, wiping out nearly 95% of value for investors who bought in during the first hours. The damage was not limited to price action alone — confidence around the project took a direct hit.
Initial pricing pointed to a market capitalization near $20 million. That structure did not hold. As the token slid to around $0.0008, its market value fell below the $1–2 million range. On-chain data shows that several wallets began selling heavily almost immediately after the token generation event. This selling wave fueled rapid “rug pull” accusations across social platforms.
Selling Pressure Intensified After Launch
Shortly before the launch, the Trove Markets team introduced a major shift in the project’s technical roadmap. The platform, originally planned to be built on Hyperliquid, was redirected to Solana. The late-stage change created uncertainty among early supporters.
According to team statements, the move followed a liquidity partner’s decision to unwind a 500,000 HYPE token position. However, the decision to retain most of the $11.5 million raised — rather than issuing broader refunds — quickly became a focal point of criticism.
Once trading opened, liquidity drained almost entirely from one side of the order book. Large sell orders executed within a short window left little room for stabilization. Early investors absorbed the bulk of the losses, amplifying frustration across the community.
Millions Raised Before the Collapse
Public disclosures indicate that Trove raised approximately $11.5 million during its token sale. The team stated that $9.4 million would be retained for development and the blockchain transition. About $2.44 million was refunded to certain investors, with an additional $100,000 set aside for further reimbursements.
As the price collapsed, the retained funds drew sharper scrutiny. Investors began questioning why such a large share remained under team control and how allocation decisions were structured.
Token Distribution Raises Red Flags
On-chain analysis revealed that a meaningful portion of the token supply concentrated in a small number of newly created wallets. Some transfers were routed through services such as ChangeHero, adding to transparency concerns.
Following these findings, calls for public audits and legal action began circulating. Community moderators and several crypto commentators demanded clearer timelines and more detailed explanations from the team.
Solana Pivot Failed to Restore Confidence
Trove acknowledged that the withdrawal of a key partner disrupted its original Hyperliquid-based strategy, forcing the Solana pivot. The team emphasized that development would continue and that the project had not been abandoned.
So far, those assurances have done little to offset the trust erosion triggered by the launch-day collapse.
Delivery Now Determines the Outcome
From here, execution matters more than messaging. If Trove can deliver a functioning platform with real trading depth, some of the backlash may ease over time.
If not, the episode is likely to stand as another reminder of how quickly markets punish late-stage changes and fragile distribution structures. When most of the funds remain in team custody, price damage alone rarely closes the story.
You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.