Haciyev Reşit 
Political tensions between Democrats and Republicans in the United States are no longer limited to election periods. Recent developments show that this rivalry is now extending into cryptocurrency and technology policy as well. Calls have been made for an investigation into White House Crypto and AI Czar David Sacks and U.S. Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff over chip agreements conducted with the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Chip Deals Under Scrutiny
According to a report by Semafor, an independent inspector affiliated with the U.S. State Department has launched a preliminary review at the request of two Democratic senators regarding certain chip-related agreements overseen by David Sacks and Steve Witkoff in the UAE. The review is examining whether ethical standards were violated during the approval process that allowed the export of advanced U.S.-made technology chips to the UAE, as well as the criteria used in making these decisions.
Senators Elizabeth Warren and Elissa Slotkin emphasized that the agreements should be assessed not only from a commercial perspective but also in terms of national security and strategic interests. The senators called for a transparent and accountable review process, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest in the decision-making process.
“Crypto Ties May Have Influenced Decisions”
One of the most notable allegations raised by the two Democratic senators is that David Sacks and Steve Witkoff have crypto-related ties to the UAE. According to the senators, these relationships may have directly or indirectly influenced decisions regarding the export of advanced U.S. technology chips. This claim has intensified calls for a broader review that includes ethical and strategic considerations, not just economic ones.
As the cryptocurrency ecosystem increasingly becomes a strategic global domain, it has introduced new areas of debate in international relations. The intersection of digital assets, financial systems, and advanced technology has heightened demands for transparency and accountability in policymaking. As a result, decisions involving technology exports, chip manufacturing, and crypto-related interests are coming under closer political scrutiny in the U.S.
No Formal Investigation Yet
The Inspector General’s Office stated that no formal investigation has been launched at this stage, clarifying that the process remains a preliminary assessment. The purpose of this initial review is to determine whether the allegations are supported by concrete evidence. If sufficient findings suggesting ethical violations or conflicts of interest emerge, the case could be escalated into a full investigation.
These developments highlight how cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence, and advanced technology policies in the U.S. are now being evaluated not only through an economic lens, but also from political and ethical perspectives. The scrutiny of senior officials’ crypto-related connections suggests that similar investigations could become more frequent in the future. Experts note that such reviews may also signal how the U.S. intends to balance global technology leadership with its evolving regulatory approach toward crypto and digital assets.
Assessment
The calls for scrutiny into David Sacks and Steve Witkoff underscore a sensitive intersection of crypto affiliations, advanced chip exports, and public-sector ethics in the United States. The renewed focus on national security, conflicts of interest, and transparency further amplifies the political significance of the issue, indicating that crypto-linked policymaking will remain a contentious topic going forward.
You can also freely share your thoughts and comments about the topic in the comment section. Additionally, don’t forget to follow us on our Telegram, YouTube, and Twitter channels for the latest news and updates.