Yahya 
In a recent social media post, Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO), David Schwartz, ignited the old argument about Bitcoin’s pseudonym creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, providing massive content to the problem. The flames of the debate have been described as having been lit by a figure from the Bitcoin community who was identified as “Ryuushi” and claimed that Craig Wright remained the principal candidate for the identity of Nakamoto, notwithstanding recent legal obstacles.
Schwartz reacted immediately, denouncing Ryuushi’s allegation based on the fact that Wright has not adduced background data to support his contention during the trial. “Satoshi is more likely to be me than Craig,” asserts Schwartz in his response, contesting the profoundly contested claims of Wright, who has always posed as the man behind Bitcoin. However, his comments not only ended his colleague’s credibility but also rekindled the suspicion that he owed his partnership to a mysterious person.
Based on the assertion of the Ripple CTO, that’s not that wrong, though. Since he has been immersed in cryptography since a young age, experts in the field have suggested that he is the most likely candidate to be Nakamoto. This fact can’t be considered new. Once data has been conjectured, established concepts are sometimes assigned to individuals in a field as close to cryptography as possible, which only adds to the mystery surrounding bitcoin creators.
Latest this revelation is giving more intensity to an already complicated and arguable story within the community. As debate roars on in the cryptocurrency space and beyond, the identity of mysterious creator of Bitcoin is no nearer getting recognized and the hunt remains as interesting and mysterious as ever.